Matthews is great when motivated. He started the season using his body, driving and scoring like nobody else while tenders were feeling out the equipment changes. He let it on the line, he got injured for the 3rd straight year. He came back, he was not the same, again. The first year injury was known, he did not miss time. If you adjust for the equipment changes the past two years, he has been a pt per game guy. It's good, not like McDavid though. I doubt he will be in the hunt for top 3 in pts over a full season. Great goal scorer though so full marks there.
He really got derailed by his injuries. He plays different coming back, if not a bit scared then at least least less in the dirty areas. .I wish he could have managed a full 80 games again before they threw open the bank, but KD is paying for a 100pt guy and it would have been reasonable to dial the money back a bit given the fact he finished well below a 90pt pace, took a relatively short deal but still got the NT the last season(why???), and got front loading that only a few teams in the league would have offered. Does Dubas lie awake at night shivering in fear of offer sheets because that is not really an RFA contract?
I don't know the Dubster will be able to reign in team Marner as he hasn't shown that ability yet, but he can't keep losing on these deals because $500k here and a$1M there long term adds up. Maybe Shanny needs to lend him some sack for the Marner negotiation but who here thinks both Nylander and Matthews weren't Shanahan approved deals? Maybe Dubas isn't the the one with the soft spine at all. The correct message, if so, was for Shanny to let Willie sit for the season. I hope he thinks about that a lot.
When Gord Miller says "random anonymous GMs say they would pay $11M for Marner", I believe there is truth to that. Twenty teams in the league don't really have a real impact forward so they might well pay that because they have no other expensive stars so you do what must be done to fill the spot since you have both the need and the cap space. Tampa, Pittsburgh, and Colorado would not be clubs that said $11M of course and I haven't seen anywhere that these invisible executives would pay $11M plus the 4 firsts, nor that their clubs would actually have the money to do that.. It's possible that some have-not clubs would pay the tab, but it means the player going to a weaker team, maybe no playoffs, and being with a center who is a peg or two below JT, plus have the savior role dropped on them because of the cost. Just because someone, somewhere, would drop their pants on a deal doesn't make that market value, or a good place to go.
I think its important that Marner sees what is out there, the clubs that are interested in him, and makes an educated decision based on that information rather than what his parents are telling him. Equally important is the Leafs courtship of Panarin, because if they can be signed for remotely similar money I will take Panarin and the picks every time. Of course if the bread man is out, you have Duchene and thats about it, so it isn't like "we lose Mitch but look at his replacement." There is obviously huge value to the cap savings and no Marner does mean room for Karlsson for instance. I am not advocating any path here except you don't pay $11M for a 26 goal forward and a healthy EK is easily fair value so it isn't either over-pay Mitch and succeed or lose him and fail. A few different potential positive outcomes are out there. Here is where Kyle Dubas earns his paycheque.