Tripod
I hate this team
"Similar offensive numbers"Yeah, but have you stopped to consider defense?
....is what I am comparing.
"Similar offensive numbers"Yeah, but have you stopped to consider defense?
Frost 41 ES pts, 18 ES goals
Cates 28 ES pts, 9 ES goals
Cates gets bigger contract, Frost gets called a toilet seat
this fkn kid is so good. red means good right?
Funny stuff coming from a guy who claims Sanheim sucks despite all this blue.
ive said several times sanheim has every chance to still earn his contract, hes just not a 1st pair guy
not sure how insulting me helps make Sanheim a better player or strengthens your argument about Frost but youre a child and you say childish things and im no longer interested in continuing this conversation with youDue to injury, Frost only played 55 games and had 16 points in the first season covered in that rating. Everyone here is well aware of his struggles to produce during that time and early last season when he was getting 4th line usage. He also got a very modest contract, so I have no idea what point you thought you were making with that post, outside of proving once again that you belong with the dullards on the Flyers Facebook group.
Funny stuff coming from a guy who claims Sanheim sucks despite all this blue. I’m guessing you didn’t even notice these ratings cover a 3 year sample.
sounds like Cates need moar good minutes to me.Oh, from the ALL IMPORTANT DEC 7TH ONWARD where stats REALLY matter:
Frost 36 ES pts....led the team
Cates 22 ES pts.....5th on the team....less than even JVR
Bill's on the case.I’m sure @VladDrag has something to say about Frost’s WAR not being accurately representative/predictive of his microstats and in-season growth.
IDK its pretty close
I'm not defending the management so much as I am pointing out the silliness of the complaint. You have two players that are similar in terms of what they have done in the NHL. One is better at offense and one is better at defense. Last season they had similar production. I am not certain how you are breaking it down between 2C and 4C rate but it must be based on something other than points per game because if you look at points per game Cates has higher PPG pace than Frost does during his career. They also have the same oiGF/60 and similar GF/60 over their career, Frost doing better last year than Cates who was in his first full season. You also have to factor in the defense. It is amazing to see the shift from the days of defensive forwards are a premium position and should be coveted to now saying that because Morgan Frost had a decent season offensively that he should be making more than Cates, whos cored 8 fewer points and played better defense. It is just a weird position to take while also again at the same time being upset with the Flyers for signing someone you clearly think is better to a more favorable deal. It's almost like...wait for it...you are complaining just for the sake of complaining.No. I can stop you right there.
One produced at a 2C rate. The other produced at a 4C rate.
I can also remind you that every time you defend the team's management and give them this benefit of the doubt, it has ended up being wrong. It's all the same people doing all the same stuff. They don't deserve optimism.
the same oiGF/60 and similar GF/60
Frost is about the only player that Bill doesn’t toe the company line on.Bill sticking up for Frost is something I didn’t expect. I don’t mind the 2 year deal. It seems this is a league wide trend with younger players. I hope he continues to build off the 2nd half of last season
I'm not defending the management so much as I am pointing out the silliness of the complaint. You have two players that are similar in terms of what they have done in the NHL. One is better at offense and one is better at defense. Last season they had similar production. I am not certain how you are breaking it down between 2C and 4C rate but it must be based on something other than points per game because if you look at points per game Cates has higher PPG pace than Frost does during his career. They also have the same oiGF/60 and similar GF/60 over their career, Frost doing better last year than Cates who was in his first full season. You also have to factor in the defense. It is amazing to see the shift from the days of defensive forwards are a premium position and should be coveted to now saying that because Morgan Frost had a decent season offensively that he should be making more than Cates, whos cored 8 fewer points and played better defense. It is just a weird position to take while also again at the same time being upset with the Flyers for signing someone you clearly think is better to a more favorable deal. It's almost like...wait for it...you are complaining just for the sake of complaining.
If the Flyers signed a better player to a more favorable deal, that should be something to celebrate, no? Even if for some reason you believe they did it as an insult or that they don't know what they are doing or they accidentally did it beause they don't think he is as good as you think he is, wtf ever the reason is, he is signed to a cheaper deal. If he outplays that deal, he'll get more money on the next one. If he doesn't, we'll see where that takes us.
yeah i agree, i dont understand what exactly is the negativity with this deal because if he plays bad, he's gone, if he plays great at the end of deal he gets resigned for more. like resigning him to a big contract is just crazy and somehow i think fans just want him here long term and not care if he plays good or bad.I'm not defending the management so much as I am pointing out the silliness of the complaint. You have two players that are similar in terms of what they have done in the NHL. One is better at offense and one is better at defense. Last season they had similar production. I am not certain how you are breaking it down between 2C and 4C rate but it must be based on something other than points per game because if you look at points per game Cates has higher PPG pace than Frost does during his career. They also have the same oiGF/60 and similar GF/60 over their career, Frost doing better last year than Cates who was in his first full season. You also have to factor in the defense. It is amazing to see the shift from the days of defensive forwards are a premium position and should be coveted to now saying that because Morgan Frost had a decent season offensively that he should be making more than Cates, whos cored 8 fewer points and played better defense. It is just a weird position to take while also again at the same time being upset with the Flyers for signing someone you clearly think is better to a more favorable deal. It's almost like...wait for it...you are complaining just for the sake of complaining.
If the Flyers signed a better player to a more favorable deal, that should be something to celebrate, no? Even if for some reason you believe they did it as an insult or that they don't know what they are doing or they accidentally did it beause they don't think he is as good as you think he is, wtf ever the reason is, he is signed to a cheaper deal. If he outplays that deal, he'll get more money on the next one. If he doesn't, we'll see where that takes us.
Yeah but have you considered Cates is good at defending? That absolves his terrible production, somehow.Since Dec 7th, because that's the date that matters:
Frost was 37th in the league in ES pts....1 behind Crosby, 1 ahead of BTkackuk
Cates was 177th in the league in ES pts....1 behind JVR, 1 ahead of Engvall
This is not similar production. And it's this type of gap that shows Frost's upside is SO much more than Cates. They should have locked him up long term and then do their best to keep growing that offensive upside. Instead, they will give him 3rd line wingers while Cates gets better offensive ones, and they will bitch that he doesn't produce as much. And pat themselves on the back for giving him a bridge and not committing long term.
The Tortorella Effect:
Weird, it says 1st pair TOI and performance here over a large sample?
It's also a year out of date. Opps.