Maple Leaf
VIP
- Sep 18, 2009
- 9,966
- 5,172
Well that appears to be the case around here. Don’t forget as much as I like Marner I wouldn’t renew him at more than 11, so yeah less than WilliamBerube likes Marner’s penalty killing, but there's no way a coach who wants his players to play north-south, avoid being cute, and be physical "loves" Mitch Marner. In fact, Berube often talks about certain players being too cute and playing east-west.
Shocker—could it be that Berube appreciates parts of Marner’s game while disliking others?
No, that couldn’t be possible. You can only love or hate a player! Nothing in between!
The picture is the picture. Hockey happen fast and the great players play it at a fast pace. I thought Marner had this great vision……….i guess notBecause it wasn't as simple as the misleading freeze frame makes it look.
Marner is absolutely a 12m player. I don't know what p/60 you're referencing because you've given no time frame or game state. It seems like you're using all-situations p/60, which is not how you use p/60 in the first place, as you're equating PP and PK time and comparatively punishing Marner for being an all-situations player. In the 2020s, Marner is tied for the 3rd best producer at 5v5, and the 12th best producer on the PP, while bringing better defense than most of the top producers, and PK impacts that many of the top producers don't. The playoff production is a situation-based team and opponent phenomenon, not an individual one. He's still a top producer on the team.Marner isn't even remotely close to a 12 million dollar player. His p/60 goes from 12th in the season to 42nd in the playoffs.
I did read what you said, but your alternative is not an actual option. We're not trading him. So it's either we re-sign him, or he walks for nothing.Maybe you should read what I said. Trading him for draft pieces is dumb, not getting a great dman in return then he stays..
He doesn't say anything about that.lets see what dubas says about that
And pictures can be misleading.The picture is the picture.
I'm comparing season to playoffs which doesn't make any sense as to why he drops so much unless he is soft little brat who gets outmuscled and turns into a mediocre player come playoff time.Marner is absolutely a 12m player. I don't know what p/60 you're referencing because you've given no time frame or game state. It seems like you're using all-situations p/60, which is not how you use p/60 in the first place, as you're equating PP and PK time and comparatively punishing Marner for being an all-situations player. In the 2020s, Marner is tied for the 3rd best producer at 5v5, and the 12th best producer on the PP, while bringing better defense than most of the top producers, and PK impacts that many of the top producers don't. The playoff production is a situation-based team and opponent phenomenon, not an individual one. He's still a top producer on the team.
I did read what you said, but your alternative is not an actual option. We're not trading him. So it's either we re-sign him, or he walks for nothing.
It's also not a question of Marner or a top defenseman. Really, it's a question of Marner or overpriced mid-tier UFAs that will likely provide less collective impact than Marner.
He doesn't say anything about that.
And pictures can be misleading.
I know you cannot trade him, so at what point is too much, 13, 14, 15.Marner is absolutely a 12m player. I don't know what p/60 you're referencing because you've given no time frame or game state. It seems like you're using all-situations p/60, which is not how you use p/60 in the first place, as you're equating PP and PK time and comparatively punishing Marner for being an all-situations player. In the 2020s, Marner is tied for the 3rd best producer at 5v5, and the 12th best producer on the PP, while bringing better defense than most of the top producers, and PK impacts that many of the top producers don't. The playoff production is a situation-based team and opponent phenomenon, not an individual one. He's still a top producer on the team.
I did read what you said, but your alternative is not an actual option. We're not trading him. So it's either we re-sign him, or he walks for nothing.
It's also not a question of Marner or a top defenseman. Really, it's a question of Marner or overpriced mid-tier UFAs that will likely provide less collective impact than Marner.
He doesn't say anything about that.
And pictures can be misleading.
To bring up an old subject when we won, Andy Bathgate was 35..result. Stanley in Toronto.NHL Free Agent Rankings: Best Available Players in 2025
Updated NHL free agent rankings for the best available players in 2025.sports.betmgm.com
20 best UFA’s available in 2025.
Unless it’s Bennett/Boeser and Chychrun who is another LHD or straight up Rantanen. I don’t see anyone in UFA that makes our team better than just keeping Marner.
As much as I like Ekblad, when’s the last time he’s played a full 82? We gonna give 9 million to him who’s close to 30 and declining?
You’re better to trade Marner for draft capital and a young player IMO.
this seems like it was solid reporting, he looks fast and is beating guys off the rush at the end of long shiftsIt was reported that this summer he worked hard
11 points, 10 A.
Over the last 3 seasons, Marner has had a 21% drop. Over the same time period, Tkachuk has had a 20% drop. Is Tkachuk a "soft little brat who gets outmuscled and turns into a mediocre player come playoff time"? Surely he will never win a cup, right?I'm comparing season to playoffs which doesn't make any sense as to why he drops so much unless he is soft little brat who gets outmuscled and turns into a mediocre player come playoff time.
You're actually hurting your own argument with this, as it makes it pretty easy to see how situation-based playoff production is, and how silly it can be to compare across teams experiencing vastly different things, with no context. In the situation Marner has been trying to produce in, those players put up 33 and 41 point paces. They moved to teams experiencing easier situations to produce, and instantly started producing more. What a coincidence! Marner's production changes align with the team's production changes, which align with the production changes of the teams and players that face the opponents and goalies that we face after us. What a bunch more coincidences!Nazem Kadri's ppg in the playoffs is .85, the "vastly superior, top 5 money in the league deserving" Marner is .87, so we're gonna pay him 5+ million extra for .02 extra in the playoffs LMFAO (minus the hits and fighting ofc) Zach Hyman outscored MITCH'S CAREER in one playoff run with 16 goals in 25 games to Mitch's 11 in 57, guess Mitch is worth an extra 7 million because his ppg is .12 better
I'm not looking to pay him 15m, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with the 12m you mentioned earlier, or even higher. We've had ~20m cap space in each of the last two offseasons. Cap space is not the magic fix-all that some treat it as. There's really no realistic alternative(s) that is worth spending it on more than Marner.I know you cannot trade him, so at what point is too much, 13, 14, 15.
If he walks we get 10 cap space and if JT leaves that jumps to 21+.
And the most (among forwards) goals allowed while on the ice, both at ES (11) and overall (13).
Lol... chances not falling again? Goalies going god mode in the season now too...this excuse is no longer just the playoff excuse for Marner?Under rated storyline, Marner 11 in 10, despite the PP stinking and Matthews blowing chance after chance he's creating. He's been great defensively as well.
Back to whatever this place has become, I can't stay long lol.
That's all on Matthews man. If it wasn't for the fact that Marner's forced to play with the best goal scorer in the world on his wing, his stats would be so much better.Lol... chances not falling again? Goaloes going god mode im the season now...this excuse is no longer just the playoff excuse?
Marner has 1 goal im 10 games. Hss on pace for 8 goals.
Marner is tied with Oliver Ekman Larsson in 5vs5 points.
Yep poor sucker, having to play with Matthews. Matthews and his inaccurate weak shot flubbing ALL Marners passes.That's all on Matthews man. If it wasn't for the fact that Marner's forced to play with the best goal scorer in the world on his wing, his stats would be so much better.
You can't make this shit up.
I think 12 would work. My cut-off would be at 12.5.Marner is absolutely a 12m player. I don't know what p/60 you're referencing because you've given no time frame or game state. It seems like you're using all-situations p/60, which is not how you use p/60 in the first place, as you're equating PP and PK time and comparatively punishing Marner for being an all-situations player. In the 2020s, Marner is tied for the 3rd best producer at 5v5, and the 12th best producer on the PP, while bringing better defense than most of the top producers, and PK impacts that many of the top producers don't. The playoff production is a situation-based team and opponent phenomenon, not an individual one. He's still a top producer on the team.
I did read what you said, but your alternative is not an actual option. We're not trading him. So it's either we re-sign him, or he walks for nothing.
It's also not a question of Marner or a top defenseman. Really, it's a question of Marner or overpriced mid-tier UFAs that will likely provide less collective impact than Marner.
He doesn't say anything about that.
And pictures can be misleading.
Lol... chances not falling again? Goalies going god mode in the season now too...this excuse is no longer just the playoff excuse for Marner?
Marner has 1 goal im 10 games. Hss on pace for 8 goals.
Marner is tied with Oliver Ekman Larsson in 5vs5 points.
Matthews struggling to score with Marner for the 3rd consecutive start to the season.
Jeez all these coincidences that just keep happening to Marner.
12 seems about right, more than Nylander less than Matthews is where he deserves to slot in.I think 12 would work. My cut-off would be at 12.5.
Look at the goal production. It's all from L2. Very glad Marner is racking those secondary assists though. Really making bank off touches and mentions. -1 still.
He has more primary assists than anyone on the team... what are you talking about?
Only 1 5v5 primary assist was an actual pass lol.He has more primary assists than anyone on the team... what are you talking about?