thewave
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2011
- 41,980
- 12,386
He could sign a short contract like our hero Auston
AM is going to regret that move. WN looked at the geo political landscape being a Swede and locked in for the guaranteed payday.
He could sign a short contract like our hero Auston
Yes that’s all old stuff, you didn’t highlight Marners quite. Apparently there is a quote from Marner himself. I’m curious what he said.
Remember the old days when links needed to be provided to back up these statements?
"That also means I don't think there's an appetite to talk extension come July 1. The preference from the Marner camp is to start the season and see how things go," wrote LeBrun. "Perhaps there are talks on an extension eventually, but I don't believe there's a strong desire to get into them this summer."
Yes that’s all old stuff, you didn’t highlight Marners quite. Apparently there is a quote from Marner himself. I’m curious what he said.
Remember the old days when links needed to be provided to back up these statements?
If geopolitics ends up affecting Hockey salaries, 1 year versus 20 years won't make a difference.AM is going to regret that move. WN looked at the geo political landscape being a Swede and locked in for the guaranteed payday.
Yes, but if he wants that 8th year, he has no choice except to work with the Leafs because he sure ain't getting paid $12 million in the 8th year when he's 35 years old if he signs a 7 year contract elsewhere.
Marners camp anchoring first through public channels ain't a good sign. I suspect to facilitate a trade now includes communicating that Marner is not part of the long term program...or next years program.
That would be pretty bold, and Marners camp probably betting they won't go down that road. Ferris is aggressive and life is going to get complicated for Tre if he decides to battle.
Hell to the no!John Gibson @ $6,400,000 & Trevor Zegras @$ $5,750,000 = $12.15 mil or Mitch Marner raise to $12.250 mil (approx ?).
Given the current climate that seems unlikely.Alternatively it could be them trying to pressure for a quick extension (on their terms).
Though overall not quite sure how to interpret Ferris talking to the media like this
To me reading the tea leaves it seems Leafs organization would like to move on and wish Marner would cooperate and eventually provide a list of potential trade options.Given the current climate that seems unlikely.
I would speculate that it's a power move, motioning to Tre that he won't be able to use soft negotiating to navigate his way to comfortable conditions while balancing trade discussions.
He's saying, if they want to move Marner, they better go nuclear. Don't waste his time unless they have the balls to bring up Mitch next season. Ferris is confidently making the first public move - he's controlling the terms of the negotiation, doesn't think Tre will go down that road, and feels he can win that battle if they do.
He's comfortable with fighting in the mud, and doesn't believe the Leafs will risk getting dirty - so just knock it off right now.
He might be right.
That's the kind of statline I would expect from Calle Jarnkrok, not Mitch Marner.View attachment 879915
To those think Nylander, Tavares and Matthews have been as bad as Marner in the playoffs (via twitter)
That's the kind of statline I would expect from Calle Jarnkrok, not Mitch Marner.
Pretty clear he's holding Matthews and the team back in the post-season.
Until they do something in the playoffs.I think marner is getting way too much credit.
Matthews is the man. marner is Robin, Nylander is the Flash.
Over his career he's going to make close on 150M, I'm sure the 8th year is important but he's still going to be doing pretty well for himself
That’s pretty much what I had been saying from the start, I don’t think MM and his camp would think staying with the Leafs is his best option.Marner does not seem like the type to leave millions on the table. Let's say he signs a 7 year deal, what would be his next contract when he's 35? Maybe 4 million AAV to be generous?
Now, I don't think Marner is making 12 million per on his next contract, perhaps a team will pay him 11.5 million per for 7 years if he doesn't sign with the Leafs...so that's 80.5 million over 7 years...if you add the 4 million to 80.5 million, you get 84.5 million for 8 years, so his AAV over 8 years is 10.56 million...if he extends with the Leafs for 8 years at 11.5 million per and is traded, he makes about 1 million more per year for 8 years...that's not chump change.
If the Leafs don't plan on re-signing Marner, it's really in his best interest to work out an extension for 8 years this summer and agree to a trade to another team who wants him instead of playing hardball or a game of who blinks first.
AM is going to regret that move. WN looked at the geo political landscape being a Swede and locked in for the guaranteed payday.
I think he would be shooting himself in the foot if he signs a short term deal like Matthews...he would be 32 when the contract is up if he signs a 4 year deal...he'll be lucky to even get $8 million per when he's 32.
Who is his camp? There seems to be a share psychotic disorder around here. There is Marner and there is his agent. And then there are bullshit stories and speculation that builds novels. Battle? What kind of cosplay is happening around here? This is more epic than a Disney channel.'Mitch Marner prefers to stay with the Leafs and become a UFA, with his camp promoting this idea publicly."
Battle is on already.
Mitch knows he's gotta go.
I have no doubt the Leaf brass are stupid enough to do with Marner what they did with Nylander, it appears they can’t help themselves………Yeah just like we probably saw Nylander's best half season of his career.
This year he had the opportunity for redemption and to change the narrative, but he was even worse. What Ray Ferraro say, that he was disinterested?If you weren't convinced that Marner is an absolute JOKE in playoffs maybe this will convince you
THIS………We need D and G.
He's a LW
Can anyone really believe you can take these clowns at their word? I was inspired after that presser, now not so much………BINGO!
Not according to the polls around here. We know that democracy rules, right?I have no doubt the Leaf brass are stupid enough to do with Marner what they did with Nylander, it appears they can’t help themselves………
Leafs look for a team that will pay them and Marner. Having secured that, they then ask Ferris, team A is willing to pay Marner AxB, will you waive to go there? If he says no, then it could get ugly like it did for Sundin.Given the current climate that seems unlikely.
I would speculate that it's a power move, motioning to Tre that he won't be able to use soft negotiating to navigate his way to comfortable conditions while balancing trade discussions.
He's saying, if they want to move Marner, they better go nuclear. Don't waste his time unless they have the balls to bring up Mitch next season. Ferris is confidently making the first public move - he's controlling the terms of the negotiation, doesn't think Tre will go down that road, and feels he can win that battle if they do.
He's comfortable with fighting in the mud, and doesn't believe the Leafs will risk getting dirty - so just knock it off right now.
He might be right.