KreamofAskarov
Here for fun
I doubt this.
Look at it this way. If they think Weber is going to fall off before the end of the deal, they either penalize themselves by overpaying Weber for a few seasons, or they trade him now and eventually penalize themselves with cap recapture.
They were going to get hurt somehow with that contract either way, it was just a matter of time.
Nashville is a contender. They had a chance to swap Weber for at the very least a comparable player who is a few years younger, fits better with the age of their group, and is closer to his prime than Weber. He also costs less real money than Weber right now.
The most likely scenario is that Weber retires in 7 years when he is nearly 40 and his compensation drops to 1M. Nashville couldn't just pass up that opportunity in fear of getting hurt by cap recapture in 7 years. 7 years down the road is a very long time.
Although I doubt they've thought about it this far or are really worrying about it....because as I said, 7 years is a very long time away in hockey years, but with the age of their core players, they could time things so that they could blow things up and rebuild in time for that cap recapture albatross. Most of their key players are in their mid 20s right now.
The Subban trade basically gives them 7 years to make it worth it by winning a cup.
There is no way the league will let a small market team get penalized for 28 mil in cap hits. Especially from a rule that was created AFTER the deal was signed.