admiralcadillac
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2017
- 7,677
- 6,984
Its not even close to being the same…..like there’s zero link between the two.
And how they reacted to their incidents is a tale of two cities
Well one ended up with charges so…
Its not even close to being the same…..like there’s zero link between the two.
And how they reacted to their incidents is a tale of two cities
DécrocheWell one ended up with charges so…
The big problem I have with this is it doesn’t happen if Boston doesn’t stupidly do what they did and sign that psychopath. NHL is trying to save face. Mailloux did the things people were saying Mitch Miller would’ve had to do if he wanted redemption.Its not even close to being the same…..like there’s zero link between the two.
And how they reacted to their incidents is a tale of two cities
I wonder how many people under a similar microscope and level of scrutiny would have made it to the big leagues of their respective career paths?I was against the pick and there's definitely reasons to be skeptical about Mailloux's intentions (like with Miller, his victim claims he never apologized), but at the end of the day the organization has at least been smart enough to go through the right process with him. He's under a microscope and if he makes it to the big leagues it'll have been because he did his time properly..
Whether or not he's a bad person is something beyond our judgment, but if he is judged to have properly served his punishment than he deserves a shot. The Bruins and Miller failed to respect the process.
With Mailloux, it happened ONCE. He did apologize but not enough to the young lady's taste and request. While Miller was doing it on a daily basis....I was against the pick and there's definitely reasons to be skeptical about Mailloux's intentions (like with Miller, his victim claims he never apologized), but at the end of the day the organization has at least been smart enough to go through the right process with him. He's under a microscope and if he makes it to the big leagues it'll have been because he did his time properly..
Whether or not he's a bad person is something beyond our judgment, but if he is judged to have properly served his punishment than he deserves a shot. The Bruins and Miller failed to respect the process.
IndeedI wonder how many people under a similar microscope and level of scrutiny would have made it to the big leagues of their respective career paths?
Maybe not surprising to some, but I didn't expect that.
What happens to the 2018 WJ players once they are identified?Seems like a joke reaction from the league. Craig MacTavish played after literally killing a woman.
Miller was an exception because he didn't even try to make amends.
Nothing I betWhat happens to the 2018 WJ players once they are identified?
How is Evander Kane allowed in the league? They're opening Pandora's box here.What happens to the 2018 WJ players once they are identified?
The NHL’s arbitrariness and selectivity is truly breathtaking. If the NHLPA won’t act, the Canadiens have to take action to protect their player, who by all accounts has assiduously complied with all conditions imposed on him. They need a good lawyer. I know one.How is Evander Kane allowed in the league? They're opening Pandora's box here.
Do you know about "Cancel Culture"? This term is often used by the right to explain things that they used to be able to do, but now cannot.Seems like a joke reaction from the league. Craig MacTavish played after literally killing a woman.
Miller was an exception because he didn't even try to make amends.
Do you know about "Cancel Culture"? This term is often used by the right to explain things that they used to be able to do, but now cannot.
I think we need to look at this through a different lens.
If we applied the same logic that we are using today on what qualifies a player's ability to play or not in the NHL to players who played 20-30 years ago, it is likely that MANY would not be eligible to play today.
You know how there's this saying that a lot of people toss around "are you the same person you were 4 years ago as you are today?" Well why does this not apply to society as well? Humans are fluid, we change. So does what we expect from our society.
This means that you seriously CANNOT say "well 15 years ago, McTavish killed someone, so why is what Mailloux did worse??". Well that question has a simple answer: Because now we expect more from our players than we did when McTavish was playing. We expect more from our fellow human beings.
So the fact that the "rules of engagement" change is a good thing imo. Being under much harsher scrutiny today is a GOOD thing. We weren't there back then, but we are here now. And thus, we should expect different results than back then.
Probably just meet with them, like they said.The nhl can f*** off with their arbitrary bullshit what more can he do than he already is.
I find it hard to believe Gorton would sign Mailloux if he thought he couldn't play in NHLCan the NHL really keep this guy out or void is is contract because the is pass issue.
If yes, than what will happen with all the WJC players for the 2 incidents or player that might have had legal issue DUI/domestic disputes in the past, will they now be deem ineligible until the NHL clear them to play.
Not a completely fair comparison since Mailloux benefited from counselling, redemptive resources, a protective environment and a media spokesperson helping him navigate the roughest waters and carefully scheduled his public appearances among the help provided, all of it organized and paid for by the Habs.I wonder how many people under a similar microscope and level of scrutiny would have made it to the big leagues of their respective career paths?
Yes I think GB just didn’t want stay clear of a other PR situation condemning everything.I find it hard to believe Gorton would sign Mailloux if he thought he couldn't play in NHL
Different times back then. Google was not around and lots of stories would be tossed under the rug, only to resurface years later. Some would do it out of spite to tarnish someone's reputation, while other's were simply sailing through life never being held accountable for their past indiscretions until it was time they paid up. Bottom line, your reputation matters. Think twice.Seems like a joke reaction from the league. Craig MacTavish played after literally killing a woman.
Miller was an exception because he didn't even try to make amends.
Well one ended up with charges so…