Prospect Info: Logan Mailloux Part 3 The Only Hockey Talk Thread

NewDef

Registered User
Nov 2, 2015
804
1,363
I disagree with Reinbacher/Hutson as Reinbacher will be playing against the NHL's elite and Hutson will likely be sheltered 5 vs 5 on the third pairing.

Guhle - Reinbacher has all the makings of an elite shutdown/1st D pairing imo.

I think a player like Xhekaj would be a great partner for Mailloux as would Engstrom, Struble or Harris.
Xhekaj-Mailloux... who will want to mess with that! Dang! i could see it stylistically, age, current state vs mature state in 3 years. Yeah, i'd cheer for that!
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,821
37,138
His first game in the rookie tournament he f***ing sucked.

He's not NHL ready, but that's gotta be a boost to stick around.

I imagine he's there for the Mont-Tremblant retreat and then sent to Laval.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,230
72,971
Texas
His first game in the rookie tournament he f***ing sucked.

He's not NHL ready, but that's gotta be a boost to stick around.

I imagine he's there for the Mont-Tremblant retreat and then sent to Laval.
He is closer than many think. Could be ready in the 2nd half of the season.
 

NewDef

Registered User
Nov 2, 2015
804
1,363
He Wants, he's Able, and he currently is learning what it takes to be Ready. Could work out to be elite 3rd pair but iq short of 1st pair WITH size, bite, good to score a few. Those 2 big mean defs that says no mess with the boys but can absolutely play and contribute.

I love the direction the team is going, i respect the work needed to get there from where we were. I think the options are well exploited and the farm has some really nice prospects. Oh and we get a few good stories.. the Xhekaj brothers, Slaf and Mesar, RHP, Trudeau, Mailloux. The draft. It's entertainment eh? :)

in the next few years, the habs are trending toward to be a really good team, well managed, well coached, and with quality depth and upcomming players. I dunno, feels nice to have hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bopeep

rve24

Registered User
Oct 26, 2022
1,830
2,145
His first game in the rookie tournament he f***ing sucked.

He's not NHL ready, but that's gotta be a boost to stick around.

I imagine he's there for the Mont-Tremblant retreat and then sent to Laval.

How did he look the other games? Other than that first game.

I think he is not ready to play in the show. JMO living in London and seeing him live, PVR 100+ games. ( JrA, JrB, MM n spring camps)
But in no way would I base that opinion on his first game in a rookie tourney lol.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,821
37,138
How did he look the other games? Other than that first game.

I think he is not ready to play in the show. JMO living in London and seeing him live, PVR 100+ games. ( JrA, JrB, MM n spring camps)
But in no way would I base that opinion on his first game in a rookie tourney lol.
He played much better, but still not well enough to force a spot. He showed promise.

I'm thinking the Habs are keeping him around to get another pre-season game because he wasn't able to play any the past 2 seasons.
 

rve24

Registered User
Oct 26, 2022
1,830
2,145
He played much better, but still not well enough to force a spot. He showed promise.

I'm thinking the Habs are keeping him around to get another pre-season game because he wasn't able to play any the past 2 seasons.

Of course he isn't forcing a spot lol. No one should have expected that. No matter how he played in the 1st rookie scrimmage.
They are keeping him around cause he earned it.
Is this his 3rd eligible training camp or just 2nd? Your post suggests he has attended 2x before this year.
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,242
28,227
I don’t know. Guhle is so good at jumping in the play at the right time. That’s literally the only thing that Mailloux does that’s good. I wouldn’t want Guhle to hold himself back because his partner is untrustworthy.

Why would Guhle hold himself back? Mailloux's problems are positioning and decision-making in the D-zone. If the puck is moving forward, then that's not a problem anymore. Guhle also has the skating ability to get back in time if the puck is turned over.


I disagree with Reinbacher/Hutson as Reinbacher will be playing against the NHL's elite and Hutson will likely be sheltered 5 vs 5 on the third pairing.

Guhle - Reinbacher has all the makings of an elite shutdown/1st D pairing imo.

I think a player like Xhekaj would be a great partner for Mailloux as would Engstrom, Struble or Harris.

Hutson isn't going to be sheltered if he becomes a dominant offensive force in the NHL. Guys like Karlsson and Hughes are bad defensively but still play big minutes. Despite their defensive issues, their net impact on the ice is very positive because of how good they are offensively. You want them on the ice as much as possible.

Guhle-Reinbacher would be an awesome pairing, but you would only be able to have them on the ice for about 25 min out of 60.
If Guhle and Reinbacher are on separate pairings, then you have a really good all-around dman on the ice for 45-50 min out of 60.

A lot of teams have multiple great scoring lines. If you put Guhle - Reinbacher as a pairing you might be able to shut down McDavid's line, but then don't have much against Draisaitl's line. You can shut down Crosby's line, but not Malkin's line, etc.

Having Guhle and Reinbacher on different pairings gives you a chance to shut down the top 2 offensive lines.

Both Mailloux and Hutson have the potential to be big-time contributors when they are on the ice. By having a strong D partner like Guhle or Reinbacher, you help them maximize their potential.
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,155
12,383
Why would Guhle hold himself back? Mailloux's problems are positioning and decision-making in the D-zone. If the puck is moving forward, then that's not a problem anymore. Guhle also has the skating ability to get back in time if the puck is turned over.




