Macch
Registered User
- Mar 22, 2010
- 6,577
- 1,960
Don't forget the best General of them all: Tony DeHart.![]()
Wow that's messed up
Don't forget the best General of them all: Tony DeHart.![]()
Other than Reinhart, nobody in this draft fits NYI draft profile better than Dal Colle according to current information.
Not gunna lie. I kinda see the Burke assessment of 'compete' issue with him.
He looked fantastic when everything was going right, but the game I went to against the Battalion; really disappeared when needed.
Not that I wouldn't take him. However, just something to note.
I still like the prospect - but some guys I had farther away from him in the depth prospect chart, have inched a bit closer in my books.
I always thought MDC looked like Malkin when I've watched him play. Not because they both wear 71, but because they both have that tall guy with a short stick look and both can be pretty shifty despite their size.
Not gunna lie. I kinda see the Burke assessment of 'compete' issue with him.
He looked fantastic when everything was going right, but the game I went to against the Battalion; really disappeared when needed.
Not that I wouldn't take him. However, just something to note.
I still like the prospect - but some guys I had farther away from him in the depth prospect chart, have inched a bit closer in my books.
He also possess a hard, accurate shot that whips past goaltenders with regularity. Unlike some of his offensively-gifted peers, Dal Colle pays attention to his defensive responsibilities and sticks to defensive assignments admirably. The only real area of weakness for Dal Colle is the explosiveness in his first few steps. He is a good skater but still needs to add that elite acceleration that can overwhelm defenders.
To anyone that has watched him most of the season, does he have that clutch play in him when the game is on the line? I know he has the skill, but to be compared to Kane means that you have to have it when it matters. I havent been reading that about him, I could be wrong.
Why isn't he regarded as being on the same level of Reinhart, Bennett, Ekblad, and Draisaitl?
Why isn't he regarded as being on the same level of Reinhart, Bennett, Ekblad, and Draisaitl?
Not a centre, relied fairly heavily on the PP to produce, played with an older first round pick in Laughton. Reinhart, Bennett, and Draisaitl all essentially carried their teams (and certainly their lines) whereas it's more difficult to say the same for Dal Colle. They also scored a lot of ES points, which is more impressive than being heavily reliant on the PP (particularly in junior) for scoring.
As far as Ekblad, I don't know. Ekblad has the big frame and heavy shot that scouts love, and he allegedly thinks the game at a high level.
Well he was on the best team out of all those prospects. He was also the Gen's best player in the playoffs.
He didn't really rely on the PP. He can score at any time of the game in any situation. Not sure why he gets knocked because he has shown to be lethal on the PP.
"Rely on the PP" in the sense that a greater proportion of his points were acquired on the PP (I believe it's 40-50% for Dal Colle if memory serves, vs. ~30-40% for others).
Being lethal on the PP is fine, but when a disproportionate amount of your points come from the PP it implies a lesser ability to score at ES. And if you can't dominate at ES in junior, it's generally a sign of weakness as an NHL prospect.
Now I'm not saying that Dal Colle is a bad prospect, because he's not. I'm simply saying that the fact that a smaller proportion of his points came at ES (in addition to the fact that he scored less points than those guys, period) indicates that he's less dominant as a prospect, and thus may be less good as a full-fledged adult hockey player.
This is obviously not a perfect correlation; sometimes a player with greater PP point proportion is better than another guy with a greater ES point proportion if their overall point totals are similar, sometimes a guy comes out of nowhere and breaks out post-draft, etc. However, as a general rule of thumb, ES/PP point split for prospects is a fairly reliable indicator (in addition to the other indicators) of which prospects are more likely to be successful.
To anyone that has watched him most of the season, does he have that clutch play in him when the game is on the line? I know he has the skill, but to be compared to Kane means that you have to have it when it matters. I havent been reading that about him, I could be wrong.
"Rely on the PP" in the sense that a greater proportion of his points were acquired on the PP (I believe it's 40-50% for Dal Colle if memory serves, vs. ~30-40% for others).
Being lethal on the PP is fine, but when a disproportionate amount of your points come from the PP it implies a lesser ability to score at ES. And if you can't dominate at ES in junior, it's generally a sign of weakness as an NHL prospect.
Now I'm not saying that Dal Colle is a bad prospect, because he's not. I'm simply saying that the fact that a smaller proportion of his points came at ES (in addition to the fact that he scored less points than those guys, period) indicates that he's less dominant as a prospect, and thus may be less good as a full-fledged adult hockey player.
This is obviously not a perfect correlation; sometimes a player with greater PP point proportion is better than another guy with a greater ES point proportion if their overall point totals are similar, sometimes a guy comes out of nowhere and breaks out post-draft, etc. However, as a general rule of thumb, ES/PP point split for prospects is a fairly reliable indicator (in addition to the other indicators) of which prospects are more likely to be successful.
I truly dont think its a great indicator for judging Dal Colle as a prospect, anytime he has the puck in the offensive zone he is a dangerous as they come, especially for his draft class. Just because he has more points on the pp than most others generally means he has had more pp time, and the Generals being a good team also were on the pp more than most. You are drafting him for his size, elusive skating, great hands and deadly shot. Forgot about his point totals or how he got them, its the package being put together completely that you are drafting and hoping for.
How does Dal Colle compare stylistically to Tavares when he was in Oshawa? Seems like there is a lot of skillset similarities between the two. I hope the Isles get MDC, it would complete the trifecta with JT and de Haan. Maybe we select Hunter Smith later on to make it a 4-some.![]()