Proposal: Marner for Lindholm

raswilliam

Registered User
Feb 18, 2008
892
1,170
CA. refugee<E. TN.
I'd rather have Lindholm and I'm a Kings fan, we never compliment ducks.... There was play last year that Lindholm made Kopitar look silly on the Ducks PP. I'll try to find the clip.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Lou wouldn't hesitate trading Marner if it meant he was getting back a 22 year old number 1 defenseman. Leafs fans are being ridiculous.

Except there is the suggestion that the leafs would have to give up Marner ++.

I think the current regime is gonna be patient with the rookies, especially one that has been the leafs best player thus far
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Uhhh a leafs fan said it would take Larkin ++ to get Rielly in this thread, he was just responding to that, what exactly is he making up?

Since when does 2 games anoint a player as a generational superstar? Some of you need to look up small sample size and re-think your analysis, Marner is not more valuable than Mathews, he is not worth Mcjeesus (My god!) and he is not better than Eichel, not at this point and there is no reason to think he will be. All of those players are looked at as generational especially Mcjeesus, I have never heard anybody except for leafs fans on here say other wise, kinda telling.

Having said that I can see why Leafs fans are so excited about this player and why they don't want to trade him, especially considering your teams history of trading away blue chippers, but come on guys, Lindholm is absolutely worth more than Marner, right now. This is coming from someone who hates both teams. Neither team does this.

uhh that leaf fan (me) was responding to a Helm for Rielly joke proposal with an equally ridiculous proposal. but yeah that guy clearly took it the wrong way
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
I like how Larkin was our best forward last year (and our best after two games last season) yet would need multitle pluses for Rielly, yet Marner is worth more than an even better D in Lindholm. :shakehead

where did i say marner is worth more than lindholm?
just making it up as you go?

id put marner above larkin. and i wouldnt move rielly for larkin. so there is that
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Nothing is "case closed" because you say so with 0 evidence to back it up and it's simply your biased opinion.
:laugh:

Larkin >>> Matthews. CASE CLOSED.

yeah. the guy who has looked lost out there this year is better than a guy who set an NHL record in 39mins.

why is a wings fan derailing this thread?
 

ugghhh

Registered User
Apr 17, 2009
2,149
166
If I'm the leafs I would offer Nylander++ before offering Marner.

Marner is underrated by fans of other teams because he was drafted by the leafs and he was in a draft with McDavid and Eichel. IMO, Marner is the 4th best player from the last two drafts, and in a lot of drafts he would go #1 or #2.

I think in a few months this will be pretty obvious to everyone.

(Not a Leafs fan).
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,387
2,377
If I'm the leafs I would offer Nylander++ before offering Marner.

Marner is underrated by fans of other teams because he was drafted by the leafs and he was in a draft with McDavid and Eichel. IMO, Marner is the 4th best player from the last two drafts, and in a lot of drafts he would go #1 or #2.

I think in a few months this will be pretty obvious to everyone.

(Not a Leafs fan).

Please explain how it is underrating to say Marner isn't worth a #1Dman in Lindholm, lol I would love to hear an explanation on that.

I would take Mcjeesus, Eichel, Ekblad, Mathews, Dubois and Laine over Marner, and I really like Marner.
 

SnazzyNazzy

Registered User
Oct 20, 2012
646
0
Waterloo
Forget the last few drafts, there are few players in the last decade who see the ice the way Marner does. This guy is on another level than Strome, Nylander, Connor. Why is Toronto trading one of their big prospects for another LH top pairing defenseman when they already have one?
 

dracom

Registered User
Dec 22, 2015
13,774
9,990
Vancouver, WA
There is some crazy overrating of Marner on here. Leafs fans are acting as if Marner is better than Gretzky already.

Marner is great, but calm down guys.
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,963
21,643
Denver Colorado
There is some crazy overrating of Marner on here. Leafs fans are acting as if Marner is better than Gretzky already.

Marner is great, but calm down guys.


Maybe they are a tad angry that the Anderson trade hasn't worked out as planned so far.
 

kk87

Registered User
Feb 12, 2015
5,344
2,139
Waterloo, ON
Please explain how it is underrating to say Marner isn't worth a #1Dman in Lindholm, lol I would love to hear an explanation on that.

I would take Mcjeesus, Eichel, Ekblad, Mathews, Dubois and Laine over Marner, and I really like Marner.

Clearly you don't "really like" Marner if you think Dubois is better than him.

*And I really like Dubois*
 

CamelToews

Registered User
Dec 16, 2015
548
180
Maybe they are a tad angry that the Anderson trade hasn't worked out as planned so far.

I'd still do the Andersen trade every day of the week. We have a weak blueline and he's just coming back from injury with little preseason time.
 

Killer Orcas

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
8,260
6,475
Abbotsford BC
For those saying Leafs pass I'm sorry but your delusional. Lindholm is a number 1 D and even if Marner turns into a 80 point guy he's still not worth a young number 1 D. Ducks would never accept Marner for Lindholm.
 

KingLB

Registered User
Oct 29, 2008
9,035
1,160
Leafs fans:laugh:

As a Kings fan, you take Lindholm. Is he Doughty? NO, but will he be top 10 for quite some time? Yes, and that is more value than Marner. Only Mathews has more value than Lindholm on either team.
 

ultron*

Registered User
Sep 26, 2016
96
0
Leafs would be pretty dumb to do this. Marner is special. Lindholm is good but Marner has the potential to be an animal in the NHL. Sounds like something Burkie would do.
Potential vs proven whatever. You don't trade Mitchell Marner period. He's a perfect fit in Toronto.

And is Lindholm even signed yet? Most of the Leafs players (Rielly, Kadri) signed pretty easy and I don't know if Lou would want to bring in a situation like that.
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
Leafs would be pretty dumb to do this. Marner is special. Lindholm is good but Marner has the potential to be an animal in the NHL. Sounds like something Burkie would do.
Potential vs proven whatever. You don't trade Mitchell Marner period. He's a perfect fit in Toronto.

And is Lindholm even signed yet? Most of the Leafs players (Rielly, Kadri) signed pretty easy and I don't know if Lou would want to bring in a situation like that.

The problem isnt that he isnt willing to sign, its Anaheims cap situation.
 

TMLife*

Auston Matthews
Jun 16, 2010
3,905
1
Victoria, BC
The problem isnt that he isnt willing to sign, its Anaheims cap situation.

So why would the Leafs give up their cost controlled asset then? Seems Anaheim is in a sort of pickle... He's not the sort of Dman we need complimenting our line anyways... dont get me wrong he's great, but he's not what the leafs need.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
For those saying Leafs pass I'm sorry but your delusional. Lindholm is a number 1 D and even if Marner turns into a 80 point guy he's still not worth a young number 1 D. Ducks would never accept Marner for Lindholm.

last year there were only 4 forwards with 80+ pts. If marner becomes a top 5 scorer lindholm still is worth more? the kid is good but he isnt doughty
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
So why would the Leafs give up their cost controlled asset then? Seems Anaheim is in a sort of pickle... He's not the sort of Dman we need complimenting our line anyways... dont get me wrong he's great, but he's not what the leafs need.

You havent understood that before now? Thats what its all about. Would be resigned a long time ago if they had cap space to do it. He is a legit top pair defensemen and he is 22. He is closer to Ekblad than guys like Trouba, Rielly, Risto etc. Im not a Ducks fan but watch them alot and Lindholm is an extremely effective player!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad