twabby
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2010
- 14,166
- 15,704
Should surprise nobody. His shot is like made for PP, too bad he wasn't in the position to utilize it here.Please do not look at the SEA @ ARI box score!
Yeah, not like the powerplay was awful for three straight months . Absolutely no room to try out some of the team's best snipers on that unit!Should surprise nobody. His shot is like made for PP, too bad he wasn't in the position to utilize it here.
Vrana also scored twice last night while we're at it.
That’s right…..I fully expect Sprong to succeed in Seattle where expectations are low and ice time is high….The whole point of a trade is to create a win-win. Both players/teams get benefit.
If you screw the other team every time then nobody will trade with you.
That’s right…..I fully expect Sprong to succeed in Seattle where expectations are low and ice time is high….
This looks pretty bad from all parties, including the NHL for initially signing off on the trade. How do they not verify the status of Dadonov’s NTC before signing off on the trade?
And Vegas had to know too, right? They seem like a bunch of dirtbags at this point.
The story I've seen tweeted is that Vegas claims that they were never told of Dadonov's NTC when they traded for him in the first place. But that seems fishy given that he submitted one to them in July.And Vegas had to know too, right? They seem like a bunch of dirtbags at this point.
I think there's some subliminal notion among fans that a traded player doing well elsewhere means your own team f***ed up. This is especially true of fans who liked that player and never thought he got a fair shake.
I don't think that's the case. If a player doesn't do well with one team but flourishes elsewhere it could be due to any number of factors, and doesn't mean that player would've eventually come to life with your own team.
If a player keeps getting traded and never catches on anywhere you can be more certain the player is the problem.
/obv
Don't you have to look at this through the prism of team success?
I agree that player's success post trade is no indication that he would have eventually succeeded on your team. However, if the team that traded a player fails to achieve some measure of success, doesn't that show that the problem lies with the team and not the player? Maybe the team should adapt it's way to accommodate the player instead of jettisoning players who do not fit a failing system.
I do not want to dwell on Sprong too much as I consider him to be a very flawed player but going further back, I cannot comprehend how a player like Burakovsky can have a place on probably the fastest, most talent laden roster in the league but Caps old ass, slow as molasses team had no room for him.
As far as I can tell it just seems to be because Dorion is easier to make fun of, because I can’t figure out a reality where Vegas wouldn’t even casually inquire about it just to make sure things are on the level.The story I've seen tweeted is that Vegas claims that they were never told of Dadonov's NTC when they traded for him in the first place. But that seems fishy given that he submitted one to them in July.
e; Haven't read it in great detail, but main boards seems to be pointing the blame at Ottawa for this one
Burakovsky was the little brother of like 20 other men here and wouldn’t have grown a lick anyway.Do you think they'd have traded Burakovsky if he'd produced at the level he's established in CO?
lol yep they are screwed. You have to love it.Any cap issues from this?
Obviously, no. That's the point, though.Do you think they'd have traded Burakovsky if he'd produced at the level he's established in CO?
Obviously, no. That's the point, though.
Caps couldn't fit this player on their roster or effectively integrate him in their system. At the same time, this roster/system hasn't enjoyed much success since and has been on a clear down trend. No room for Burakovsky on the Caps but there is on Avalanche. How does that make any sense?
As it relates to Sprong, I think this team desperately needs the offensive element that this player brings but has spent a couple of seasons focusing on everything that the player does wrong.
I said it before. It would in no way surprise me if Sprong is next year's version of Anthony Duclair. A cheap and effective cog in a successful and potent offense.
I hear you. I just disagree.I just don't understand the point about Bura. He had like 4 years here including plenty of time moving up and down the top 9. He had mental issues he tried to address. Every time he moved up a line he stopped producing. When he got a shock to his system and moved down he produced more.
It's not like he was a consistent healthy scratch. He was in their plans and was scratched a few times in the Cup run to get him re-focused, iirc.
If he'd had his awakening while still in DC he'd never have been traded. I don't think it was a system thing so much as not delivering the goods based on expectations.
Obviously, no. That's the point, though.
Caps couldn't fit this player on their roster or effectively integrate him in their system. At the same time, this roster/system hasn't enjoyed much success since and has been on a clear down trend. No room for Burakovsky on the Caps but there is on Avalanche. How does that make any sense?
As it relates to Sprong, I think this team desperately needs the offensive element that this player brings but has spent a couple of seasons focusing on everything that the player does wrong.
I said it before. It would in no way surprise me if Sprong is next year's version of Anthony Duclair. A cheap and effective cog in a successful and potent offense.