The 2014/2015 & 2015/2016 seasons are the reason why I very much doubt Crosby could’ve sustained his 2011-2013 pace over the whole season.
Crosby 2010/2011: 66p/41g=1.61
Crosby 2011/2012: 37/22 = 1.682
Crosby 2013: 56/36 = 1.556
Crosby 2014: 104/80 = 1.3
Crosby 2015: 84/77 = 1.0909
Crosby 2016: 85/80 = 1.0625
League scoring averages: GPG
2011: 2.73
2012: 2.66
2013: 2.65
2014: 2.67
2015: 2.66
2016: 2.67
The league-wide scoring has barely changed, but Crosby’s PPG has decreased massively in the actual full seasons he played. Even in his amazing 2014 season, 1.3 is still a huge dip from the 1.61 he was pacing in 2011 & 1.68 in 2012. It’s not like his injuries completely changed him, like the leg injury completely changed Stamkos skating and acceleration.
If we define an NHL athletes peak from 23-27, the drop in Crosby’s production shouldn’t have been that massive. Crosby was 27 in 2015, very much in his peak. The drop from 132 point pace in 2011 to a 89 point pace in 2015 at age 27 just doesn’t add up. Or how about 127 pace in 2013 to 89 in 2015. The scoring hasn’t changed at all, but in two years Crosby’s production massively falls off?. Shows how his pace wasn’t sustainable.
I don’t understand how Crosby is given full credit for a level of play he wasn’t able to show for an entire season. I believe that 2013-2014 was actually the absolute peak level Crosby could have accomplished. Before I get flamed by Pens fans, Crosby is still a top five player all time(for now) despite the injuries.