Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
More than half of that is going to Faber.You’re missing one big piece in the equation, which is the roughly $15M in additional cap that the team is going to have available with almost an entirely full roster.
More than half of that is going to Faber.You’re missing one big piece in the equation, which is the roughly $15M in additional cap that the team is going to have available with almost an entirely full roster.
More than half of that is going to Faber.
Kaprizov is getting Zucc’s money.And half of what's left from that goes to Kaprizov
I already ran the numbers. This is including the $8.5M Faber is getting.More than half of that is going to Faber.
Farabee is a 14th overall pick, had the same even strength production as Boldy & is 24.One thing I would agree with is that our window really will only be 4 years if you want to start trading 13th overall picks because they won't make an impact in the next four years.
The best way (probably) to try to keep your window open beyond that is to keep those when you get them so you actually have talent coming into the system when other players start to decline.
I'm fine with extending Middleton at maybe 3-3.7M. 4.5-5 is outrageous. But I wouldn't be surprised because Guerin isn't shy about giving guys he likes player friendly deals.Kaprizov is getting Zucc’s money.
I’m worried that Middleton will be extended in the $4.5-5M range. That would piss me right off. More so than any of Foligno/Hartman/Zucc. Why even draft dmen if they never get a shot?
Middleton has every right to ask for it, based on the role he's played the last couple of years. One of the LD's in the AHL really needs to stand out this year.I'm fine with extending Middleton at maybe 3-3.7M. 4.5-5 is outrageous. But I wouldn't be surprised because Guerin isn't shy about giving guys he likes player friendly deals.
Ah, yes, with expected cap increases and other contracts coming off, it does add up.I already ran the numbers. This is including the $8.5M Faber is getting.
I know it’s a wall of text:
Minnesota Wild General Discussion - 2023-24
Cernak is a RHD. While he would be nice to have at a lower AAV, I sure don't want to give up assets(i.e. Ohgren) and then have to pay 5.2M that we don't have for him to put up 15 pts. We are fine with Spurgeon, Bogo, and Faber at RHD, for now. Can revisit after next season, when the cap penalties are gone, and taking on salary isn't such a squeeze.TB is probably willing to deal Cernak to make room to re-sign Stamkos, if BG looking for some beef on D. He's signed for 7 more years at $5.2. I'm not sure if I'd trade #13 for him but I think he'd compliment Spurgeon well.
Hunt did, last year, though it wasn't obvious till later in the year, when they had also picked up Chisholm. He, together with Goligoski, Merrill, and limited cap room, kept Hunt in the the minors.Middleton has every right to ask for it, based on the role he's played the last couple of years. One of the LD's in the AHL really needs to stand out this year.
Hunt did, last year, though it wasn't obvious till later in the year, when they had also picked up Chisholm. He, together with Goligoski, Merrill, and limited cap room, kept Hunt in the the minors.
I agree about Middleton. I think people have exaggerated ideas about how good a #4 Dman is in the NHL. Middleton provides physicality, toughness that the rest of the D corps doesn't have(I hold my breath every time Bogo gets physical, knowing his injury history), plays a decent, albeit plodding, defense, and had 25 points last year. That's a solid #4, and will be worth between 4-5M at least on the FA market in the summer of 2025, with the way the cap is going up.
Pizza party?My issues with Middleton are that he can’t be expected to jump into a 1LD role if Brodin gets hurt. He’s been carried by better defensemen partners the entirety of his NHL career & there isn't a single attribute to his game that I would consider to be above average.
If we’re prepared to pay $4-5M for Middleton, then I think it’d be much better to spend an extra $2-3M to bring in someone that is closer to the level of Brodin.
Even though he’s a #4 defenseman, he’s going to be playing the same amount of time as a #3 defenseman. In my opinion, a 2LD is significantly more important to a team than a 2LW. However, we’re in the fortunate position where we’ll have enough cap to spend to improve both. We’re not going to accomplish that though by paying average players their UFA value.
Let’s just say we sign him to a $4.5M deal, what are we going to do with the remaining ~$11M next season with this roster already filled out?
Kap - Ek - Boldy
Ohgren - Rossi - Hartman
Heidt - Yurov - Zucc
Foligno - Khus - Gaudreau
Brodin - Faber
Middleton - Spurgeon
Chisholm - Bogosian
Gus
Wall
Of course he's not a #1 LD. How many teams have backup #1 Dmen on their roster, or #1C's? Many on here wouldn't even call Brodin a #1D, just like they thought Koivu wasn't a #1C. It's a confusing way to look at a player.My issues with Middleton are that he can’t be expected to jump into a 1LD role if Brodin gets hurt. He’s been carried by better defensemen partners the entirety of his NHL career & there isn't a single attribute to his game that I would consider to be above average.
If we’re prepared to pay $4-5M for Middleton, then I think it’d be much better to spend an extra $2-3M to bring in someone that is closer to the level of Brodin.
Even though he’s a #4 defenseman, he’s going to be playing the same amount of time as a #3 defenseman. In my opinion, a 2LD is significantly more important to a team than a 2LW. However, we’re in the fortunate position where we’ll have enough cap to spend to improve both. We’re not going to accomplish that though by paying average players their UFA value.
Let’s just say we sign him to a $4.5M deal, what are we going to do with the remaining ~$11M next season with this roster already filled out?
Kap - Ek - Boldy
Ohgren - Rossi - Hartman
Heidt - Yurov - Zucc
Foligno - Khus - Gaudreau
Brodin - Faber
Middleton - Spurgeon
Chisholm - Bogosian
Gus
Wall
Yeah, the buzzsaw that is currently Chicago...The biggest issue that the Wild is going to run into is they are going to run into the buzz saw that is Chicago, Dallas, possibly Utah and Colorado/Winnipeg. Dark horses is St. Louis AND Nashville if they get their act together. Like it's nice to compete and all, but treading water with holes in the boat vs a team that has scrapped their boat and rebuilding theirs...yeah.
Speaking of Chicago, I’ve heard on several podcasts now that it’s less likely they take Demidov and the reasoning is that they don’t think Chicago wants their two top offensive forwards to be under 6’ tall. Those draft boards had Chicago taking 6’2” Levshunov at 2 and the 6’2” Chernyshov at 18.Yeah, the buzzsaw that is currently Chicago...
Levshunov also rounds out their future top 4 pretty nicely (potentially):Speaking of Chicago, I’ve heard on several podcasts now that it’s less likely they take Demidov and the reasoning is that they don’t think Chicago wants their two top offensive forwards to be under 6’ tall. Those draft boards had Chicago taking 6’2” Levshunov at 2 and the 6’2” Chernyshov at 18.
That just irritates me so much lolLevshunov also rounds out their future top 4 pretty nicely (potentially):
Korchinski - Levshunov
Vlasic - Rinzel
6'3" - 6'2"
6'6" - 6'5"
They all still have to turn into something. Not there yet.That just irritates me so much lol
We have ~$6.2M in cap space. Chisholm would bring that down to ~$5.2M and another $1M buffer would bring it down to ~$4.2MThere was reckless speculation on Locked On Wild yesterday that Guentzel might sign with the wild. Is that even possible?
There was reckless speculation on Locked On Wild yesterday that Guentzel might sign with the wild. Is that even possible?