GDT: NHL 24 Draft Combine June 3-8 NOT the trade, roster or KK thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,474
30,344
Ottawa
Hugues literally said we were picking a forward , dont even know why we debate on another d-man.

This team has pretty much nothing in the pipeline offensively since they went the popcorn route last draft. What's the point to draft another dman when people barely want to get rid of Savard or Matheson

If we can't make a def from Guhle Hutson Jackeye Mailloux , Reinbacher , Struble and Barron . Then perhaps the problem is somewhere else and not because we don't have enough young dmen in the org.
What Hughes literally said was that “all things being equal” they're picking a forward.

Which means it depends who the teams ahead of the Habs pick and whose available at that point.

IMO, if Demidov and Lindstrom go in the top 4…don’t rule out a Dman.
 
Last edited:

BergevinBurner

Registered User
Sep 27, 2019
1,894
4,427
We already know Bobrov has a hard-on for unicorns, I can't imagine how excited he got interviewing a pegasus 😅

Iginla seems like he's a good interview though, he carries himself very well for someone his age and seems like he'd fit into the culture they're building. If Lindstrom isn't an option then I feel like Iginla is probably going to be their guy.
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,870
6,049
We already know Bobrov has a hard-on for unicorns, I can't imagine how excited he got interviewing a pegasus 😅

Iginla seems like he's a good interview though, he carries himself very well for someone his age and seems like he'd fit into the culture they're building. If Lindstrom isn't an option then I feel like Iginla is probably going to be their guy.

It wont be popular but i would be ecstatic if we drafted Lindstrom at 5 and trade Guhle for a pick that can land Iginla.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BehindTheTimes

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,192
2,682
Oakville, ON
Hugues literally said we were picking a forward , dont even know why we debate on another d-man.

This team has pretty much nothing in the pipeline offensively since they went the popcorn route last draft. What's the point to draft another dman when people barely want to get rid of Savard or Matheson

If we can't make a def from Guhle Hutson Jackeye Mailloux , Reinbacher , Struble and Barron . Then perhaps the problem is somewhere else and not because we don't have enough young dmen in the org.
the point is, if two of the forwards (demidov or Lindstrom) are taken by 5th, you do NOT not draft one of the stud Dmen (because, you need a forward) - thats like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

Basically, we are walking away with 1 of the following:
Demidov, Lindstrom, Dickinson or Levshunov... ainec for the remaining options. any of these 4, and our tank was worth it.
 

ZUKI

I hate the haters...
Oct 23, 2003
14,240
4,644
montreal
For their 2nd meal, he's wondering if they should go back to Mendy's. If you go to Mendy's, you're guaranteed a good meal.



You can also flip Slafkovsky and Suzuki for top 10 picks easy. We can draft them all.
Should at least get 12-15 top selections ; 2023 and 2024 pics only, to finally end all the " he doesn't fit with Habs window" .
 

SwiftyHab

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 18, 2004
4,872
9,542
Platinum Member


IMG_1481.jpeg
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,192
2,682
Oakville, ON
Beaudoin or Boisvert would be a good pick with Winnipeg’s #26.
I like Boivert, but its a toss up if he can become a top 6 C.. id rather throw expendable assets to m8ve up 10 spots and draft that forward that might have slipped or the one they want - the value to move up 10 spots far outpaces the need to wait, and its entirely possible that Boivert might be that gem in 3-5 years...
To mark the end of our "rebuild" and hang up the tank hats, it is imperative we come out of the first round with a sure fire top 6 F (prospect or player) and a top 4 D (dickinson or Levshunov)
 

McGees

Registered User
Jun 15, 2016
13,732
27,272
Athletic podcast think:
- think Levshunov to Hawks.
- Demidov some teams unsure about MHL only play and SKA being sketchy
- Lindstrom likely top 5, could be a CBJ pick
- Iggy more a 8-15 type player
- Catton deserves to be a top 10 pick but could slip because of size.
- Boisvert is valued for his intangibles.

Also for the record I think Wheeler is a weenie.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,025
72,568
Texas
Athletic podcast think:
- think Levshunov to Hawks.
- Demidov some teams unsure about MHL play and SKA being sketchy
- Lindstrom likely top 5, could be a CBJ pick
- Iggy more a 8-15 type player
- Catton deserves to be a top 10 pick but could slip because of size.
- Boisvert is valued for his intangibles.

Also for the record I think Wheeler is a weenie.
Yep when it comes to Demidov you better be sure.
 

River Meadow

Registered User
Mar 29, 2016
7,002
9,387
The more I learn about him, the more I think he has it all. I just find him more complete than Lindstrom.

Then you factor in, Lindstrom's bad back (which apparently isn't 100% right now) and the fact that he didn't play a full season...

Iginla meanwhile played great...

Forget the 3inches, who is actually a better hockey player, Lindstrom or Iginla.....

Tough call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garnet76
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $613.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $52,170.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $155.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad