sanitysrequiem
Registered User
- Nov 14, 2009
- 1,426
- 115
reminds me so much of james neal
He's an absolute clone of James Neal. Every movement he makes out there reminds me of that guy.
reminds me so much of james neal
This is really true.
The guy is constantly in the wrong place but gets the puck and puts it in the net. It's almost like he's not worried about giving up chances against and as a result he finds space to score...I think in the NHL that strategy would cost him in terms of odd man rushes and chances against which other players will be able to capitalize on.
His game is the exact opposite of someone like Bo Hovat's.
What chances has he given up at all in the WJC? People keep talking like hes completely killing the team with his defense but I cant think of one play hes made that led to any issues. People hear it before the tourney and as soon as they notice it during a game they say oh ya there it is. Hes done nothing to say hes played worse defensively than Petan, McDavid, Drouin or even Hudon.
Name one goal where he was out of position that could have hurt the team? None of his goals against Germany, not his goal where hes infront of the opposition net and not during any of his assists.
i really wish Columbus would have taken this kid over Dano ... but i trust Jarmo's judgement ...
i really wish Columbus would have taken this kid over Dano ... but i trust Jarmo's judgement ...
What chances has he given up at all in the WJC? People keep talking like hes completely killing the team with his defense but I cant think of one play hes made that led to any issues. People hear it before the tourney and as soon as they notice it during a game they say oh ya there it is. Hes done nothing to say hes played worse defensively than Petan, McDavid, Drouin or even Hudon.
Name one goal where he was out of position that could have hurt the team? None of his goals against Germany, not his goal where hes infront of the opposition net and not during any of his assists.
Give us Wennberg and you can have him
I'm not too sure I would trade Mantha for Wennberg right now...too much hidden potential with Mantha.
I'm not too sure I would trade Mantha for Wennberg right now...too much hidden potential with Mantha.
I think what he's saying is that the sky's the limit with Mantha. Wennberg is much more a sure thing, but perhaps doesn't have that legit top line player upside.Hidden potential?
I'm fine with that, really. Usually when you draft at #20 you end up with players with pro qualities and you pray they find the talent. Mantha has the talent in spades, but he has to find the pro qualities. It's still a gamble, but I'd take that second gamble over the first any day.If you don't think this guy needs a lot of work to his committment defensively to play in the NHL regularly you are kidding yourself. We will see if he has it in him. Nobody's asking him to be Patrice Bergeron out there but he should be watching tape of Jeff Carter to see a big guy who doesn't play a prototypically "physical" game and see how he can affect a game for 200 feet.
I think what he's saying is that the sky's the limit with Mantha. Wennberg is much more a sure thing, but perhaps doesn't have that legit top line player upside.
I'm not too sure I would trade Mantha for Wennberg right now...too much hidden potential with Mantha.
“He’s been really receptive,” two-time gold-medal-winning Canadian head coach Brent Sutter told Yahoo.com after Canada’s win against Germay. “He’s really been a sponge to it and wants to learn that part of it and we’re going to continue to work with him on it.”
Mantha himself told Yahoo he’s doing everything he can to shake the knock that he’s not a complete player: “I think I’m taking that off my name.”
How many players in the NHL would you classify as reliable 80 pt players?^Yeah sort of
If everything pans out well for Mantha, if Blashill/Babcock improves what he needs to improve he WILL be a reliable 80pts+ 1st line winger, where as Wennberg is a safer NHLer but not with that elite potential. I will take that gamble.
I'm fine with that, really. Usually when you draft at #20 you end up with players with pro qualities and you pray they find the talent. Mantha has the talent in spades, but he has to find the pro qualities. It's still a gamble, but I'd take that second gamble over the first any day.
This.
Wennberg is great, but Mantha has a chance to be something special and something Detroit needs badly.
I don't think he's been terrible defensively, but I think he's been a bit risky with his play and positioning. I mean, I guess that's a part of the confidence factor, if he thinks he can pull it off, he'll go for it. I don't know that it's directly lead to an opposing goal thus far, but it's the plays on which he makes you hold your breath and say "please don't turn it over right here" that show his youth. These can all be ironed out of course, Detroit is a great place for him.
He has unfortunately lot common with Grigorenko. They're not same type of player, but still. Eventhough drafted different years, they are almost same age as well.
Even as Sabres fan I'm not too sure that Grigorenko can shape his game to the NHL level, and I'm even less sure that will happen with Mantha - even if you had Gandalf himself there guiding him.
He has unfortunately lot common with Grigorenko. They're not same type of player, but still. Eventhough drafted different years, they are almost same age as well.
Even as Sabres fan I'm not too sure that Grigorenko can shape his game to the NHL level, and I'm even less sure that will happen with Mantha - even if you had Gandalf himself there guiding him.
If you don't think this guy needs a lot of work to his committment defensively to play in the NHL regularly you are kidding yourself. We will see if he has it in him. Nobody's asking him to be Patrice Bergeron out there but he should be watching tape of Jeff Carter to see a big guy who doesn't play a prototypically "physical" game and see how he can affect a game for 200 feet.