HabzSauce
Registered User
- Jun 10, 2022
- 1,737
- 2,386
Man I really hope this guy blossoms into a stud
Not really because you compare a 20 year old with mostly 18 years old. Great for Mailloux, just not a very informative statsIt's not a good excuse but Mailloux lost some development time due to some unfortunate circumstance including covid. It's a cool stat and very fair imo.
Not a big fan of Mailloux so I don't know why I'm arguing, but if Mailloux keep up this pace he's going to wind up in the top-30 for most goals as defenseman in a season in the OHL history.Not really because you compare a 20 year old with mostly 18 years old. Great for Mailloux, just not a very informative stats
Regardless, Mailloux is doing better than a whole lot of previous 20 year olds.20 year olds often do better than 17-18 year olds in the OHL, so often that their gaudy stats are usually ignored... except for narrative builders like Grant McCagg
He should have used his wrister more when he was playing in Sweden, but let's not dwell on the past. It's a deadly wrister.I'm impressed by his wrister.
I didn't see many games so someone who does, is that wrister as deadly as it looked on that PP?
Isn't that why he got into trouble in Sweden? He tried to be a stud.Man I really hope this guy blossoms into a stud
That doesn't make sense. Are you telling us there were no 20-year-old defencemen in the OHL in the past 25 years? And by the way he is still only 19 but I guess you need to build your narrative by hook or crook.Not really because you compare a 20 year old with mostly 18 years old. Great for Mailloux, just not a very informative stats
Lol. I don't think there are many Dmen playing their FIRST 54 OHL games in their D+2 Season which is what the entire initial stat is based on.That doesn't make sense. Are you telling us there were no 20-year-old defencemen in the OHL in the past 25 years? And by the way he is still only 19 but I guess you need to build your narrative by hook or crook.
Who is being dishonest?Lol. I don't think there are many Dmen playing their FIRST 54 OHL games in their D+2 Season which is what the entire initial stat is based on.
19y vs 17y or 20y vs 18y is semantics, we Always compare in terms of D years. He is in his D+2 year so on average 2/3 years older than most good Ds in their first OHL Season.Who is being dishonest?
Your argument wasn't the first 54 OHL games in their D+2. You took exception to comparing a 20-year-old to 18-year-olds. Go read your posts.
Lo and behold you label him as a 20-year-old yet he'll play the whole season as a 19-year-old.
Tell me again who is being dishonest.
It’s a bit of a ‘chicken or egg’ issue. But to answer your question, one only has to examine London’s record before Mailloux and George returned to the Knights’ lineup and the team’s record after their return. Before their return, London floundered. After their return, the Knights have been one of the top teams in the OHL. You draw your own conclusion.Did Mailloux get better defensively, or does he just benefit from being in a strong team ?
Of the four goals that Mailloux scored in London’s last two two games, his shorthanded goal against Saginaw, a wrist shot from the point, was the most impressive. Few NHL players, let alone OHL players, have the ability to overpower a goalie using just a wrist shot from the point. When Mailloux arrives in Montreal, he will be bringing the best wrist shot from the point since Malakhov played with the team. Mailloux will be a real weapon that all opposing teams will have to account for.He should have used his wrister more when he was playing in Sweden, but let's not dwell on the past. It's a deadly wrister.
Amazing that this kid has only played a total of 54 OHL games total up to this point.Of the four goals that Mailloux scored in London’s last two two games, his shorthanded goal against Saginaw, a wrist shot from the point, was the most impressive. Few NHL players, let alone OHL players, have the ability to overpower a goalie using just a wrist shot from the point. When Mailloux arrives in Montreal, he will be bringing the best wrist shot from the point since Malakhov played with the team. Mailloux will be a real weapon that all opposing teams will have to account for.
No question. Mailloux has unlimited upside offensive potential. His vision, anticipation and elite shot are attributes that can’t be taught. Couple these innate abilities with Mailloux’s size and skating ability and you have a potential offensive star at the next level. One could only imagine what Mailloux’s game would be today if his development hadn’t been interrupted by his long periods of inactivity resulting from suspension and injury.Amazing that this kid has only played a total of 54 OHL games total up to this point.
I agree. This kid was born for offence. His defensive inclination seems to be an afterthought. As I have posted before, it would not surprise me if Mailloux is converted to power forward at the next level. He has the size, speed off the wing, vision, shot and offensive propensity to be a very successful NHL winger. The ‘Michigan’ move or otherwise.Who is being dishonest?
Your argument wasn't the first 54 OHL games in their D+2. You took exception to comparing a 20-year-old to 18-year-olds. Go read your post that I responded to.
Lo and behold you label him as a 20-year-old yet he'll play the whole season as a 19-year-old.
Tell me again who is being dishonest.
Anyway, if you have doubts about this player it shouldn't be his offense. That's legit. It's his defensive play that has me worried.
Sorry, why does it matter that he’s in his D2 season in this context?Its a cool stat but also very unfair since he is in his D2 season lol
He’s one of our most intriguing prospects for me. The kid has a ton of tools, the question will be, does he have the aptitude to develop on the finer parts of the game. Usually, I’d say, if hockey IQ is not great by 20 then it is very hard to improve, but Mailloux has missed a ton of hockey, so I’ll give him a bit longer before passing judgement. Kid can play, I think he’s good enough to carve out a career with just his talent alone.Regardless, Mailloux is doing better than a whole lot of previous 20 year olds.
I 100% agree, his raw tools are good enough to cover for some of his deficiencies on defence too imo. Kids going to play NHL minutes assuming the league doesn’t try to set an example out of Logan.Barring more injuries, Mailloux will carve out an nhl career. He has elite tools which are paramount to sticking in the big league.
Elite Size and speed, and an elite wrister. These attributes will give him every opportunity to play minutes in the NHL.
He also has a chance of becoming an impact player if he gets better with his decision making, defensive awareness and playmaking
As a long time litigation lawyer and for the past 10 years an executive director of a major amateur sport organization, I can confidently say that the NHL will not bar Mailloux from playing in the NHL. The last thing the NHL (and its sponsors) want is embarrassing litigation that will expose that league's rather uneven and selective position with respect to players' suspensions. Short of Mailloux being found in a bawdy house, he's playing in the NHL.I 100% agree, his raw tools are good enough to cover for some of his deficiencies on defence too imo. Kids going to play NHL minutes assuming the league doesn’t try to set an example out of Logan.
Sorry, why does it matter that he’s in his D2 season in this context?
Mark Streit had a good distance snap shotOf the four goals that Mailloux scored in London’s last two two games, his shorthanded goal against Saginaw, a wrist shot from the point, was the most impressive. Few NHL players, let alone OHL players, have the ability to overpower a goalie using just a wrist shot from the point. When Mailloux arrives in Montreal, he will be bringing the best wrist shot from the point since Malakhov played with the team. Mailloux will be a real weapon that all opposing teams will have to account for.