TheOrangeDesk
Registered User
- May 27, 2015
- 1,224
- 1,699
will it make you feel better if I replace "all" with "most"?even in the link you provided not all habs fans are saying he deserved a first. Go away.
will it make you feel better if I replace "all" with "most"?even in the link you provided not all habs fans are saying he deserved a first. Go away.
backtracking eh?? replace "most" with "some" and you will be close to accurate. the problem with habs haters is that the generalization gene is on full throttle. It is always your kinds' downfall! Case closed.will it make you feel better if I replace "all" with "most"?
No kidding. This is insane.oh Frank how far you have fallen
not backtracking just didnt think a maniac habs fan would take every word so literally. of course every single fan in a fanbase doesn't think the exact same thing, I figured that was common-sense and didnt need to be specified. I actually dont give a sh*t about habs, their team has been meh to bad for the last 2 decades (besides a fluke covid run). I jus think there are a lot of habs fans who are very passionate but clueless about hockey outside Montreal.backtracking eh?? replace "most" with "some" and you will be close to accurate. the problem with habs haters is that the generalization gene is on full throttle. It is always your kinds' downfall! Case closed.
Since you're knowledgeable and other people are not what is Monahan then?so much for those who think Monahan is a 3rd/4th line depth winger at best. The BS we hear from "knowledgeable" posters is breathtaking.
they actually checked with scans and Monahan has a brain.
take every word literally?? there are many little smart *sses like you who come here and say EVERY HABS FANS THINK just because they saw a random comment somewhere. You think you are cute and smart generalizing as if Habs fans are one collective brain...we are not and i can say that most of us are infinitely more knowledgeable than your type. All teams are bad at some time so nobody gives a **** what your opinion of our team is. Worry about your team and hope that someday your franchise can even come within a ****hair of being a fraction as successful as the Habs have been to hockey!not backtracking just didnt think a maniac habs fan would take every word so literally. of course every single fan in a fanbase doesn't think the exact same thing, I figured that was common-sense and didnt need to be specified. I actually dont give a sh*t about habs, their team has been meh to bad for the last 2 decades (besides a fluke covid run). I jus think there are a lot of habs fans who are very passionate but clueless about hockey outside Montreal.
He literally broke his back and came back crappy. Still got a third for a broken player. I've gotta say the most intellectually deficient and dishonest posters seem to gravitate towards Habs player value threads to cite examples of farsical situations in which the Habs didn't get fair value for obvious reasons.like the habs fans last year thinking they'd get a 1st for edmundson?
If we're talking about reality, then I would suggest going back and seeing that with every claim regarding Edmunsson or Monahan at the time, it was always directly or indirectly qualified with "if he came back and was healthy and returned to what he was like before the injuries".still ignoring reality then hey?
he is a middle six center. Look at his stats and compare to other available centers on the market for $2M dollars (less at this point). Can I help you with other simple issues like this?Since you're knowledgeable and other people are not what is Monahan then?
What is the non BS about Monahan?
he literally missed 3/4 of the year prior. injuries had already massively decreased his value when habs fans were claiming he was worth a 1st. weird I was also just thinking there's a lot of intellectually deficient and dishonest posters in habs threads too.........He literally broke his back and came back crappy. Still got a third for a broken player. I've gotta say the most intellectually deficient and dishonest posters seem to gravitate towards Habs player value threads to cite examples of farsical situations in which the Habs didn't get fair value for obvious reasons.
Agree on this part.take every word literally?? there are many little smart *sses like you who come here and say EVERY HABS FANS THINK just because they saw a random comment somewhere. You think you are cute and smart generalizing as if Habs fans are one collective brain...we are not ...
