Of course, but what other first traded last deadline weren't protected?
Florida traded their 2024 1st and protected that one.
Both 1sts for Hagel are top 10 protected.
Floridas 2022 1st was top 10 protected.
1st for Toffoli was top 10 protected.
1st for Eichel top 10 protected
1st for Keumper was top 10 protected.
Practically every 1st traded beyond last year was top 10 protected. Florida's is the only one that I can find that wasnt. There was like 1 2022 1st traded at the deadline that wasnt protected (Boston's 1st for Lindholm) but they were already comfortably in a playoff spot.
Its almost the standard now to top 10 protect trades, so I really don't think it would influence the value that much. And youre trading for Ben f***ing Chiarot, even the 1st in the Eichel trade was top 10 protected. Florida caught themselves in a pinch already top 10 protecting their 2022 first and 2024 first before trading away their 2023 first for Chiarot. Just horrible gming and asset management.
As others have mentioned you also have the Duchene and Karlsson trades turning out pretty lopsided due to not lottery protecting 1sts. If the 1st involved for Eichel can be top 10 protected, im sure a 1st for Ben Chiarot could have as well.
Would love to see them get burned for the incompetence.
Idk if someone answered already but I think the answer is simply... the Panthers drew themselves in a corner.
Florida had traded a ton of futures already, including their 2022 pick, top 10 protected.
When they traded for Chiarot though, I doubt they were worried about that. But they also had a deal for Giroux coming that involved the 2024 pick.
Well my guess is twofold;
1- Other teams were interested in Ben Chiarot, and with the Panthers looking so hot, their 2023 pick didnt look great. They probably thought they were fine for at least the next year
2- the team was lining up to acquire Claude Giroux, and traded the 2024 pick in the deal. Not protecting 2023 might have been done to keep that 2024 pick's value - after all if the 2023 is protected, then becomes the 2024, the 2024 becomes 2025 etc.
But yeah, at the end of the day, they'd have been better using tthat 2023 unprotected on like, Giroux and skip on Chiarot... but NHL GM's love their big D man with playoff experience