No Fun Shogun
34-38-61-10-13-15
I feel like those are just way too red. As in it needs more than a bit more white or tan or the like to even things out.
Answer to question is yes it would or at least it should because of this hysteria.Actively not wearing something that's part of a team branding and messaging move is sending a definitive message of opposition.
If someone refused to wear a Latino heritage practice jersey or an Autism awareness practice jersey or a veterans' support practice jersey, don't you think that that would likewise raise some pretty significant eyebrows?
Answer to question is yes it would or at least it should because of this hysteria.
You didn't understand my point, that is why other side of the coin is more valuable than other?
I.e. Reactionary postureBecause these things are just nice gestures that get forgotten immediately because everyone does it. Specifically signaling out your opposition to a thoroughly benign cause shows an inherently level of being a jackass by the individual doing it that draws far more attention than the initial kind gesture.
Very unique. I like it.
I.e. Reactionary posture
If it pisses enough people off that Comcast cares about, Comcast is going to care. Provorov is well within his rights to say or do as he wishes. His actions and beliefs having consequences goes hand in hand with that.I.e. Reactionary posture
You could believe that he doesn't have to wear anything (and he, in fact, wasn't forced to wear anything!), but to say that not wearing it DOESN'T make him a hateful bigot is just not true."You better wear this or you're a monster" is hardly the same thing as supporting the LGTBQ community. You can think they deserve love and respect, treat them accordingly when you encounter them out in the world, and not be a hateful bigot while also not want to be forced to wear something.