McClelland
Registered User
Please explain how adding Tavares + the return for Nylander is worse than only having Nylander.
I'll wait.
I talking mainly about Tavares mega contract , could easily end up to have negative value in 4-5 years, Nylander 2 first seasons in Nhl is close to identical to Tavares 2 first seasons. Tavares contract handcuffs Tml, had been hard enough to keep the young core together without the Tavares signing.
Nylanders tradevalue arent at the top when team know Tml situation, doesnt get you full value and needs when the season already started.
That Nylander hasnt signed yet hasnt to do so much about money as future in the team, Tavares made his future C assignment go up in smoke.
Nylander wants some insurance that he isnt a future tradechip, to show that you want him and believe in him you do like Oilers did with Draisaitl, Make him a less tradebait , its aa kind of a nmc for a rfa.
The problem is tht Tml wants him to take a discount which make him great trade asset, and he can end up in the dark longterm,