Unfortunately I don't agree with this at all. If he was making 9.5mil and put up the performance he just did there would 100% be calls for him to be gone. He's a top line player that just played like dogshit.
People get way too bent out of shape about the contract. How about just look at the player, where he is slotted and judge him on that?
If you have a player that makes $6.5mil playing on your top line that puts up ppg in the regular season multiple seasons in a row, and then puts up 0.5 ppg for multiple playoffs in a row. Are you going to be like, oh well, he makes less money he gets a pass, no you would judge him based on what he is expected to do based on where he slots in the lineup and what he does in the regular season.
You rely on your best players no matter how much they make. The reality is, Mitch was/is a top line player. I don't care if he's making 20mil, or 1mil, a top line player that plays at PPG pace in the regular season should be better when the real games start.