credulous
Registered User
- Nov 18, 2021
- 4,318
- 5,823
maybe we need a good vibes only version of this thread for people who don't want to read any criticism of the management group
I mean you were making snide comments last year about how people being critical of management 7 years in would feel physical pain if they praised Benning so it is totally understandable why people are confused that you were, in actuality, critical of him.Oh gawd I never loved Benning...........I preached patience for the first several years........just like I am here. Eventually I clued in that Jimbo needed to wear velcro shoes and adjusted my attitude as such. Probably a good season too late but yeah it became pretty clear to me that Dim Jim was fully unqualified for the job. If it makes you feel better to think otherwise feel free........I'm have about as much interest in correcting u as I do in knowing the price of tea in China right now.
People on this board expecting current management go from a fat overweight and broke 30 year old into a stacked wealthy in shape stud overnight..........that's not gonna happen as the sins of Jimbo are not gonna be erased overnight.
For the most part I think management has done a decent job - other than re-signing Boeser (which would have been an incredibly tough decision but the right one to let him walk) and not saving that cap for a d man they've been fine.
Yes you can see from 4 solar systems away we need a massive upgrade on our D - sooner or later that will happen. .............Until then I'm gonna do the same thing as I've done - preach patience. Rome wasn't built in a day and neither will this hockey club.
So we should have done what? Our team - despite your assertations - was never in a position to rebuild. We have too many high quality assets to do so.
If we don't fix the d at some point then yeah this management has failed.........until then I'm in wait and see mode and not rush to indict mode........
We just have different views on the phrase making a claim then“If people want to bask in doom and gloom…” in a response to my post is imo making that claim.
Also referencing those critical as throwing themselves off bridges Is pretty gloomy.
Not sure about the rest of this, I don’t know specifically what youre taking about.
Well im not making any sounds so there’s that…Potato - potatoe
Feel free to dig up where i was optimistic when Beagle signed? That was an assinine signing from minute one. Benning never was able to walk away from something he had his sites on - that 4th year was completely unnecessary and we had ZERO need for a 4th line player to be paid that much. Funny u mention as the Beagle signing is probably one of the things I'm most pissed about from Bennings tenure (but hey let's not let the facts get in the way of a good story now right).
And just fyi you don't sound glad........most bitterish but I get things get misinterpreted by text........
Yeah rough crowd around here..........
Lolmaybe we need a good vibes only version of this thread for people who don't want to read any criticism of the management group
It really isn’t. Looks a lot like early Lindenning. Main difference is Benning inherited a better defence corps…and a better cap situation.Lol
Criticism for signing the mikheyev contract before trading garland is fine
The bs about new mgmt group same junk along those lines is rediculous
I guess..It really isn’t. Looks a lot like early Lindenning. Main difference is Benning inherited a better defence corps…and a better cap situation.
You think that, even with Miller's new contract, this MIGHT be a stealth tank year? Since they didn't/couldn't shore up our blueline?
One can only hope huh...
Most realistic point of view in my opinionI can honestly see them being prepared with both outcomes; waiting to see if deep forwards and strong goaltending combined with outperformance from defence can make us competitive and build from there, hoping to fix the defence when opportunities come up, but if things fall apart then sell off assets at the deadline.
I wouldn't be surprised if they were true to their word that they expected this to take 2-3 years, but they're looking for opportunities to accelerate it if the right opportunity comes up.
Chris Gear was seen as a/the smart one because Jim Benning is Jim Benning, John Weisbrod was a phantom, and he was a long term hold over in the organization. But man, the more he talks, the more he probably hurts his chances of getting another job in the league. Or not because a lot of people in hockey management think that way.
It really isn’t. Looks a lot like early Lindenning. Main difference is Benning inherited a better defence corps…and a better cap situation.
Definitely. Patience is needed, but not a blank cheque of faith. The reasonable ground is somewhere in the middle.Most realistic point of view in my opinion
2 year expectation however that doesnt absolve them from the detective work it takes to find potential moves to accelerate it
I wonder if given the choice what most people would choose to undo:
Hiring of Jim Benning.
Or
Aquilini buying the team over Galardi/Beedie (with or without Aquilini.)
Short of that, the reality is that it might take time for the market to have the flexibility to see what our management team can do, at that point we can evaluate what their strategy and execution looks like.
If they start making obviously stupid moves with a short-term mentality THEN they've forfeited any trust.
Poor asset management, bad value calls, etc.
But this might take into next season where there's enough movement and opportunities for us to get a sample size to see how good Rutherford and Alvin are.
Sounds to me like Drance is talking out of his posterior..Walking,talking clickbait.. mechanism designed to get impatient fans frothing at the mouth.Stupid moves can also include effectively extending this flawed roster on term at market rates thereby capping your ability to make moves due to salary (say fixing the blue line for example), while also continuing to not address the abysmal farm system (and by extension your calibre of ELCs).
This regime is starting to have a “deer in the headlights” smell that’s concerning. If they refuse to make aggressive moves out of fear of being worse, you’re just delaying the inevitable.
Drance is not wrong when he says he potentially sees the most this roster being able to accomplish is a few playoff appearances before the rebuild, though. The system is really broken from Benning.
I can honestly see them being prepared with both outcomes; waiting to see if deep forwards and strong goaltending combined with outperformance from defence can make us competitive and build from there, hoping to fix the defence when opportunities come up, but if things fall apart then sell off assets at the deadline.
I wouldn't be surprised if they were true to their word that they expected this to take 2-3 years, but they're looking for opportunities to accelerate it if the right opportunity comes up.