Nathaniel Skywalker
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2013
- 14,105
- 5,740
Injuries while leading the league in scoring 3 timesWhat’s Crosby’s excuse for winning one Art Ross past the age of 19?
Injuries while leading the league in scoring 3 timesWhat’s Crosby’s excuse for winning one Art Ross past the age of 19?
Because of the health factor, I’d take Crosby, taking the health factor out, it’s a pickemBedard hit 61 points, at 18, while missing 14 games and playing on an awful team.
If he plays a full season I think he could hit 90 points.
Crosby should be good for 85-90 this year.
It'll come down to health but I expect very similar PPG.
What’s Crosby’s excuse for winning one Art Ross past the age of 19?
I took Crosby in this poll but the more I think about the more I think that Bedard will take off this year and end up with 50ish goals and 110ish points.
The lack of support last year and physical immaturity (lack of being a top 5% skater) really obscures for some on how good he really is.
Injuries obviously. Considering he lead the league in points per game six times.What’s Crosby’s excuse for winning one Art Ross past the age of 19?
The fact that he won an Art Ross at 19 suggests he’s definitely winning at least two more in his early 20s, but bad timing with injuries held him back.
Let’s not fool ourselves here.
That poster knows the answer, but he'll quickly dismiss it as just excuses. So I'm not sure why they bothered asking a question they knew the answer to and already disagreed with other than to take a dig at Crosby.Injuries while leading the league in scoring 3 times
Compared to last year, teravainen, bertuzzi, and hall presumably won’t miss the whole the season. Ilya Mikhehev to a lesser extent. Some prospects got more seasoning as well - nazar, reichel, dach might make an impact. They will still be bad just not lacking nhl talent like they were last year.I’m not up to date with Chicago’s roster, who do they really got this year to help?