To be honest, aside from winning a cup and walking away on his own terms, having an arena full of people chanting my name before my retirement isn't a terrbile way to go out.
Rutherford had no idea what he was walking into.
Oh I am not so sure Rutherford didn't, this could be "Managing up".
Also, Myers next year is no where near worth Guenther. I would think Myers next year after the bonus is paid, may be worth a 3rd to 4th round pick, and likely only to Ottawa as they’re a budget team wanting to compete for the playoffs. At the deadline next year he may be worth similar value to a contender.
You never know, it isn't the amount of money spent it is the cap hit. I am not sure Ottawa has the cap space but Arizona need cap hits that are bigger than money spent. Myers is a +5 million cap hit.
He is also the highly valued RHD and the way he has maintain his composure in the room as a leader has value.
Arizona can offer up a 1rst easily, you really have to look the players from a different point of view.
Other RHD have gotten much more than just a first round pick, hell the media are saying Schenn could be worth a 1rt or 2nd round pick
Yeah but Boston won’t take him because he sucks. Buying him out might probably be best, at least you don’t have him on the roster sinking one paring down.
But it eats up a contract spot, adds to the cap for 8 years, does not bring back anything in return and who is there to replace him? And I posted before he was never a defensive dman any more than Hughes is, he was and is an offensive dman.
It’s low effort stupid replies that lowers the quality of the board.
I am not in the business of saying JR is great, if they hire Tocchet then I’ll be piss and critize them heavily for it.
Like I said, what has Jr said that is humiliating. BB has done a bad job in several different ways and pointing that out is humiliating? There are ways to talk about things without it being personal and nothing he has said has been personal. Yet you guys all gobble that shit up and think oh yeah yeah that was really personal.
Still there is some reason that this wasn't put to bed a long time ago without all the drama.
Management vetted and hired Yeo, a NHL head coach as an assistant, if Bruce was such a problem for management all they had to do is what they are going to do soon, fire him without the months long ridiculing.
If they do hire The Bookie he will not have a good time here.
Honestly if you have an issue with my opinion I am open to debate on it. The fact that you seem to bucket me into well he must be a JR shill because he has a different opinion shows how shallow your thinking is. Yes people don’t just below to two extremes, it’s shocking to you but if you are capable of some original thought then that possibility might not be so shocking for you.
You ought to see the extremes CDC goes to in order to keep the kombya going.
If the Canucks bought out OEL this summer what would be the amount that would count against our cap?
19 million over 8 years, whereas a 50% retain is 15 mil over 4 years and the retention spot remains open and there would be some sort of a return.
"Former Vancouver Canuck, former scapegoat".
It will never not piss me off that Aquilini basically brought in Linden to be a meat shield to criticism and once he thought for himself, he was thrown away like a children's play toy. We are literally being run by Sid from Toy Story.
It was obvious why Linden was brought on board, to soothe the mob but I do think that they had the idea that Quinn would be the mentor like Bowman was in Chicago. That would have changed things.
But don't give Linden an award, if he had put TEAM first a rebuild may have started earlier and vets may have been traded. Benning gets a lot of flack for that, letting vets go for nothing but Linden has some responsibility there too.
He hated it when he was traded and I think that colored his decision making to be more player than team.
Blaming Boudreau for the team's play suggests that management thinks this team has underachieved even when they have been playing without what management considered to be a franchise goalie. To me, that's actually the interesting discussion here. I don't think the most optimistic fan boys here (myself included) think the team would have no trouble making the playoffs without Demko playing like the elite goaltender we have seen him be, nevermind having Spencer Martin as the team's #1 goalie. The Canucks have lost a lot of 1 goal games this season (games that we probably would have won had we had Demko playing like a top 15 goaltender).
How the team is playing is the result of roster construction and demands on player to ply outside of their comfort zone. The players cannot be blamed for taking the money offered.
That the team would win IF Demko played like a Vezina candidate? I'll let that one slip because to me it is like a coach saying "If we scored an those two goals we would have won" or "If we stop that shot we win". Food for fodder.
It isn't JUST the easy season the team has to be good in. BTW I am in the camp of the last 6 years kind of shows what the team has and that getting older without enough young players doesn't make a team better if it has a losing culture. So no, I didn't think the team progressed as far or fast as others in the division let alone the league.
I think I just read that Pettersson refused to answer some questions in the post game. I can't find that