mriswith
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2011
- 4,741
- 8,772
Colorado became a contender off of cap advantaged contracts to those players, not just based on having the players. It gets much, much harder for them next year after already having gotten harder this year, despite having the same core.They didn't trade their best players for draft picks. Hughes is not an easy piece to find even when you are drafting high every year. That's a huge piece on d like Makar. Pettersson is a 100 plus point (soon to be) Selke type player at 24 years old. That's another huge piece similar to Mackinnon. And now we have an opportunity to add another Pettersson/Hughes level player.
Maybe there is an example, but has there ever been a team with 2 young franchise level players that decided to go full rebuild instead of building around those players?
It's not just the players, it's the whole picture. It's the contracts to those players, it's the supporting group and their contracts and the farm to support a window too.
Full rebuild is trading everyone. Most of us wanted to build around Pettersson and Hughes, but do it properly over a couple years building up towards it. What we're doing is pretending that we're the NYR or Boston when we're side by side with Arizona in the standings.