- Dec 12, 2017
- 24,469
- 11,230
That's irrelevant to my question.
Sorry, but that appears to be his reasons.
That's irrelevant to my question.
Anyone remember that time Marner pulled through in game 7 to get us into rd2? How the other kids did the same?
Obviously a big old Nope, but clearly they are all worth the highest paid contracts age vs performance. No PO accomplishments or anything. What a joke.
Those numbers are what i am and was thinking.Dubas clearly goofed up. He has made many mistakes. A huge one if We do not resign Tyson. Giving up Kadri for one year of Tyson is a very steep price. Same as giving up a first to get rid of Marleau.
Marner could have been signed last summer for 8 years for less money that he is going to get for 5 or six years. Dubas was offering what Nylander is signed for and Marner countered with 9m per. A 8.5 per x 8 years is what I suggested last summer.
Every time team accomplishments (or lack thereof) are brought up when discussing contracts for individual players, I just roll my eyes. Can you figure out why that is?
We know what the upper limit of his contract is (Matthews). We know they dont have the cap to pay him those dollars so he will be paid less for less term. The notion of blowing the cap is hyperbole. They know the number so the question is term.So...just want to be clear here...are you advocating blowing the cap out to give Marner "whatever he wants"...just want to know how seriously to take your comments lol
It is highly unlikely. 9 x 8 as a lowball would assume an ask of something like 11 x 8 last summer. These kinds of numbers are silly.I’m sure at some point they talked numbers? Sure. But what you think or I think a lowball according to Ferris is in no way a sure thing.
It would not surprise me for a second if they thought 9 x 8 was a lowball.
I’m not surprised if they think 11.5 x5 is a lowball.
this is exactly it! strange posters turning on Marner because he is asking to much, but apparently they think the Matthews and Nylander's contract are good deals I dont get it!Is there a fan amongst us that didn’t think Marner would get over paid? Seriously...after the Nylander roll over and the Matthews gift, it was always going to be an overpay. So why get pissed at the next horse at the Dubie dollar trough? Don’t get it.
What I don't get is why people want Marner to be vastly overpaid and hinder their cup chances?this is exactly it! strange posters turning on Marner because he is asking to much, but apparently they think the Matthews and Nylander's contract are good deals I dont get it!
he is worth what he is worth, funny he is the highest point producer for the leafs last year but trying to get him to take less than his worth is stupid. Dubas started this with paying willy 7 mill than imo over paying Matthews on a 5 year deal I dont think its the posters that are hindering there cup chances lol.What I don't get is why people want Marner to be vastly overpaid and hinder their cup chances?
I don't get that!!
Every time team accomplishments (or lack thereof) are brought up when discussing contracts for individual players, I just roll my eyes. Can you figure out why that is?
he is worth what he is worth, funny he is the highest point producer for the leafs last year but trying to get him to take less than his worth is stupid.
It is highly unlikely. 9 x 8 as a lowball would assume an ask of something like 11 x 8 last summer. These kinds of numbers are silly.
this is exactly it! strange posters turning on Marner because he is asking to much, but apparently they think the Matthews and Nylander's contract are good deals I dont get it!
What I don't get is why people want Marner to be vastly overpaid and hinder their cup chances?
I don't get that!!
You can thank Tavares for some of that. On his own without a finisher, he gets nowhere near 94 points. Don't pay him based on being propped up by an elite C. Plus he's a 22 goals, 87 point player if you take away the empty net scoring.he is worth what he is worth, funny he is the highest point producer for the leafs last year but trying to get him to take less than his worth is stupid.
yes there is its too bad we got so many forwards making so much money but I would much rather have Marner on my team than Nylander but that's just my opinion. we cannot have it all I suppose. I just dont understand trying to squeeze Mitch when he was our highest point producer.Funny thing there is a thing called a "cap" and after those guys signed, there is not that much left.
did he not get 94 points? get off it. lol so now empty net points dont count really? another horrible take.You can thank Tavares for some of that. On his own without a finisher, he gets nowhere near 94 points. Don't pay him based on being propped up by an elite C. Plus he's a 22 goals, 87 point player if you take away the empty net scoring.
yes there is its too bad we got so many forwards making so much money but I would much rather have Marner on my team than Nylander but that's just my opinion. we cannot have it all I suppose. I just dont understand trying to squeeze Mitch when he was our highest point producer.
that is his decision its why he gets paid to be the gm of the leafs, but I doubt they are losing Marner would be an epic fail for the leafs.Dubas is not prepared to throw Willy overboard. Marner has to sign closer to the Leafs number if he wants to be a Leaf.
He got 94 points playing predominantly with Tavares. So let's pump the brakes on Marner's production and give credit to someone who has inflated the stats of his linemates since he entered the NHL. Switch Marner and Matthews' linemates, and see who does better.did he not get 94 points? get off it. lol so now empty net points dont count really? another horrible take.
Nylander and Marner are not comparable in any way. Why post this nonsense.Nylander scored at the same rate, only ended up a +1 in the playoffs rather then a -4.
Of course, one had weaker linemates and probably weaker Quality of Opposition as well.
But they were on the same team, so why should Marner be handed a contract based on playing
pond hockey during the regular season alone. Marner looked entertaining, I know that counts
for something. Look at Kapanen speeding along with his two career assists being put on
the first line last season. It's not always about the numbers.
My 1st visit to Toronto was with a buddy of mine back in the summer of '91...We stayed at the Neill-Wycik 'hotel' for a handful of nights
Was walking around the nearby area during the day, and stumbled across this place known as Maple Leaf Gardens...Doors were wide open as it was a warm sunny day so we ventured in...The guys who were watching the front door/s didn't have a problem when asked if we could walk around a bit since we were fans, and were visiting from the States...It was great - we wandered around the Gold seats for a bit, the concourse, and then chatted up with an 'old salt' custodian/maintenance guy who had been an employee of MLSE for 30 plus years...It's sumthin I'll never forget.
Just who had more points. JT or Marner. Marner right so who inflated who’s stats. JT had more goals then assists for the first time ever as he had a superior talent then himself playing with him.He got 94 points playing predominantly with Tavares. So let's pump the brakes on Marner's production and give credit to someone who has inflated the stats of his linemates since he entered the NHL. Switch Marner and Matthews' linemates, and see who does better.
Just who had more points. JT or Marner. Marner right so who inflated who’s stats. JT had more goals then assists for the first time ever as he had a superior talent then himself playing with him.
What I don't get is why people want Marner to be vastly overpaid and hinder their cup chances?
I don't get that!!