Terrible GM
Registered User
Mariners camp is pissing me off with these stupid media leaks
Whoever running that camp is a classless prick. Especially when criticizing Matthew's contract
I know they totally leaked the Edwin Encarnacion trade..
Mariners camp is pissing me off with these stupid media leaks
Whoever running that camp is a classless prick. Especially when criticizing Matthew's contract
No trading Marner is what makes sense. Trading a whole pile of players (probably without any luck as in the case with Marleau) so you can ridiculously overpay one player makes zero sense.
Seems everything is leaking now though. Seems both sides are playing the media game. Big difference from Lou.Mariners camp is pissing me off with these stupid media leaks
Whoever running that camp is a classless prick. Especially when criticizing Matthew's contract
Another good reason why a hard CAP always fails. You can never be great. It is designed like that.The league needs to take a stand here. These guys want to be paid like there's no salary cap. Should have stayed on the picket line longer then when you had the chance. You agreed to the cap system but now everyone wants to be overpaid. You can't even trade a player who wants to be overpaid ....why would a team trade good assets to overpay one of these kids? Make an example of them now or regret it later.
Picket line?The league needs to take a stand here. These guys want to be paid like there's no salary cap. Should have stayed on the picket line longer then when you had the chance. You agreed to the cap system but now everyone wants to be overpaid. You can't even trade a player who wants to be overpaid ....why would a team trade good assets to overpay one of these kids? Make an example of them now or regret it later.
Don’t worry you will get what you want.With our cap structure, it can fit!
A] Matthews @11.634M
B] Tavares @ 11M
C] Marner @11M
D] Nylander @ 6.963M
1) 6M (Acquisition)
2) 5M (Andersen)
3) 5M (Rielly)
4) 4.5M (Kadri)
5) 4M (Muzzin)
6) 2.25 (Hyman)
7) 2.75M (Acquisition)
8) 1.6M (Acquisition)
For the top 12 players, we'd spend ~ 71.75M Leaving us with ~10M to sign the bottom 11 players.
9) 1.5M (Acquisition)
10) 1.25M (Acquisition)
11) 0.925 (Mikheyev)
12) 0.925 (Kivihalme/Korshkov/Engvall)
13) 0.863 (Dermott/Liljegren)
14) 0.842 (Bracco)
15) 0.775 (Moore)
16) 0.775 (Petan)
17) 0.750 (Rosen)
18) 0.750 (Sparks/Back-up)
19) 0.675 (Gauthier/Holl)
These 19 players + Matthews + Marner + Nylander + Tavares = ~ 81M in cap space.
Fill in the blanks as you see fit:
_______- Tavares - Marner
Hyman - Matthews - Nylander
Mikheyev/Petan - Kadri - Bracco/Moore
Mikheyev/Petan - _______ - Bracco/Moore
Gauthier
Rielly - ________
Muzzin - ________
Dermott - Rosen
Kivihalme, Holl
Andersen
_______
Have approximately 14.5 M to fill those holes.
The league needs to take a stand here. These guys want to be paid like there's no salary cap. Should have stayed on the picket line longer then when you had the chance. You agreed to the cap system but now everyone wants to be overpaid. You can't even trade a player who wants to be overpaid ....why would a team trade good assets to overpay one of these kids? Make an example of them now or regret it later.
Why do you attribute leaks to them?Mariners camp is pissing me off with these stupid media leaks
Whoever running that camp is a classless prick. Especially when criticizing Matthew's contract
There's no convincing anyone.
There's an argument for Matthews. Mitch Marner will likely get a lot more than his projection and comparables dictate as well, but William Nylander signed for less than his projection and in the same area as his comparables.
He's guilty of having a poor December and January after missing camp and the first two months. After that, his scoring and production started increasing back to normal levels.
yup , that horrible group he left behind on the Island collapsed without him
Marner pretty easily but really no reason not to have both.
Tavares plays a much harder game, he won't be the same player by the time Marner hits his peak.
Lol I guess I meant if we did decide to trade what team could entice us with assets and have the space to pay him?
ToneDog suggested the Rangers as he fits their rebuild
Why do you attribute leaks to them?
The last thing stated was after Matthews signed and they didn't leak that, they owned it.
It's not healthy to be mad about something since February, might be time to let that one go.
Whatever number he signs him for, it will have been Shanahan approved, just like Willie and AM. KD will not be fired over the Marner handling, it did not occur in a vacuum.
You expect him to be the same player for the duration of his contract?He was exactly the same player when Marner hit his peak last season.
We've overpaid for Nylander and matthews. We are where we are.
This is not going to get any better going forward.
Muzzin will want $7M next summer
Freddy will be looking at $10M+ in a couple years
Rielly will looking at $13M+ by the time he's up.
Kadri will want to get every dollar he can because he's been on a team friendly deal. Likely ends up at $7M when he's up.
Then if Kap or AJ continue to progress they will be looking at $6-7M
Dermott will be looking for $5-6M
This team will constantly be throwing guys overboard year after year. Need those 1st round picks to be home runs. At least when we have them.
You expect him to be the same player for the duration of his contract?
Why do you attribute leaks to them?
The last thing stated was after Matthews signed and they didn't leak that, they owned it.
It's not healthy to be mad about something since February, might be time to let that one go.
i guess you missed the part where the team did much better without him when the new coach installed a defense first system instead of the run and gun that inflated individual point totals but bleed goals and led the team no whereJ. Bailey, 2017-2018: 71 points
J. Bailey, 2018-2019: 56 points
A. Lee, 2017-2018: 62 points
A. Lee, 2018-2019: 51 points
Collapsed? Nope. Trend? You betcha:
M. Marner, 2017-2018: 69 points.
M. Marner, 2018-2019: 94 points.
See it, don't see it. Your choice.