Prospect Info: Logan Mailloux Part 3 The Only Hockey Talk Thread

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,066
27,185
East Coast
I always felt myself for having played both RW and RHD it is much easier to read the play on D. You’re almost always facing the play and there is much less improv to the game. I obviously never played at these guy’s level, but I’m more worried about say Slaf’s IQ than Barron or Mailloux’s. D’s could always play within a system and rely on being big, mean and having a long reach.

It's more about NHL quality and that is high level. Guys like Barron and Mailloux are build from the front in vs the back out. We went through this with Beaulieu. Some figure it out and many don't. I have hope in both of them but it's up to them to figure it out. If they do, we got two very good assets. Learning to be the right position and limiting forwards from scoring chances is not easy. NHL forwards are clever and they know how to take advantage of guys who don't neutralize well.

Slaf is 18. I'll be harder on him when he is 20 or 21. He looked good against men at both the WC and Olympics but NHL is tough. Time and space is a big deal and Habs are focusing at the right area where we are trying to build good habits before we let him loose offensively. What he learns this season and how he prepares for next year will reveal a lot about his development direction at age 19 next year.
 
Last edited:

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,409
11,235
we already thin at RD why would we convert our best RD prospect to forward? Mailloux missed almost 2 years of hockey we just need to be patient with him
Calling Mailloux our best righthanded defenceman is indeed a case of damning him with the faintest of praise.

As some know here, there is no bigger booster of Mailloux as a prospect. But watching him closely this year (most games) I am concerned about his defensive instincts. He is at times a huge liability in the defensive zone. Often, instead of closing the gap on an opposing forward, he drops to one knee and tries to play goalie. While that may work at times at the OHL level, it is a prescription for failure in the NHL. On the other hand, Mailloux is strong if not dynamic, when he is on the rush. He has excellent offensive vision/creativity; skates as well if not better than most forwards, has size and one of the best shots in the OHL.

After watching Mailloux more than twenty times this year, I just don’t see an intuitive defensive approach to his game. Can he ultimately play defense in the NHL? Definitely. But from what I see so far, Mailloux may well prove to be a more impactful player playing forward than defence at the next level.

As I said earlier, the large periods of inactivity has caused chaos in Mailloux’s development. Let’s see what happens over the last half of the OHL season. Trying to gauge the pace of any player’s development is an inexact science. Maybe, just maybe, Mailloux can overcome the arrested development that has so clearly undermined his path to the NHL: whether as a defenceman or a forward.
 

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
20,860
11,464
Calling Mailloux our best righthanded defenceman is indeed a case of damning him with the faintest of praise.

As some know here, there is no bigger booster of Mailloux as a prospect. But watching him closely this year (most games) I am concerned about his defensive instincts. He is at times a huge liability in the defensive zone. Often, instead of closing the gap on an opposing forward, he drops to one knee and tries to play goalie. While that may work at times at the OHL level, it is a prescription for failure in the NHL. On the other hand, Mailloux is strong if not dynamic, when he is on the rush. He has excellent offensive vision/creativity; skates as well if not better than most forwards, has size and one of the best shots in the OHL.

After watching Mailloux more than twenty times this year, I just don’t see an intuitive defensive approach to his game. Can he ultimately play defense in the NHL? Definitely. But from what I see so far, Mailloux may well prove to be a more impactful player playing forward than defence at the next level.

As I said earlier, the large periods of inactivity has caused chaos in Mailloux’s development. Let’s see what happens over the last half of the OHL season. Trying to gauge the pace of any player’s development is an inexact science. Maybe, just maybe, Mailloux can overcome the arrested development that has so clearly undermined his path to the NHL: whether as a defenceman or a forward.
A full season or two at AHL level could possibly help him find and refine his defensive game (hopefully).
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
20,625
22,487
I truly believe he can be a Jeff Petry clone if he spends a couple of seasons in the AHL. I hope to God we don't rush him. He's my top habs prospect right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dutronc

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
20,625
22,487
If ges a jeff petry clone its gonna be another 6 years to see the fruits of his labour.. "if"..
I think Mailloux has the upper hand in that aspect because his identity as a player is more obvious. Petry found out he had a shot and could rush the puck up the ice when Subban left the team at the age of 28.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,409
11,235
I truly believe he can be a Jeff Petry clone if he spends a couple of seasons in the AHL. I hope to God we don't rush him. He's my top habs prospect right now.
Mailloux , while a good skater, does not have Petry’s fluidity nor his explosive lateral skating. Petry was for years one of the most underrated players in the league. His skating ability made Montreal a threat on 3 on 3’s. Once his shift was over, we had no chance of scoring.
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,621
7,037
Calling Mailloux our best righthanded defenceman is indeed a case of damning him with the faintest of praise.

As some know here, there is no bigger booster of Mailloux as a prospect. But watching him closely this year (most games) I am concerned about his defensive instincts. He is at times a huge liability in the defensive zone. Often, instead of closing the gap on an opposing forward, he drops to one knee and tries to play goalie. While that may work at times at the OHL level, it is a prescription for failure in the NHL. On the other hand, Mailloux is strong if not dynamic, when he is on the rush. He has excellent offensive vision/creativity; skates as well if not better than most forwards, has size and one of the best shots in the OHL.

After watching Mailloux more than twenty times this year, I just don’t see an intuitive defensive approach to his game. Can he ultimately play defense in the NHL? Definitely. But from what I see so far, Mailloux may well prove to be a more impactful player playing forward than defence at the next level.

As I said earlier, the large periods of inactivity has caused chaos in Mailloux’s development. Let’s see what happens over the last half of the OHL season. Trying to gauge the pace of any player’s development is an inexact science. Maybe, just maybe, Mailloux can overcome the arrested development that has so clearly undermined his path to the NHL: whether as a defenceman or a forward.
would an overager season help possibly?
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,409
11,235
would an overager season help possibly?
Its not an issue of the level of competition. But his innate intuitive abilities. I just haven’t seen enough that convinces me that Mailloux will be an impactful player as a defenceman at the NHL level. That may change. If we want to take the next step we need to accumulate as many impactful players as possible. Mailloux will play in the NHL. We need more than just that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson and Kojo

Tetragrammaton

Registered User
Mar 17, 2022
2,305
2,923
Mailloux is one of the main reasons we'll need a better development coach in the AHL as soon as possible.

He has the skills to be an effective player in the NHL, but he'll need someone to work with to help put everything together and improve on his weaknesses.. not someone who will sit him for veterans if he makes mistakes.
He should be put in the AHL for at least 1 season.
 

Kojo

Registered User
Nov 22, 2013
5,944
2,367
Its a cool stat but also very unfair since he is in his D2 season lol
It's not a good excuse but Mailloux lost some development time due to some unfortunate circumstance including covid. It's a cool stat and very fair imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad