Confirmed with Link: [MTL/TB] Sergachev/Drouin II

Status
Not open for further replies.
See my post above, thats too much spent on wingers, Habs cant afford to spend another 6M on Radulov when we have no clue if Drouin or Galchenyuk can do the job down the middle.. To me its clear Radu isnt coming back unless Bergevin has some other crazy moves in the work..

We have the cap space to sign Radu and Chucky...

We would be loaded on the wings... :laugh:

Maybe Bergevin is going to invent something new here, win with loaded wings and defensive responsible centers. :naughty:
 
In fact, if Tampa handle the situation well, they could sign Sergachev to a 8 yrs deal when he is about 24 yrs old, what leads to 32 years old in the same organization.. Why didnt Bergevin sign Drouin for 8 yrs instead of 6 exactly?? I dont understand the logic??

Because it's easier to commit yourself long term towards a 28 year old than a 30 year old. The maximum contract would lead him to 36 yeasrs old instead of 38. Huge difference. Also you would be paying for better quality years over the length of that contract. Pretty simple logic if you ask me :dunno:
 
Drouin had the lowest +/- with the Lightning, last season. How does this not look bad for attempting to improve Canadiens defence, next season?

I mean it's... It's not about that... At all. You know what I'm saying I mean... But it's...it's easy to, to talk about... It's easy to sum it up when you're just talking about plus/minus. We're sitting in here, and Drouin's supposed to be the new franchise centre, and we in here talking about plus/minus. I mean, listen, we're talking about plus/minus, not a game, not a game, not a game, we talking about plus/minus. Not a game. Not, not … Not the game that he goes out there and die for and play every game like it's his last. Not the game, but we're talking about plus/minus, man. I mean, how silly is that? … And we talking about plus/minus. I know its a stat thats there. I know NHL.com uses it as an example... I know that... And I'm not.. I'm not shoving it aside, you know, like it don't mean anything. I know it's important, I do. I honestly do... But we're talking about plus/minus, plus/minus man. What are we talking about? plus/minus? We're talking about plus/minus, man. We're talking about plus/minus. We're talking about plus/minus. We ain't talking about the game. We're talking about plus/minus, man. When you come to the arena, and you see Drouin play, you see him play don't you? You've seen him give everything he got, right? But we're talking about plus/minus right now. We talking about plus/minus....

Man look, I hear you... it's funny to me too, I mean it's strange... it's strange to me too, but we're talking about plus/minus man, we're not even talking about the game... the actual game, when it matters... We're talking about plus/minus…
 
Last edited:
I mean it's... It's not about that... At all. You know what I'm saying I mean... But it's...it's easy … to, to talk about... It's easy to sum it up when you're just talking about plus/minus. We're sitting in here, and Drouin's supposed to be the new franchise player, and we in here talking about plus/minus. I mean, listen, we're talking about plus/minus, not a game, not a game, not a game, we talking about plus/minus. Not a game. Not, not … Not the game that he goes out there and die for and play every game like it's his last. Not the game, but we're talking about plus/minus, man. I mean, how silly is that? … And we talking about plus/minus. I know its a stat thats there. I know NHL.com uses it as an example... I know that... And I'm not.. I'm not shoving it aside, you know, like it don't mean anything. I know it's important, I do. I honestly do... But we're talking about practice plus/minus man. What are we talking about? plus/minus? We're talking about plus/minus, man. We're talking about plus/minus. We're talking about plus/minus. We ain't talking about the game. We're talking about plus/minus, man. When you come to the arena, and you see Drouin play, you see him play don't you? You've seen him give everything he got, right? But we're talking about plus/minus right now. We talking about plus/minus....

Man look, I hear you... it's funny to me too, I mean it's strange... it's strange to me too, but we're talking about plus/minus man, we're not even talking about the game... the actual game, when it matters... We're talking about plus/minus …

Did you hit your head? :help:
 
Yeah honestly I wouldn't look too much into the +/-, sometimes it is representative, sometimes it just turn out that way for whatever circumstances, either way Drouin has off the chart offensive IQ/poise/creativity and puck skill this is what we got, Drouin isn't the all around player who you also put on your PK, well I'm fine with that, we have plenty of those, maximize his usage in the O zone, we struggle badly to create scoring offense, Drouin will help greatly in this regard. In the end, I am sure Drouin is able to create way more offensive chances than cost us on the defensive side of things.
 
Has Shot Suppression stats are actually above average.... not great, not even very good... just slightly above average.

In other words, not a world beater defensively, but not a liability either.

On the Hero Chart, he's a 6/10. Chuck is a 2/10. (5 = average, 10 = elite).
 
Has Shot Suppression stats are actually above average.... not great, not even very good... just slightly above average.

In other words, not a world beater defensively, but not a liability either.

On the Hero Chart, he's a 6/10. Chuck is a 2/10. (5 = average, 10 = elite).

Are you telling me there's a chance he plays center?
 
im trying to wrap my head around this.
We get rid of PK because he's to big for the team, ego wtv and we trade and sign for drouin and even bigger headcase?

Great MB figured out a way to stay on as GM for another few years. Get a high potential flop of a french canadian to take everyones mind away.

****ing mcdonagh trade all over again, i mean not as bad, but good buy top 10 nhl dman for someones used condom.
 
im trying to wrap my head around this.
We get rid of PK because he's to big for the team, ego wtv and we trade and sign for drouin and even bigger headcase?

Great MB figured out a way to stay on as GM for another few years. Get a high potential flop of a french canadian to take everyones mind away.

****ing mcdonagh trade all over again, i mean not as bad, but good buy top 10 nhl dman for someones used condom.

I'm right with you man. You know what I hate the most about this trade? Drouin is an over the hill has been immature son of a ***** at 22.

Ughhh Hate Bergevin with all my guts. Let's start a march or something.
 
Looks like it's going to be Galchenyuk.

Hoping it'll be Pacioretty.

Just use Galchenyuk as a C and live with the growing pains.

If we have to put someone at center then put the guy that can actually pass the puck and make plays! Chucky's a shooter he should play wing.
 
Meanwhile at HF, we will do it at "the drop of a hat"

Who's "we"? The vast majority of HF posters are loving this deal. Why make a generality out of the few who have a different opinion, which they're entitled to anyway. You'll never have a fully unanimous approval on anything, it comes with the territory of making a decision where the team is giving up something of value to get something of value.

Best take on this move is the post that argued how this trade fills a sore need for the Habs, regardless of whether Sergachev has a better career than Drouin or not. Lack of offense has been a glaring need for the longest time. While it's difficult to ask for the perfect deal (like an offensive contributor who happens to be a C), this one comes damn close. The PP will get a huge shot in the arm. And Drouin will get to improve under a patient, nurturing coach like Claude Julien, not a punishing tyrant like his predecessor.
 
If we have to put someone at center then put the guy that can actually pass the puck and make plays! Chucky's a shooter he should play wing.

Chucky can pass the puck alright... I disagree with the notion he's a shooter. He can do pretty much anything in the offensive zone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad