Maple Leaf
VIP
- Sep 18, 2009
- 9,643
- 4,924
Well that appears to be the case around here. Don’t forget as much as I like Marner I wouldn’t renew him at more than 11, so yeah less than WilliamBerube likes Marner’s penalty killing, but there's no way a coach who wants his players to play north-south, avoid being cute, and be physical "loves" Mitch Marner. In fact, Berube often talks about certain players being too cute and playing east-west.
Shocker—could it be that Berube appreciates parts of Marner’s game while disliking others?
No, that couldn’t be possible. You can only love or hate a player! Nothing in between!
The picture is the picture. Hockey happen fast and the great players play it at a fast pace. I thought Marner had this great vision……….i guess notBecause it wasn't as simple as the misleading freeze frame makes it look.
Marner is absolutely a 12m player. I don't know what p/60 you're referencing because you've given no time frame or game state. It seems like you're using all-situations p/60, which is not how you use p/60 in the first place, as you're equating PP and PK time and comparatively punishing Marner for being an all-situations player. In the 2020s, Marner is tied for the 3rd best producer at 5v5, and the 12th best producer on the PP, while bringing better defense than most of the top producers, and PK impacts that many of the top producers don't. The playoff production is a situation-based team and opponent phenomenon, not an individual one. He's still a top producer on the team.Marner isn't even remotely close to a 12 million dollar player. His p/60 goes from 12th in the season to 42nd in the playoffs.
I did read what you said, but your alternative is not an actual option. We're not trading him. So it's either we re-sign him, or he walks for nothing.Maybe you should read what I said. Trading him for draft pieces is dumb, not getting a great dman in return then he stays..
He doesn't say anything about that.lets see what dubas says about that
And pictures can be misleading.The picture is the picture.
I'm comparing season to playoffs which doesn't make any sense as to why he drops so much unless he is soft little brat who gets outmuscled and turns into a mediocre player come playoff time.Marner is absolutely a 12m player. I don't know what p/60 you're referencing because you've given no time frame or game state. It seems like you're using all-situations p/60, which is not how you use p/60 in the first place, as you're equating PP and PK time and comparatively punishing Marner for being an all-situations player. In the 2020s, Marner is tied for the 3rd best producer at 5v5, and the 12th best producer on the PP, while bringing better defense than most of the top producers, and PK impacts that many of the top producers don't. The playoff production is a situation-based team and opponent phenomenon, not an individual one. He's still a top producer on the team.
I did read what you said, but your alternative is not an actual option. We're not trading him. So it's either we re-sign him, or he walks for nothing.
It's also not a question of Marner or a top defenseman. Really, it's a question of Marner or overpriced mid-tier UFAs that will likely provide less collective impact than Marner.
He doesn't say anything about that.
And pictures can be misleading.
I know you cannot trade him, so at what point is too much, 13, 14, 15.Marner is absolutely a 12m player. I don't know what p/60 you're referencing because you've given no time frame or game state. It seems like you're using all-situations p/60, which is not how you use p/60 in the first place, as you're equating PP and PK time and comparatively punishing Marner for being an all-situations player. In the 2020s, Marner is tied for the 3rd best producer at 5v5, and the 12th best producer on the PP, while bringing better defense than most of the top producers, and PK impacts that many of the top producers don't. The playoff production is a situation-based team and opponent phenomenon, not an individual one. He's still a top producer on the team.
I did read what you said, but your alternative is not an actual option. We're not trading him. So it's either we re-sign him, or he walks for nothing.
It's also not a question of Marner or a top defenseman. Really, it's a question of Marner or overpriced mid-tier UFAs that will likely provide less collective impact than Marner.
He doesn't say anything about that.
And pictures can be misleading.
To bring up an old subject when we won, Andy Bathgate was 35..result. Stanley in Toronto.![]()
NHL Free Agent Rankings: Best Available Players in 2025
Updated NHL free agent rankings for the best available players in 2025.sports.betmgm.com
20 best UFA’s available in 2025.
Unless it’s Bennett/Boeser and Chychrun who is another LHD or straight up Rantanen. I don’t see anyone in UFA that makes our team better than just keeping Marner.
As much as I like Ekblad, when’s the last time he’s played a full 82? We gonna give 9 million to him who’s close to 30 and declining?
You’re better to trade Marner for draft capital and a young player IMO.