Walksss
Registered User
- Mar 26, 2013
- 756
- 1,613
Wow people are losing their marbles in here. If Monahan gets a first these armchair experts are gonna melt down. I'll get some popcorn.
It's not up to the Habs. Monahan has to agree to resign.We should keep him in Montreal.
What do you know about physics, calculus, or quantum mechanics tough guy?he is a middle six center. Look at his stats and compare to other available centers on the market for $2M dollars (less at this point). Can I help you with other simple issues like this?
Because there's more to being a second line center than scoring PP points. He's a defensive liability and doesn't produce at 5v5 like a top 6 center.I don't understand the hypothesis that Monahan shouldn't be on a contender's second line. "if Monahan is your second-line centreman then you're not a contender.
I won't even use Vancouver as an example because Vancouver actually had pettersson and JT miller on separate lines for the majority of the season, so we can suddenly go back to that system.
I will use Boston Winnipeg and Colorado. These 3 teams are one of the best teams in the NHL. currently one of the few contenders in the league. So if they added Monahan to their team they are suddenly not contenders?
right now Monahan has more points than Colorado's next highest centermans. 27 year old Ross Colton on paper in Colorado's second-line centerman, has 23 points.
Winnipeg's second line centerman has as many points as Monahan.
Sean Monahan also has more points than Boston's second-line Winnipeg and Colorado's current second-line centerman, but those teams are contenders.
Sean Monahan would be an excellent addition (without moving any current roster pieces) to any of these teams at the moment and it wouldn't change their positions of not suddenly being contenders. For Vancouver, if we do Lotto line our way, then we can have a legit proven second-line centerman in Monahan center it. If not, we can move Monahan as a winger too. Lots of options. MY point is, Monahan will be an ok second-line centerman for many of the top 10 teams, and I used 3 examples. Well, 4 including Vancouver.
Edit
I'm gonna look at 3 more teams. Last year's Cup finalists.
Vegas knights. their second line centerman has 26 points. Monahan also has more points than him.
Florida panthers, damn, , their top 3 centermans have over 45 points.
Rangers top 2 centermans ok, they are very productive.
Flayers second-line centerman holy cow he only has 20 points.
He will be a welcomed addition for many many playoff-bound teams.
He's small though.I respect that, but NYR picks will be around 25+ and Perreault is more valuable than any prospect arounf there IMO and we dont have a ton of good RW in the system
He's the Monahan of his prime Calgary days if he had same linemates.I might be alone in here, but I'm really impressed with Monahan's play so far. He keeps adding points playing with scrubs mostly. He can easily drive a good team's 2nd line giving the opportunity. The real question is will he stays healthy for a whole year?
I think when everything is said and done, they will add another 1st pick and a prospect/roster
I don't understand the hypothesis that Monahan shouldn't be on a contender's second line. "if Monahan is your second-line centreman then you're not a contender.
I won't even use Vancouver as an example because Vancouver actually had pettersson and JT miller on separate lines for the majority of the season, so we can suddenly go back to that system.
I will use Boston Winnipeg and Colorado. These 3 teams are one of the best teams in the NHL. currently one of the few contenders in the league. So if they added Monahan to their team they are suddenly not contenders?
right now Monahan has more points than Colorado's next highest centermans. 27 year old Ross Colton on paper in Colorado's second-line centerman, has 23 points.
Winnipeg's second line centerman has as many points as Monahan.
Sean Monahan also has more points than Boston's second-line Winnipeg and Colorado's current second-line centerman, but those teams are contenders.
Sean Monahan would be an excellent addition (without moving any current roster pieces) to any of these teams at the moment and it wouldn't change their positions of not suddenly being contenders. For Vancouver, if we do Lotto line our way, then we can have a legit proven second-line centerman in Monahan center it. If not, we can move Monahan as a winger too. Lots of options. MY point is, Monahan will be an ok second-line centerman for many of the top 10 teams, and I used 3 examples. Well, 4 including Vancouver.
Edit
I'm gonna look at 3 more teams. Last year's Cup finalists.
Vegas knights. their second line centerman has 26 points. Monahan also has more points than him.
Florida panthers, damn, , their top 3 centermans have over 45 points.
Rangers top 2 centermans ok, they are very productive.
Flayers second-line centerman holy cow he only has 20 points.
He will be a welcomed addition for many many playoff-bound teams.
This is whyI don't understand the hypothesis that Monahan shouldn't be on a contender's second line. "if Monahan is your second-line centreman then you're not a contender.
I won't even use Vancouver as an example because Vancouver actually had pettersson and JT miller on separate lines for the majority of the season, so we can suddenly go back to that system.
I will use Boston Winnipeg and Colorado. These 3 teams are one of the best teams in the NHL. currently one of the few contenders in the league. So if they added Monahan to their team they are suddenly not contenders?
right now Monahan has more points than Colorado's next highest centermans. 27 year old Ross Colton on paper in Colorado's second-line centerman, has 23 points.
Winnipeg's second line centerman has as many points as Monahan.
Sean Monahan also has more points than Boston's second-line Winnipeg and Colorado's current second-line centerman, but those teams are contenders.
Sean Monahan would be an excellent addition (without moving any current roster pieces) to any of these teams at the moment and it wouldn't change their positions of not suddenly being contenders. For Vancouver, if we do Lotto line our way, then we can have a legit proven second-line centerman in Monahan center it. If not, we can move Monahan as a winger too. Lots of options. MY point is, Monahan will be an ok second-line centerman for many of the top 10 teams, and I used 3 examples. Well, 4 including Vancouver.
Edit
I'm gonna look at 3 more teams. Last year's Cup finalists.
Vegas knights. their second line centerman has 26 points. Monahan also has more points than him.
Florida panthers, damn, , their top 3 centermans have over 45 points.
Rangers top 2 centermans ok, they are very productive.
Flayers second-line centerman holy cow he only has 20 points.
He will be a welcomed addition for many many playoff-bound teams.
This is insightful and I agree with it.Some good rentals have gone for less than the (unconditional) 1st round premium in recent years. In 2019, Dzingel (~64 point pace) and Nyquist (~63 point pace) didn't get it; Zuccarello (~66 point pace) returned conditional 1sts that weren't transferred. In 2020, Lehner was a year removed from a Vezina nomination and only returned a 2nd as the base piece. Hall still had some name value in 2021. 2022 was Manson (premium style RHD), Rakell (name value) and Giordano (leadership/name value); Copp (C on pace for ~51 points) returned a modest probability conditional pick that ended up being transferred. 2023 was Domi (~67 point pace); Kane's 1st was a modest probability conditional that didn't end up being transferred. 2024 has already seen Flames fans disappointed with the return for Zadorov.
And we're in an era of aggressiveness. The market could decide to pull back to early 00s to mid 10s conservatism as these trades continue to fall flat. Monahan's not sniffing that return 10 years ago.
I don't see a slam dunk here either way. He's nothing special, but he can play a premium position and the rental market is pretty shallow. It's borderline. Such a passionate debate is unusual under those circumstances.
Also, you can take solace, if your team does end up giving it up, that the player the Habs select is unlikely to be a meaningful asset in the future. Just the odds at that point of the draft.
No kidding. This is insane.
What wild assessment of what he might cost. Even if it is a joke, putting it out there on Twitter for trade hungry hockey fans is just bad judgement.
he literally missed 3/4 of the year prior. injuries had already massively decreased his value when habs fans were claiming he was worth a 1st. weird I was also just thinking there's a lot of intellectually deficient and dishonest posters in habs threads too.........
"farcical situation" you mean like habs fans thinking they'll get a 1st for Edmundson or Monahan?
Dzingel is interesting in that The CBJ overpaid for him significantly. He was in the midst of a career year but did not have 1st round pedigree. What the Sens got may have been better than a first. They Got Duclair who would go on to have a 23G season for the Sens and a 30 goal season for the panthers. they also got 2 2nd round picks.Some good rentals have gone for less than the (unconditional) 1st round premium in recent years. In 2019, Dzingel (~64 point pace) and Nyquist (~63 point pace) didn't get it; Zuccarello (~66 point pace) returned conditional 1sts that weren't transferred. In 2020, Lehner was a year removed from a Vezina nomination and only returned a 2nd as the base piece. Hall still had some name value in 2021. 2022 was Manson (premium style RHD), Rakell (name value) and Giordano (leadership/name value); Copp (C on pace for ~51 points) returned a modest probability conditional pick that ended up being transferred. 2023 was Domi (~67 point pace); Kane's 1st was a modest probability conditional that didn't end up being transferred. 2024 has already seen Flames fans disappointed with the return for Zadorov.
And we're in an era of aggressiveness. The market could decide to pull back to early 00s to mid 10s conservatism as these trades continue to fall flat. Monahan's not sniffing that return 10 years ago.
I don't see a slam dunk here either way. He's nothing special, but he can play a premium position and the rental market is pretty shallow. It's borderline. Such a passionate debate is unusual under those circumstances.
Also, you can take solace, if your team does end up giving it up, that the player the Habs select is unlikely to be a meaningful asset in the future. Just the odds at that point of the draft.
I was being a bit facetious, but he really hasn't had a chance in Montreal to show his RD potential.As stated Monahan gets away with a lot more on a rebuilding team then he would with a contender (Jets or otherwise), playing offense with little expectations on playing good D obviously would help anyone's offensive numbers (playoffs is even far tougher then reg season). Being played on a rebuilding teams #1PP isn't something he would get on any contender team likely so again hurts his output offensively (at the very least his PP1 time would be going way down). Counter to that will be he's playing with better line mates, likely is true if he plays a top 6 role but not necessarily true if he's playing a contenders 3rd line.
Monahan is a lesser option/cheaper option compared to some better options being discussed so I'll give you that, but if a team truly wants to contend and put their best foot forward Monahan isn't the guy you go after, he's the guy you settle on when everyone else is gone or unavailable. Can't imagine any Habs fans would even disagree on that point or at least would acknowledge that's likely a fair point.
From a Jets POV, my hope would be as per the rumors is the Jets are aiming higher then Monahan and I hope they get their guy. Plus maybe add a top 4RHD
Domi is a 70 point centreWhat a silly comparison. Domi is a far less complete player than Monahan. There really isn’t much more to say.
This is your big “gotcha!” Powerful weak.Is that every Habs fan on these boards and twitter??? Did i say he deserved a 1st? I stand by my statement...you are full of it!
The problem with posters like you is you are not there to disagree with your own fan base when they’re going wild but want to defend the fan base by arguing the semantics of words like most, some and all. But keep ignoring the sentiment of the post and just attack single words thinking you are saving Habs fan base. You are not.backtracking eh?? replace "most" with "some" and you will be close to accurate. the problem with habs haters is that the generalization gene is on full throttle. It is always your kinds' downfall! Case closed.