Value of: Marner

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I don’t see any new ideas.

I still think Vegas is the most likely.
They desperately need wingers.
They go after stars.
stone is iffy

they don’t have enough for a great package
I don’t know if edstrom is any good.

But I would say
Karlson/hague
Or
Roy/theodore

Plus a prospect

The leafs would orobably prefer karlson. Need a c. But Theodore probably won’t stay n Vegas so I would guess they would want to drop him
 
Trotz would love Marner, a guy who plays a 200 foot game and still puts up about 100 points every year, those type of players are very rare.
Trotz is a take care of the D-zone first guy and always has been. He loves his defensively responsible forwards.

No, he absolutely wouldn't.

Trotz would never tolerate a player that refuses to go to the dirty areas, pulls up short if there's a chance of contact and shies away from any and all physical play.

I would be astonished if Barry Trotz acquired Mitch Marner. I would literally rank Nashville as the least likely team in the league to acquire Mitch Marner with Philadelphia a close second.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvroArrow
No, he absolutely wouldn't.

Trotz would never tolerate a player that refuses to go to the dirty areas, pulls up short if there's a chance of contact and shies away from any and all physical play.

I would be astonished if Barry Trotz acquired Mitch Marner. I would literally rank Nashville as the least likely team in the league to acquire Mitch Marner with Philadelphia a close second.

Trotz would probably watch more than 30 seconds of one video though so there is a chance he might like how he plays
 
I don’t see any new ideas.

I still think Vegas is the most likely.
They desperately need wingers.
They go after stars.
stone is iffy

they don’t have enough for a great package
I don’t know if edstrom is any good.

But I would say
Karlson/hague
Or
Roy/theodore

Plus a prospect

The leafs would orobably prefer karlson. Need a c. But Theodore probably won’t stay n Vegas so I would guess they would want to drop him

I would want to aim a bit higher. I liked some of the Utah proposals around Marner and Keller.

Keller, Bjugstad, and a 2nd for Marner and Robertson
 
👆when one wants to be witty but ignores dates on posts
Hahaha. Or you could actually realize I was joking about it. Assuming I was ignorant about the date is such a Karen thing. Lol. Get a sense of humour. Other people actually found it funny. Which it was intended to be. If you actually read the post I didn’t say he wasn’t on LA. I said they should trade for him from WSH and then trade him to TO. Which would be pretty funny after trading him.
 
ok, just on Puckpedia trying to fit in Huberdeau, Marner, Laine, Gallagher with the rest of the Core 4... anybody have any of that LTIR lying around?
 
Kind of narrows down who ROR believes is the problem in Toronto. One or more of those guys who did get monster contracts recently.
It didn't need any narrowing down. He didn't hide why he left. he said ""For the point in my career, I think I had a lot left, and I think I wanted to be in kind of a bigger role and have more of an impact and I think Nashville was that place, and so I was able to work that out. But there's so many good things about Toronto, playing there, the team, obviously, is so good, but we just felt like this was the better fit."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Namikaze Minato
I would want to aim a bit higher. I liked some of the Utah proposals around Marner and Keller.

Keller, Bjugstad, and a 2nd for Marner and Robertson
IMO - 4 more years of Keller @ $7.2M >>>>> 1 year of Marner at $10.6M. Even if Marner is willing to extend in UTA - with his likely contract demand I'd 10x rather have Keller than Marner.

And to fully disclose - I like Marner's game. It's just that if I'm paying a winger what Marner makes - he has to be able to carry a line like Pasta/Rantanen.
 
Trotz would love Marner, a guy who plays a 200 foot game and still puts up about 100 points every year, those type of players are very rare.
Trotz is a take care of the D-zone first guy and always has been. He loves his defensively responsible forwards.
I’m starting to think this ‘ plays good defense ‘ thing is a myth. In the playoffs when I watch him he always looks horrible defensively and is constantly turning it over at the slightest threat of contact
 
I’m starting to think this ‘ plays good defense ‘ thing is a myth. In the playoffs when I watch him he always looks horrible defensively and is constantly turning it over at the slightest threat of contact
https://media.d3.nhle.com/image/private/t_ratio16_9-size40/f_png/prd/rpmfrmy9zcn53fcecuo6.png
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad