defensorfidei
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2014
- 138
- 0
I guess the only thing that really confuses me is why NY didnt do this earlier when that cap savings couldve maybe retained Yandle.
My initial reaction: Why? There was no need to make this deal.
Following that, I decided to analyse this deal alot more thoroughly. This makes sense for the Sens since we have Turris who will be needing a new contract in two years. Having Brassard gives us two solid centers as a 1B/1B duo and he has three years left which he will be getting paid 3M, 3.5M & 3.5M which is a steal for his play.
Zibanejad will be an RFA next season, the Sens probably wanted to see how much he wanted and the difference between his demands and their offer was probably huge. I think this makes sense because his last contract the bridge to see what type of player he will be. Personally, I think he has grown in the past two years but I'm still uncomfortable signing him to a bigger contract as he was one of the biggest question marks on the team. He is probably looking to cash out as a 2C or 1B which is unrealistic IMO (4.5M-5.5M).
The majority of people seem to think it favors the Rangers but I see it as a win/win because both teams had their reasons behind making this move. The 2nd round pick that was added is frustrating for Sens fans but they did eat the 2M bonus and it seems like Melnyk may value that more than the pick. Rangers pipeline is bare with all the picks they have moved in recent years but saving those 5 years between Zibby & Brassard is the most important thing for them. Adding a 2nd for 2M makes sense as they have a huge amount of money.
Win/Win for both teams.
I guess the only thing that really confuses me is why NY didnt do this earlier when that cap savings couldve maybe retained Yandle.
My initial reaction: Why? There was no need to make this deal.
Following that, I decided to analyse this deal alot more thoroughly. This makes sense for the Sens since we have Turris who will be needing a new contract in two years. Having Brassard gives us two solid centers as a 1B/1B duo and he has three years left which he will be getting paid 3M, 3.5M & 3.5M which is a steal for his play.
Zibanejad will be an RFA next season, the Sens probably wanted to see how much he wanted and the difference between his demands and their offer was probably huge. I think this makes sense because his last contract the bridge to see what type of player he will be. Personally, I think he has grown in the past two years but I'm still uncomfortable signing him to a bigger contract as he was one of the biggest question marks on the team. He is probably looking to cash out as a 2C or 1B which is unrealistic IMO (4.5M-5.5M).
The majority of people seem to think it favors the Rangers but I see it as a win/win because both teams had their reasons behind making this move. The 2nd round pick that was added is frustrating for Sens fans but they did eat the 2M bonus and it seems like Melnyk may value that more than the pick. Rangers pipeline is bare with all the picks they have moved in recent years but saving those 5 years between Zibby & Brassard is the most important thing for them. Adding a 2nd for 2M makes sense as they have a huge amount of money.
Win/Win for both teams.
Except the part where Brassard is really good.
Brassard has never put up first line numbers but he's a first line centre how? he's not exactly Selke calibur either.
I guess the only thing that really confuses me is why NY didnt do this earlier when that cap savings couldve maybe retained Yandle.
I guess the only thing that really confuses me is why NY didnt do this earlier when that cap savings couldve maybe retained Yandle.
Mika has spurts of unstoppable plays, and then pure invisible. I'm hoping Brassard is going to be slightly more noticeable for Ottawa than Mika was. But it is a pretty lateral move IMO, not a fan of the draft pick swap though.
60 points is first line numbers. this isn't 2006
60 points and 58 points in the last two years
Those are low end 1C numbers
What would 1st line numbers be? A specific amount of points? Or simply top 30 amongst Centers? Top 90 amongst Forwards?
Except last year where he was in the top 30 points for centers?
Sens must have seen something they don't like in Zibanejad. Something not obvious to fans. I imagine the timing of this trade is due to initial contract extension talk with him. Maybe the two sides are so far apart that Ottawa felt they might as well cut ties now and maximize value?
I like this for the Rangers. Another cap strapped team helped off the ledge.
He has always been used as a Center.
That guy also posted on your board that he is a "3C, fill in 2C"
So I don't think he entirely knows what he is talking about.
Sens must have seen something they don't like in Zibanejad. Something not obvious to fans. I imagine the timing of this trade is due to initial contract extension talk with him. Maybe the two sides are so far apart that Ottawa felt they might as well cut ties now and maximize value?
if you look at 5on5 play he's not a top line center in any area.
http://public.tableau.com/shared/PMJ8WKFZH?:display_count=yes&:showVizHome=no