57 Years No Cup
New and Improved Username!
- Nov 12, 2007
- 8,818
- 8,355
Right back at ya.Self awareness minus a billion lol. This place never ceases to amaze. Later!
Right back at ya.Self awareness minus a billion lol. This place never ceases to amaze. Later!
People act like Marner is a rookie and needs some time to grow. 8 years of failure, nothing emotional about wanting him goneI'd say the "emotional" ones are the ones who are irrationally attached to a player (any player) that hasn't lived up to his contract, especially in the playoffs.
The rational ones are the ones who want to move on from non performing assets to make the TEAM better.
Arizona wouldn't be at the top of anyones list and they certainly weren't a good team. Players signing there had few other options I would think.Arizona bounced pay checks and guys still signed there.
Vegas sign guys to long term extension deals and trade them out like they're nothing.
In the end if you're a good team, you'll generally be able to attract talent.
Pure stone cold logic.People act like Marner is a rookie and needs some time to grow. 8 years of failure, nothing emotional about wanting him gone
If marner doesnt want to provide trade list and no extension talks (fully knowing we want to move on) then it better start getting ugly.
Boo him. Take away his A. 3rd line mins. No PP.
People act like Marner is a rookie and needs some time to grow. 8 years of failure, nothing emotional about wanting him gone
Yeah! That’ll teach him!!!
.
This seems like a valid point, I sure hope so anyway.Not sure about the Shanny thing. As if it is his job on the line, running it back and failing(very likely) won’t do him any good. If he makes changes, he can at least sell to his bosses, it takes a few more years….
Not sure why you'd interpret "something going on" as sign of anyone being emotional, I'd interpret it as a sign of "good, they're actually doing something instead of sitting on their collective asses".LeBrun is also reporting that there is nothing happening right now and hasn't been for weeks. Marner hasn't been asked to supply (or offered to supply) a list of teams he'd move to. Neither side is expecting to talk extension on July 1, there is no meeting scheduled between his agent and the Leafs, and Marner is content to honour his contract and go into the season without an extension.
As much as people want there to be something (gasp, he met for coffee with his new coach, he must be being shipped out!), every actual report suggests there isn't anything going on. This is good news. Not because he isn't getting traded (he might, nearly anyone might), but because we're not being overly emotional about the situation (almost like the people who run the team are adults, crazy).
Yeah I'd say what's another decade among friends except I'm not likely to have many more decades to spare at this point.6 decades already
The Kawhi chopper wanted him to stay.He is still here. I am not amused. We need to get the media chopper to follow him around like Kawhi
The guys who went to Arizona, they weren't exactly in high demand for the most part.Arizona bounced pay checks and guys still signed there.
Vegas sign guys to long term extension deals and trade them out like they're nothing.
In the end if you're a good team, you'll generally be able to attract talent.
Reverse Chopper.....kind of sounds like a signature dunk move.The Kawhi chopper wanted him to stay.
Careful.
The guys who went to Arizona, they weren't exactly in high demand for the most part.
Guys go to Vegas to win and the guys who signed long term probably got NMCs or no trades.
In either case, those teams aren't messing with a guy who used NMC. You think players and agents wont remember that?
In the end Toronto is a good team but the truth is there are other good teams and this is Canada after all? Why take the chance to get some ill will with the guy or his agent??
Just make it clear the team wont be resigning him and caress him into a small list of teams he would waive for and then do your best to make the best deal possible.
In the end it is his decision and the team gave him that power, I don't see them coming out winners if they punish him for using it.
The Kawhi chopper wanted him to stay.
Careful.
The guys who went to Arizona, they weren't exactly in high demand for the most part.
Guys go to Vegas to win and the guys who signed long term probably got NMCs or no trades.
In either case, those teams aren't messing with a guy who used NMC. You think players and agents wont remember that?
In the end Toronto is a good team but the truth is there are other good teams and this is Canada after all? Why take the chance to get some ill will with the guy or his agent??
Just make it clear the team wont be resigning him and caress him into a small list of teams he would waive for and then do your best to make the best deal possible.
In the end it is his decision and the team gave him that power, I don't see them coming out winners if they punish him for using it.
If he takes the same percentage of the cap as his original deal, that's at a minimum, $12.4M.Just offer him the Nylander deal. This team has no balls to do anything. There really isn't any other option. Shanahan wont let go of his boy band.
Or, they should be used properly - as leverage in exchange for a reduced cap hit or extra term etcFull NMC should be eliminated in the next collective bargaining agreement.
Right off the top of my head, Reilly Smith could have gone to UFA and instead signed a 3 year deal, they won a cup in year 1 of his deal and traded him to Pittsburgh after, he had a modified NTC.
Nate Schmidt also signed an extension there for less than market value and was traded within 1-2 years of the extension, also a modified NTC
Neither had an outright NMC but Vegas basically will lure you in with that competitive team and sweet taxation right and next thing you know you're freezing your ass off in Winnipeg.
Fully agree. I would get rid of NMC and no trades all together but that's not the reality right now.Just offer him the Nylander deal. This team has no balls to do anything. There really isn't any other option. Shanahan wont let go of his boy band.
Full NMC should be eliminated in the next collective bargaining agreement.
Well for one they can put him on his own line and not with 34 or 88.I’m not sure you’re fully grasping the protection a full NMC gives a player.
Marner will play out his last year of his RFA deal with Matthews, Nylander, et al., get his point-per-game-plus regular season and then wave goodbye to the Leafs, cashing in a mega-deal elsewhere.
Leafs have exactly no control here, and I guess people thought online bullying would help make him leave town but all it’s going to do is harden his resolve to stick it to the team.
I think we're well past Einstein's definition of insanity with this organization, laughingstocks of the league........I really don't fear Marner walking. It would be unfortunate but per his contract that is an option available to him. But signing him to a new 8 year deal at $12+ million. That, as Einstein would say, is the definition of insanity. I would prefer a total rebuild to that. What a waste of the next 8 years that would be. I would be jealous of Utah.
Thats when the fire Shanny bullet comes out, and then the new guy needs a yr or 2 to assess.I can’t imagine how exactly they would spin the next press conference if he stays, gets paid 12+ million and lose in the 1st round again.
I mean what could you possibly come out and say?
I don't share your concerns about this being Canada, this isn't the NBA.The guys who went to Arizona, they weren't exactly in high demand for the most part.
Guys go to Vegas to win and the guys who signed long term probably got NMCs or no trades.
In either case, those teams aren't messing with a guy who used NMC. You think players and agents wont remember that?
In the end Toronto is a good team but the truth is there are other good teams and this is Canada after all? Why take the chance to get some ill will with the guy or his agent??
Just make it clear the team wont be resigning him and caress him into a small list of teams he would waive for and then do your best to make the best deal possible.
In the end it is his decision and the team gave him that power, I don't see them coming out winners if they punish him for using it.
accountability is a foreign concept to many here..........I'd say the "emotional" ones are the ones who are irrationally attached to a player (any player) that hasn't lived up to his contract, especially in the playoffs.
The rational ones are the ones who want to move on from non performing assets to make the TEAM better.