JimmyG89
Registered User
- May 1, 2010
- 10,143
- 9,025
Brendan Smith is already on the team and is barely a defenseman anymore.
Yes, but he's the 7th D. We don't need another.
Brendan Smith is already on the team and is barely a defenseman anymore.
If whoever is going to be the 7th D they’ll have plenty of time to learn the system in practiceI wonder if they’ll bring in a 7D type.
perhaps a UFA who already knows Quinn’s system.
I was cringing, not lighting myself on fire.Now. Now. Don't fret. It will be Vinni Lettieri.
If whoever is going to be the 7th D they’ll have plenty of time to learn the system in practice
Yes, but he's the 7th D. We don't need another.
I wonder how ADA feels about this happening.......conveniently, NOW? Had this happened prior to the season......he would have been like "hey, we have cap flexibility", so give it to me!Flexibility is always a good thing, you never know what kind of situation could open up as the year goes on
I think this is to see if one of the kids can step up a 2C. Might as well figure out that sooner than later, and if not we already have some space for the TDL
That’s really the only issue I see... that we gave he and Spooner new contracts that looked bad less than a year in. Yes they were for 2 years but we all said it was too much $ and it didn’t take long to be proven correct and, in this instance, for it to become an issue with the cap.Names is an okay player. He was okay offensively. He was okay defensively with an okay forechecking game and an okay physical game. He was an okay penalty killer but not someone you really wanted to see out on the power play. He skated well but more or less the average for an NHL player. Nothing particularly about him ever stood out but he was never terrible. He should have been making $2--2.5 mil a year.
getting 89 cents on the dollar instead of 91 cents on the dollar. people love nitpickingI'm still not understanding why people are upset about this...?
I feel like I’m not totally putting this puzzle that you’ve laid out togetherYes but there’s one out there who already knows it.
I don’t think they’re looking to solve the 2C situation by the trade deadline unless a no brainer falls into their lapsI think this is to see if one of the kids can step up a 2C. Might as well figure out that sooner than later, and if not we already have some space for the TDL
That’s really the only issue I see... that we gave he and Spooner new contracts that looked bad less than a year in. Yes they were for 2 years but we all said it was too much $ and it didn’t take long to be proven correct and, in this instance, for it to become an issue with the cap.
Its another loss for Gorton... he’s still WAYYYYYY ahead mind u but those two contracts do give me pause.
Maybe that is actually the point? Maybe deep down theyre thinking.....oh shit, we are 2-0. We dont necessarily wanna be a possible PO/bubble team. Lmao.How much cap space does this give them and what can they realistically use it for? I give Namestnikov **** but the roster is now worse than it was an hour ago.
Hey everyone, Sens fan here.
How good of a skater and how fast is Namestikov? We need a lot more speed in our line-up.
Completely understand... but Spooner is done... turned him into Strome... ok fine. It’s just that we NEVER seem to have a clue when giving out contracts. Names and Smith also. I won’t lump Staal in because of diff circumstances and Sather was in then... but we just can’t seem to get it right. Skjei may prove that again (I REALLY hope not).You’re not going to find a GM who doesn’t have moments like those in his tenure.
I say, it served a purpose. Who were we supposed to ice "instead" of them? The team was up theperverbial creek with no paddle. You cannot ice an AHL team for those prices. Thats like telling your fans F....U......they have to give them "something" somewhat reputable to look at.....in the meantime.Those Spooner and Vlad extensions were horrendous.
Is it worth my time figuring out who Nick Ebert is?
Edit: that sounded more obnoxious than I intended