The consensus about Monahan among Habs fans seems to be to expect a 2nd and a prospect, or a 2nd and 3d. Winnipeg has an advantage if they'll give Montreal their own 2nd rounder back, since it'll be far before other available 2nds.Some good rentals have gone for less than the (unconditional) 1st round premium in recent years. In 2019, Dzingel (~64 point pace) and Nyquist (~63 point pace) didn't get it; Zuccarello (~66 point pace) returned conditional 1sts that weren't transferred. In 2020, Lehner was a year removed from a Vezina nomination and only returned a 2nd as the base piece. Hall still had some name value in 2021. 2022 was Manson (premium style RHD), Rakell (name value) and Giordano (leadership/name value); Copp (C on pace for ~51 points) returned a modest probability conditional pick that ended up being transferred. 2023 was Domi (~67 point pace); Kane's 1st was a modest probability conditional that didn't end up being transferred. 2024 has already seen Flames fans disappointed with the return for Zadorov.
And we're in an era of aggressiveness. The market could decide to pull back to early 00s to mid 10s conservatism as these trades continue to fall flat. Monahan's not sniffing that return 10 years ago.
I don't see a slam dunk here either way. He's nothing special, but he can play a premium position and the rental market is pretty shallow. It's borderline. Such a passionate debate is unusual under those circumstances.
Also, you can take solace, if your team does end up giving it up, that the player the Habs select is unlikely to be a meaningful asset in the future. Just the odds at that point of the draft.
Fans bash players with out really watching them. It the hive mentality. Nurse get bashed all the time. Yet if fans took the time to look at the competition he faces and the D partners he been saddle with they would see him as a very good number 2D. He been playing like a number 1 since the Knob poked him(lol, I had to)I haven't seen enough to call him a number 1 yet.There's a lot of talk of "depth winger" to belittle his value, yet he'd be the 4th highest scoring forward on Winnipeg's current roster, and that's without getting any kind of quality linemates in Montreal...
Or like everyone who watch MTL, they knows he's been amongst MTL best players this year and he's producing more then Lindholm while playing with worst players.It's a pretty impressive display of begging the question. "If I assume that Monahan is good defensively, what number can I find to support this?"
Neat. I'm sure that has a positive effect on his ability to minimize scoring chances against.Or like everyone who watch MTL, they knows he's been amongst MTL best players this year and he's producing more then Lindholm while playing with worst players.
I am not a Montreal and I just read the first page and there not that many Montreal fans posting (4 or 5) and even then not all were asking for a first.its been 2 minutes since your last post. chill out.
here you go:
Hey we said the same thing with Chiarot and guess what, he was worth a 1st apparently.he literally missed 3/4 of the year prior. injuries had already massively decreased his value when habs fans were claiming he was worth a 1st. weird I was also just thinking there's a lot of intellectually deficient and dishonest posters in habs threads too.........
"farcical situation" you mean like habs fans thinking they'll get a 1st for Edmundson or Monahan?
See who we get in this upcoming draft first before we decide who to trade for. I would take the pick for now
The most reasonable answer here.Some good rentals have gone for less than the (unconditional) 1st round premium in recent years. In 2019, Dzingel (~64 point pace) and Nyquist (~63 point pace) didn't get it; Zuccarello (~66 point pace) returned conditional 1sts that weren't transferred. In 2020, Lehner was a year removed from a Vezina nomination and only returned a 2nd as the base piece. Hall still had some name value in 2021. 2022 was Manson (premium style RHD), Rakell (name value) and Giordano (leadership/name value); Copp (C on pace for ~51 points) returned a modest probability conditional pick that ended up being transferred. 2023 was Domi (~67 point pace); Kane's 1st was a modest probability conditional that didn't end up being transferred. 2024 has already seen Flames fans disappointed with the return for Zadorov.
And we're in an era of aggressiveness. The market could decide to pull back to early 00s to mid 10s conservatism as these trades continue to fall flat. Monahan's not sniffing that return 10 years ago.
I don't see a slam dunk here either way. He's nothing special, but he can play a premium position and the rental market is pretty shallow. It's borderline. Such a passionate debate is unusual under those circumstances.
Also, you can take solace, if your team does end up giving it up, that the player the Habs select is unlikely to be a meaningful asset in the future. Just the odds at that point of the draft.