jfm133
Registered User
- Nov 6, 2015
- 2,600
- 1,747
Again, Mailloux has some recovery to do for all the time he lost. Always strange to see guys definitive about 19-20 years old Ds. Mailloux has all the tools. How can you say he will never be as good or better than Guhle? His offensive production is already the same at 19 with all the time he missed. We will see for the defensive side.
About the coaches I was not answering you. Did you notice the stars I put there to try to show two parts? The machine is now automatically merging posts if you do them too quickly one after the other.
About the coaches I was not answering you. Did you notice the stars I put there to try to show two parts? The machine is now automatically merging posts if you do them too quickly one after the other.
1. Guhle is miles better defensively. The fact you think it was a relevant example tells a lot.
2. His lack of development time is definitely a concern. You often can't just catch up. You're shouting about what ifs, but they didn't happen so they aren't relevant. We're not evaluating potential in a potential environment. We are talking about actual development which has been lacking in his case.
3. I did not mention coaches in this thread AFAIK, so WTF you're on going about?
4. Again, Trudeau and Barron have nothing to do with Mailloux, neither do they have a similar path to Mailloux.