Still not a sex offender in either country, by law.
True, but brushing off his charge as simply "Offensive Photography and Defamation" is misleading on what that charge actual entails in Swedish law - its their revenge porn charge
Still not a sex offender in either country, by law.
- He'd be a youth offenderHe was fined $2000 CAD by that court of law. He's lucky he didn't do it Canada where its a criminal sexual assault offense.
His story isn't as widely publicized, he becomes a 3rd or later round pick in his draft year, or he doesn't get drafted, or he doesn't get signed at all after the draft and becomes a re-entry, then he gets signed to a league-minimum ELC instead of a near-Max. There are various ways his case turns into a "redemption" path instead of... well, basically identical to the best-case progression that would otherwise have happened just the same if he had made no mistake at all! He's still on exactly the same path he would have been if he had done nothing whatsoever. Aside from the PR attention. He has suffered nothing whatsoever in terms of income or career trajectory.What are the consequences for Mailloux in that scenario? Which was the crux of your argument.
If it hapened in Canada, we would've never know about it.He was fined $2000 CAD by that court of law. He's lucky he didn't do it Canada where its a criminal sexual assault offense.
But it wasn't revenge porn either, that's atleast equally misleading. The guy tried to show off in a very immature way, not thinking about the impact for the girl. He didn't do it with the intention of destroying her reputation or get revenge for something.True, but brushing off his charge as simply "Offensive Photography and Defamation" is misleading on what that charge actual entails in Swedish law - its their revenge porn charge
"Offensive photography" is a charge in Swedish law that they use almost exclusively for cases where people photograph sexual acts or nudity without consent.
If he was convicted with an equivalent charge in Canada, he would be a sex offender
Perhaps it would be better to educate kids as oppose to scare them... If they understand why it's bad to do such things as oppose to avoid doing it because of the consequences?His story isn't as widely publicized, he becomes a 3rd or later round pick in his draft year, or he doesn't get drafted, or he doesn't get signed at all after the draft and becomes a re-entry, then he gets signed to a league-minimum ELC instead of a near-Max. There are various ways his case turns into a "redemption" path instead of... well, basically identical to the best-case progression that would otherwise have happened just the same if he had made no mistake at all! He's still on exactly the same path he would have been if he had done nothing whatsoever. Aside from the PR attention. He has suffered nothing whatsoever in terms of income or career trajectory.
It's not even that relevant to Mailloux as an individual since he does seem to be suitably remorseful. But as a deterrant to future cases... it could be useful to tell the world that hey, if you mess up, there are at least some consequences to that, other than just people talking about you on internet message boards.
If it hapened in Canada, we would've never know about it.
But it wasn't revenge porn either, that's atleast equally misleading. The guy tried to show off in a very immature way, not thinking about the impact for the girl. He didn't do it with the intention of destroying her reputation or get revenge for something.
His story isn't as widely publicized, he becomes a 3rd or later round pick in his draft year, or he doesn't get drafted, or he doesn't get signed at all after the draft and becomes a re-entry, then he gets signed to a league-minimum ELC instead of a near-Max. There are various ways his case turns into a "redemption" path instead of... well, basically identical to the best-case progression that would otherwise have happened just the same if he had made no mistake at all! He's still on exactly the same path he would have been if he had done nothing whatsoever. Aside from the PR attention. He has suffered nothing whatsoever in terms of income or career trajectory.
It's not even that relevant to Mailloux as an individual since he does seem to be suitably remorseful. But as a deterrant to future cases... it could be useful to tell the world that hey, if you mess up, there are at least some consequences to that, other than just people talking about you on internet message boards.
Incorrect, since he was a minor we would have never known about it since we don't publicly disclose names of minors who commit crimes and also to be a sex offender he would have had to be 18 by Canadian laws.
True but that doesn't make it right or acceptable. Mailloux was 17 soon to be 18 and at that age you know the difference between right and wrong and how a young woman should be treated. I'm not saying he should pay for his mistake for the rest of his life but drafting him in the first round and then signing him to a $2,775,000 NHL contract a year later definitely sends the wrong message. NHL teams should strive to be better than that. They and their players are held in high esteem by millions of youngsters throughout North America and Europe.- He'd be a youth offender
- His name wouldn't have been disclosed
- More importantly perhaps, this whole incident would've been hushed hushed and there wouldn't have been any kind of prosecution over it because, hey, he's a hockey player.
He faced the consequences in Sweden. He was suspended by the OHL. He was not allowed to participate in last year's training camp...what other consequences would you bring down on this person (a minor at the time) to punish him further??? Put it in the context of others playing in the NHL who did worse and got nothing!Why would I have to lay out the road to that? The burden is on him. Has the victim acknowledged he has actually given an effective apology and atonement? Last I saw she received a meager text message and did not feel he has earned her acceptance.
In the meantime he’s faced no real consequence— he’s drafted and he still gets his money after playing 12 games. That’s privilege.
A sex offender is someone who has committed a sex crime. That can be anyone over the age of 14 in Canada. You're right he wouldn't be on a sex offender registry because he was under 18 at the age of his crime
That's what I meant. I meant that there are pros and cons. They shouldn't have drafted him, that was pretty much inexcusable at the time, even just considering his own request and the alternative available talent. At least everybody agrees on that. But signing him now As If That Was The Right Decision... is just kinda perpetuating that mistake? They just signed him to the same deal he would have gotten if he was legitimately The Right Pick at the end of the NHL 1st round. How does that acknowledge in any way that any mistake was made?Wide publicity isn't exactly a positive in his case, and frankly, his signing won't be a bigger story than his drafting (because more than a year passed) and him being re-drafted would be a story too.
Montreal really, really shouldn't have drafted him. Don't get me wrong on that.
That's probably not what you want to do. That's why Watson in the NFL is currently serving a suspension of less than 2 quarters per masseuse he victimized.He faced the consequences in Sweden. He was suspended by the OHL. He was not allowed to participate in last year's training camp...what other consequences would you bring down on this person (a minor at the time) to punish him further??? Put it in the context of others playing in the NHL who did worse and got nothing!
People are calling him out like he's a rapist its pretty damning. Not a fan of what he did but the % of young men who do this is probably high. Sex pics are at a all time high and kids start sending them younger and younger its gross but its a reality of our society. I don't think the guys life should be ruined.Can we include a mod warning in the OP containing all the correct info of what Mailloux did and start thread banning people who are misrepresenting it?
I've seen he was over 18 he wasn't, the girl was under 18 she wasn't, he committed sexual assault he didn't. This is getting absurd.
This is not the right context to put it in, the NHL is a swamp that should strive for better and never will if we keep saying "could be worse".He faced the consequences in Sweden. He was suspended by the OHL. He was not allowed to participate in last year's training camp...what other consequences would you bring down on this person (a minor at the time) to punish him further??? Put it in the context of others playing in the NHL who did worse and got nothing!
I don't think I've seen any information saying there was : " intention of destroying her reputation"Actually he did do it with the intention of destroying her reputation. That's where the "defamation" part of the charge comes in and what he was found guilty of.
NHL teams should strive to be better than that. They and their players are held in high esteem by millions of youngsters throughout North America and Europe.
... Man, I found your post legitimately funny AND now I feel really bad about it.That's probably not what you want to do. That's why Watson in the NFL is currently serving a suspension of less than 2 quarters per masseuse he victimized.
That it wasn't a Canadian court doesn't make it any less legitimate. He was put on a registry. There are all manner of things that are punished differently, from one country to the next. Sweden deemed it suitable. You can let your angst skew it however you want.He was fined $2000 CAD by that court of law. He's lucky he didn't do it Canada where its a criminal sexual assault offense.