Hutson isn't going to be sheltered if he becomes a dominant offensive force in the NHL. Guys like Karlsson and Hughes are bad defensively but still play big minutes. Despite their defensive issues, their net impact on the ice is very positive because of how good they are offensively. You want them on the ice as much as possible.

Guhle-Reinbacher would be an awesome pairing, but you would only be able to have them on the ice for about 25 min out of 60.
If Guhle and Reinbacher are on separate pairings, then you have a really good all-around dman on the ice for 45-50 min out of 60.

A lot of teams have multiple great scoring lines. If you put Guhle - Reinbacher as a pairing you might be able to shut down McDavid's line, but then don't have much against Draisaitl's line. You can shut down Crosby's line, but not Malkin's line, etc.

Having Guhle and Reinbacher on different pairings gives you a chance to shut down the top 2 offensive lines.

Both Mailloux and Hutson have the potential to be big-time contributors when they are on the ice. By having a strong D partner like Guhle or Reinbacher, you help them maximize their potential.

Karlsson and Hughes are far better skaters than Hutson can ever dream of becoming and both are sub par defensive players.......it is a poor comparison from the get go.

Hutson's upside is far more likely as a sheltered 3rd pairing PP specialist.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,743
10,732
Nova Scotia
Just think Knies could been ours. I thought he was the best prospect on either team. Including all our high picks Toronto really had some good looking prospect in that games. Considering drafting late and all the picks they traded away. No problems with their scouting.

Minten I thought was good also. Probably going to be better than Beck. Cowan was all over the ice, he going to be good player.
 

MadMslm

Registered User
Jun 16, 2018
2,111
2,530
Exactly the opposite; Harris is among the best defensive defensemen on the team, typically making smart, effective plays with the puck that take it out of dangerous positions while also maintaining possession.

He's the best defensive defenseman on the team, generally, and was dominant on first entering the league when paired with Savard.

Harris is undervalued because he’s likely the odd man out in mid/long term outlook, which is why most people tend to lessen his attributes and impact.

I don’t think he’s better than Guhle, but he certainly showed that he’s good in multiple facets of the game (easily a better player than Xhekaj who’s play is often excused because of the fighting/physical attributes).

Still has a lot of room to growth, but saying he was dominant is a stretch.

Like all rookies defensemen last year, he had good and bad moments.

Mailloux deserves an other game, I doubt he makes it over Barron (even though he looked better) because he needs more time to learn and experience things.

Also sending Barron back to the AHL might break his mental. Kid wasn’t happy to go down last year and won’t be this year either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReimanSum1908

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,821
37,138
Of course he isn't forcing a spot lol. No one should have expected that. No matter how he played in the 1st rookie scrimmage.
They are keeping him around cause he earned it.
Is this his 3rd eligible training camp or just 2nd? Your post suggests he has attended 2x before this year.
Clearly states he hasn't been able to attend the past 2 years, but ok.
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
21,948
25,809
yup. First mistake is Harris. Part execution, part decision. The chip to Mailloux was better choice.

Then is clearly unorthodox but Bech is checking air so Mailloux acts. Ylonen is puck watching.

Weakish goal by Primeau.
Yes. It is dishonest to blame one guy for that breakdown.
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
30,203
21,650
There’s a spot opened up with Matheson hurt and Barron sucking. Could be Maillouxs.

That said, the most important thing for him is to log big minutes- he’s missed so much time as is. Probably best if he does that in the AHL.

Dude I notice you're calling yourself the voice of reason.

If you actually were, you wouldn't need to say it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: morhilane

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,280
11,802
There’s a spot opened up with Matheson hurt and Barron sucking. Could be Maillouxs.

That said, the most important thing for him is to log big minutes- he’s missed so much time as is. Probably best if he does that in the AHL.
I would take Trudeau ahead of mailloux at this point for this line up if Matheson is injured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NewDef

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,269
71,016
There’s a spot opened up with Matheson hurt and Barron sucking. Could be Maillouxs.

That said, the most important thing for him is to log big minutes- he’s missed so much time as is. Probably best if he does that in the AHL.
Barron was great in the first game. I wouldn't make a big deal out of it. I'd love to see Mailloux play some AHL games before coming here. He's played 92 games in the past 2 seasons.
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,242
28,227
Karlsson and Hughes are far better skaters than Hutson can ever dream of becoming and both are sub par defensive players.......it is a poor comparison from the get go.

Hutson's upside is far more likely as a sheltered 3rd pairing PP specialist.

I don't know why you are talking about skating. Being a great skater doesn't make you good defensively.

Maybe Hughes and Karlsson would be better than Hutson at certain areas such as defending against rush chances, but worse at other areas of defending.

Overall, Karlsson and Hughes are bad defensively, but they still don't get sheltered. There's no reason for Hutson to be sheltered if he is dominant offensively. With him on the ice maybe there will be more goal against, but there will also be a lot more goals for.

3rd pairing pp specialist is Hutson's floor, not his ceiling.
 

ZUKI

I hate the haters...
Oct 23, 2003
14,257
4,649
montreal
Beck does.

I'd tell him to do the opposite of Suzuki and work on his O game.

Give Maillou 2, or 3 pre-season games and send him down with others who are close and let them (hopefully) tear up the A
am i the only one that read “to work on his Organ “ ?
okay… i’m the only one 🙁
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad