crowfish
Registered User
- Jun 3, 2011
- 1,121
- 1,504
He didn't have a slump. He just completely missed the 20-21 regular season, and missed about 40 games in the 21-22 season due to injuries. In the 22-23 season, he returned to the elite again in 3rd place with 113 points. Since 2017, he has not had a single disastrous season or a serious part of the season. He is as consistent as McDavid, only with slightly lower numbers.He's gonna be hard for anyone to catch if he keeps this up. I thought he'd hit some sort of slump that just about everyone hits.
Kuch missed the game as well as McDavid. Adjust to 81 GP.If you take their current PPG, account for missed games, you get
Kucherov: 82 GP 57 G 84 A 141 P
MacKinnon: 82 GP 45 G 85 A 130 P
McDavid: 80 GP 34 G 89 A 125 P
I don't think anyone besides these three has a decent shot.
It's over lol.And McDavid.
Don’t let the fact that it’s going to take four months for the Oilers to play their four games in hand on the others trick you into thinking that this a true 10-14 point gap.
Of course, it is predictable fodder for the future when we will have to listen how it took McDavid all season to gain the lead, while ignoring his injury where he missed 2 games and was rushed back early to then play like a shell of himself for 9 games, while also having a handful less games available to him than anyone else.
Hats off to Kucherov and MacKinnon for making McDavid pay early though.
I do love the narrative that it’s still “inevitable” for McDavid to win the Art Ross.Gotta hand it to both Kucherov and MacKinnon. Another 2 points and 3 points respectively, as McDavid went off for 5 to keep the lead from getting slashed nearly in half in just one game.
It’s only a matter of time, but they’re certainly doing their best to fend off the inevitable collapse.
I do love the narrative that it’s still “inevitable” for McDavid to win the Art Ross.
Not like any of the top point-getters are guys playing way above expectations save for maybe JT Miller.
McDavid’s early-season faltering allowed for other guys to take the throne. Up to him to win it back. Nights like tonight shows he can, but not that he “inevitably” will.
As good as Kucherov is, I cant see him maintaining the roughly 2 ppg he's had for about the last 20 games or so. But I think somewhere in the 130 range is a decent bet.
Kucherov is so underrated lol.
Isn't the Hart usually more likely to go to the guy on the worse team all else being equal?Only a matter of time before McDavid overtakes MacKinnon and Kucherov for the Art Ross.
Question is, does that allow him to pass them for the Hart? If Tampa misses the playoffs, Kucherov won't get a sniff. But MacKinnon finishing, say, only 5-7 points behind McDavid but his team having a much better record could sway voters his way.
Only a matter of time before McDavid overtakes MacKinnon and Kucherov for the Art Ross.
Question is, does that allow him to pass them for the Hart? If Tampa misses the playoffs, Kucherov won't get a sniff. But MacKinnon finishing, say, only 5-7 points behind McDavid but his team having a much better record could sway voters his way.
All else being equal, the guy on the worse team usually gets more credit for the Hart. So McDavid should get even more credit for carrying a weak team to the playoffs.If Colorado takes the top seed in the West and the points difference is close, I think he'd get the votes to go his way. So much hockey left to go though, I'd just like to see Mackinnon stay healthy for an entire season for once. So many what ifs in season's past, I just want to see that sentence completed for once.
All else being equal, the guy on the worse team usually gets more credit for the Hart. So McDavid should get even more credit for carrying a weak team to the playoffs.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the NHL writers to go out of their way to do the dumbest thing possible though. They generally do.
Problem is, MacKinnon's team from top to bottom this season is arguably weaker than McDavid's.All else being equal, the guy on the worse team usually gets more credit for the Hart. So McDavid should get even more credit for carrying a weak team to the playoffs.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the NHL writers to go out of their way to do the dumbest thing possible though. They generally do.
So, if you believe that NHL writers generally "go out of their way to do the dumbest thing possible," why would you out any value in a trophy decided by them?All else being equal, the guy on the worse team usually gets more credit for the Hart. So McDavid should get even more credit for carrying a weak team to the playoffs.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the NHL writers to go out of their way to do the dumbest thing possible though. They generally do.