arttk
Registered User
Ok ummm so yeah I share your pain.2014 to now 2023.
That is considered two hockey generations.
What is there that is good about what has been happening?
How many years can Horvat, Boeser, Pettersson, Demko and Hughes be considered the great youth on the team? How many years cheering for their exploits? And team depth?
When actions elicit a certain reaction that reaction can become a habit.
Sometimes watching can lead to learning. So for the time between 2014 and 2023 what has been taught by the Canucks? Smart people will eventually start to look at why?
Why have other teams been worse but are now far better?
Why have Stanley cup winners won? What did they do?
Why don't the Canucks have cap space?
Even if some of the answers are easily found then why did they do them if they were that easy to find?
I am probably considered a conspiracy nut because I don't things "just happen" all the time. To me there has to be a reason why Bruce was not let go if that is what they wanted to do a long time ago.
So I looked at the schedule, it is perfect for a new guy coming in. Two below .500 teams right off the bat if Bruce is canned after tonight's game. A road trip starting after a break in the schedule. Then playing teams that will be deciding on tanking for a better draft position with other teams secured in their playoff spots so not as invested in winning as keeping healthy. The new guy gets the 3rd easiest schedule in the league.
There is a good chance there will be a bump again, just like last year. And some years in the past when Arizona, Buffalo and Vancouver had the best records in the league for a couple of weeks near the end of the season but all still ended up at the bottom.
If there is a bump with a new coach what do you think they do? At the TDL? At the draft? Will they want the new guy to have time to see if he can change the spots on the leopard?
IMO what happens between now and the TDL will signal if any change will happen at all other than a coach.
Here is one single "What if", what if Schenn decides to go?
You know the Canucks have never done a rebuild or won a cup either.
You wrote a lot so I guess I’ll just reply in general. I think Benning is an uniquely bad GM. I think 99% of the things he has done is whack and shit is so f***ed up that it will take time to resolve. Also he is so horrible that I think most of the fan base is suffering from post Benning syndrome thinking any similar philosophy will lead to the worse possible result. Like finding young players is a fine strategy if they can get like Dach right? But Benning is so adept at finding Vey, Pedan, Pouliot, Granlind and etc for really high prices that this fan base somehow assumes that’s what JR and crew will do because JR like Benning don’t believe in a complete tear down rebuild. People seemed to forget that this league is not about strategy but about execution. There are like 3 or 4 strategies period in building a hockey team. You rebuild, build, go all in and retool and you jump between these states. The thing that separate the teams aren’t what state they are at but how well they execute. Saying that oh JR is like Benning but with better pro scouting is like completely missing the point. A Benning with better pro scouting is not Benning, the fact that makes Benning bad is that he is the shit Midas and nearly every pro scouting decision leads to the shittiest outcome.
So I am trying to let you all know that, plan doesn’t f***ing matter, execution does. Like if you don’t trust them to build then you shouldn’t trust them to rebuild because if you have a bunch of guys that can’t execute, it will just lead to a decade of rebuilding. So what matters is how good are they able to evaluate talent, their contract work, trade history and etc.
I think management wants to replace almost everyone but Petey, Hughes and Demko. Like Miller was on the block too and the return was meh so they decided to keep him. I don’t really think they are double downing on what people think are the core. I just think they want to move as many pieces out as possible and for some pieces, if the return is not there, they will either keep him at market value(Miller) or they will keep in order to rehabilitate value (garland and Boeser). So this so called re-tool is really like a small rebuild. Now if that doesn’t happen by this off-season, you will see me popping off as well but I can understand how there are a bunch of players that are just impossible to move.
I don’t agree with the Tocchet move so I don’t know what to say. I hope we don’t get a new coach bump, i really really hope we don’t get a new coach bump.
I think Bo, Schenn and one more player will be gone at TDL. It’s going to happen so I am really curious what type of asset they are going to get.