OK I had a closer look and is looks like this is misleading. Maybe these number include PK situations which obviously make Marner look worse? Not sure what you're looking at but when I look at 5on5 numbers, these .
OK I had a closer look and is looks like this is misleading. Maybe these number include PK situations which obviously make Marner look worse? Not sure what you're looking at but when I look at 5on5 numbers, these numbers are pretty similar for all these guys.
I know you're not a Marner fan (understatement) and you love to post numbers, but when you do stuff like this you lose credibility.
View attachment 707186
"I know your not a Marner fan".... I'm no longer a "troll" though? Considering I was obviously correct in my concern with Marners play in the season and previous playoffs translating to playoff success. I believe you and a few select others repeatedly told me I didn't know what I was talking about and I was a troll?
...not a Marner fan. No... As I said repeatedly in the season (and was constantly attacked for it) , I don't think his skillset and style of play translates to playoff success. It has nothing to do with being a player fan, I has everything to do with being a fan of winning. I don't see a Stanley cup roster when paying him 11 million or 13% of the cap to be more precise