JT AM da real deal
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2018
- 12,421
- 7,842
Mens against boys .. men always winWhatever do you mean?
![]()
![]()
Mens against boys .. men always winWhatever do you mean?
![]()
![]()
I think he looks good personally. I think that line has been hemmed in a bit more than they should, but in all honesty I think he is only a small part of that. JT is still making some questionable decisions with the puck on his stick in his own half of the ice.I didn't get to see the game last night. How did he look?
How many years ago was that?
I think you'll find very few players built like Hull anymore.
Lol, sorry no I'm familiar with the Hull picture. I was referring to the scrawny Marner picture, he has filled out quite a bit since then.It was back when a lot of players were farmers and such. You'll see similar pictures of Gordie Howe and others.
Funny thing is people will talk about older players as out of shape smokers and such. They could also lift a Buick. Obviously they didn't have the same type of training you get today but they were beasts. Tim Horton, for instance, probably had a wider neck than McDavid does a chest. Rather than fight he would literally bear hug people into submission.
Lol, sorry no I'm familiar with the Hull picture. I was referring to the scrawny Marner picture, he has filled out quite a bit since then.
Great scorer, but Hull disappeared in too many playoff elimination games and had little interest playing defence.Mens against boys .. men always win
For me, I think he has the drive and the potential to gain more NHL skills and become a much better player, but he has to remain healthy. I sometimes get Soshnikov vibes from him and the way he plays.Not an NHL player at this Time and perhaps not ever. He has a great Shot and good speed but lacks all the other nhl skills. Hope we trade him before he confirms he is not a NHL player.
Unfortunately Bill, "Babcock" and "professionalism" is an oxymoron because Babcock quite frankly was a moron when it came to dealing with players.Robertson needs to be traded before Keefe destroys him. A top 6 type player getting 9 min per is wrong.
Lilly, Sandin, are failing and Keefe has failed to develop any others. AM, Marner Nylander got Babcock help in professionalism.
Sometimes I think he tries too hard. For example, he's got a great shot, but too often he fires it into the glass (did it three times last game). Once he settles down, those shots should be on net and we'll have quite a player on our hands. No way we should be giving up on this guy.I really like Nick's shot, and his offensive play. But in the defensive zone I feel like he chases too much and gets out of position, leading to holes.
Obviously still a young player and like other people have critiqued, I think sometimes he needs to slow down and let the game come to him. Read the play instead of always chasing.
He's got a great motor and I think can be a really solid addition if put in a position to succeed. Which must include PP time.
Really? I think he does more to help this team than either Simmonds or Spezza. He looked very good for the first half of the game against the Coyotes and has missed out on a few points by hitting posts and having both Willy and JT flub tap-ins he gave them a few games ago. He's certainly not a world beater yet but he's extremely young and has too much talent to give up on.Not an NHL player at this Time and perhaps not ever. He has a great Shot and good speed but lacks all the other nhl skills. Hope we trade him before he confirms he is not a NHL player.
And which players eventually succeeded? Getting young stars to learn is hard. Keefe has not been successful.Unfortunately Bill, "Babcock" and "professionalism" is an oxymoron because Babcock quite frankly was a moron when it came to dealing with players.
Are you really trying to give credit to Babcock for mitch marner auston matthews and William nylander?And which players eventually succeeded? Getting young stars to learn is hard. Keefe has not been successful.
It’s a worldwide game now, instead of having Billybob from stayner or Henri from rouyn filling out the bottom lines the league has the worlds best coming in to play as well.Take the 32 teams today and condensed that down to just 6 teams of the best players in the NHL today and you would create super teams just for context of what it was like back then.
Every team might have a dozen Hockey Hall of famers on them.
Toronto's 1967 team that beat Montreal would be the equivalent of Canada playing USA in the Olympics where each country sent their best.
The more teams the more watered down the League becomes.
Machiavelli once said “the end doesn’t justify the means” (or was it Tedder Keon who said that lol). But seriously, his methods really were unethical.And which players eventually succeeded? Getting young stars to learn is hard. Keefe has not been successful.ends don’t justify the means”
Imho he did a good job of this when he was with the marlies for sure. Maybe not as good in the nhl I suppose but his job is to win and Moore’s job is to develop. I understand that Keefe has to get the most out of his players and putting them in a position to succeed is part of that of course.And which players eventually succeeded? Getting young stars to learn is hard. Keefe has not been successful.
Some, what has Keefe doneAre you really trying to give credit to Babcock for mitch marner auston matthews and William nylander?
54 yrs....I don't care. Punch was unethical to some, ask Keon, ask Walton, ask Big M,Machiavelli once said “the end doesn’t justify the means” (or was it Tedder Keon who said that lol). But seriously, his methods really were unethical.
What shot? That shot that always goes sailing above the net? Yeah that shot will look great once it gets on netI really like Nick's shot,
Lol one game is always nowWhat shot? That shot that always goes sailing above the net? Yeah that shot will look great once it gets on net