dackelljuneaubulis02
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2012
- 11,885
- 7,507
Yeah like even though you could see the defensive lapses they didn’t seem too egregious or unworkable. I was very heartened to see that.Agreed. There are few defencemen that are perfect. Most have some deficiencies/weaknesses. Mailloux's defensive shortcomings, while noticeable, are, like most things on boards like this, exaggerated. For example, against the Devils, was he a greater defensive liability than Xhekaj? In assessing any young player you look at the total package and where growth/development is necessary. And whether such growth is probable. In Mailloux's case we have an intriguing prospect whose offensive skills are already NHL level. With any growth, these skills will become elite level. If and when that happens, I doubt his defensive deficiencies, whatever they are, will preclude him from being an impact player at the next level. Such is his offensive upside. As I have said, the idle talk of trading this young, promising player borders on complete folly.
Every time I’ve seen him this preseason/camp he’s been a net positive and by a good margin. You can see the room for improvement. I’ve been fairly cautious with my projections of him but seeing is believing. Enormous upside and doesn’t seem like a long shot. Inspired pick.