True Blue
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 30,092
- 8,362
It's the reincarnated Webster. Never mind Norway vs. BulgariaAll I know is that it isn't Wolfy.
It's the reincarnated Webster. Never mind Norway vs. BulgariaAll I know is that it isn't Wolfy.
He was such a swell guy for us that we decided to reward him with the legal entitlementAnd that's fine, but it's not because he was such a swell guy for us, but because legally he's entitled to this.
@Amazing Kreiderman does Kravtsov have any experience playing the the left side?
Give away Georgiev and you are giving away the next Hasek. The only difference is Georgiev is 23, Hasek was almost 26 when the Blackhawks traded him to Buffalo for the legendary Stephane Beauregard.
Agreed, except not only younger but better HasekGive away Georgiev and you are giving away the next Hasek. The only difference is Georgiev is 23, Hasek was almost 26 when the Blackhawks traded him to Buffalo for the legendary Stephane Beauregard.
By season's end wasn't Georgiev playing over 50% of the games? Why would it revert in any way next season?You could start Hank 45 games next year, where he's still the nominal starter. Give Georgiev 25 starts and the rest to Shesterkin, or some other breakdown depending on how those two play. You do it next year.
Then, heading into the final year of his deal, you have a frank conversation with him that he's now the backup to whoever, and that the organizational preference would be to try to send him somewhere else that he's open to. He'll be due "only" $5.5M and $1M of that is a signing bonus. Maybe he's open to being moved in his final year, or maybe he's ready to retire.
You could start Hank 45 games next year, where he's still the nominal starter. Give Georgiev 25 starts and the rest to Shesterkin, or some other breakdown depending on how those two play. You do it next year.
Then, heading into the final year of his deal, you have a frank conversation with him that he's now the backup to whoever, and that the organizational preference would be to try to send him somewhere else that he's open to. He'll be due "only" $5.5M and $1M of that is a signing bonus. Maybe he's open to being moved in his final year, or maybe he's ready to retire.
I mean, didn't Georgiev do the same two years ago? Playing out the string in a rebuilding season? There's a difference between closing out a failed campaign by giving the young guy more starts and starting off a fresh season doing the same. It's definitely possible--I'm not saying it's a guarantee that Hank is penciled in as the starter next year. It's just kind of my assumption, given the respect the organization seems to show Lundqvist. We'll see, I guess.By season's end wasn't Georgiev playing over 50% of the games? Why would it revert in any way next season?
I haven't seen Park Ridge I, so please, no spoilers.Make your dumb personal comments all you want, you sound like the Blackhawks before they traded Hasek. My opinion comes from my father a goalie who worked with Craig Anderson in Park Ridge Il. my dad knows a thing or two about the goalie position and talent potential. With that you tire me. No more need to converse, I will just come back and laugh at all you clowns if a trade is made.
I mean, you name yourself in reference to one of the looniest posters we've ever had, and then compare our backup to arguably the most talented goaltender to play the game. And you expect to be taken seriously with that?Make your dumb personal comments all you want, you sound like the Blackhawks before they traded Hasek. My opinion comes from my father a goalie who worked with Craig Anderson in Park Ridge Il. my dad knows a thing or two about the goalie position and talent potential. With that you tire me. No more need to converse, I will just come back and laugh at all you clowns if a trade is made.
Gut says none of the aboveMaybe he's open to being moved in his final year, or maybe he's ready to retire.
Make your dumb personal comments all you want, you sound like the Blackhawks before they traded Hasek. My opinion comes from my father a goalie who worked with Craig Anderson when he was a youth in Park Ridge Il. my dad knows a thing or two about the goalie position and talent potential. With that you tire me. No more need to converse, I will just come back and laugh at all you clowns if a trade is made.
But has he quoted Henry James? If he has, now you are talking about expertise.My dad taught high school English, but I'm pretty sure I've never quoted Shakespeare on here.
Georgiev was also horrendous in the NHL at the start of this year. And Igor hasn’t played a single game.
Let them all compete and the best players sort out. I don’t think it’s set that hank is anything but number 1 of this group now, let alone being number 3.
But has he quoted Henry James? If he has, now you are talking about expertise.
Unless said parent can actually quote Henry JamesHe probably did many times. Unfortunately, I cannot.
Appealing to a parent's opinion is a form of argument I have not seen in a long time. Like... junior high?
Just answer the question like a person instead of promoting your twitter page.![]()
Give away Georgiev and you are giving away the next Hasek. The only difference is Georgiev is 23, Hasek was almost 26 when the Blackhawks traded him to Buffalo for the legendary Stephane Beauregard.