GDT: Let the Free Agency Madness begin

Status
Not open for further replies.

SlavinAway

Registered Jerk
Sponsor
Jul 7, 2017
3,226
12,158
This is my worry, he's the ultimate sell-high candidate. Everyone getting hyper-focused on his career year last yeara is forgetting prior he averaged 8G, 30A in 53GP/year. Still solid production but not worth more than like $5-6M/yr
As opposed to buying high on players as the Borg has been they must really believe this wasn’t a fluke. I’m a bit nervous but they’ve earned the benefit of the doubt in my book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cptjeff and geehaad

WreckingCrew

Registered User
Feb 4, 2015
13,431
41,047
As opposed to buying high on players as the Borg has been they must really believe this wasn’t a fluke. I’m a bit nervous but they’ve earned the benefit of the doubt in my book.
I'd still much rather go after another scoring forward. I'm tired of watching our impotent offense whiff on easy shots, fail to get to any rebounds, and make blind passes. Also tired of watching nobody screen the goalie as he watches our defense take long bombs that either go off the players 2 ft in front of them, or sail to an unimpeded goalie.
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
I think at the end the deal is going to determine the feel of the move. But either way it will be a big risk for a guy we hope plays more than 70% of the games over the next 4 seasons.

I thought we had learned our lesson with trading own rentals and acquiring a puck mover to replace that own rental.

If we add one asset from the Pesce deal to acquire Karlsson at 30-40% retained, that will be acceptable i guess.

I would much prefer get a young scorer with our assets even if Karlsson may outscore that acquisition next season.
 

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,751
9,128
1) It's been reported by Dreger (in the video up in this thread) that Pesce does not have SJ on his trade list, so he can't be traded there without him approving. Not sure why he'd approve to go from a cup contender to a bottom dweller. That doesn't mean Carolina can't trade Pesce somewhere else and then use those assets to send to SJ though.
2) I would think that the Ducks would want more than a 2nd round pick to retain 50% for 4 more years. If it was 1 year, then yeah, a mid-late round pick would suffice, but 4 years of a high dollar contract is a lot to ask of a team for only a 2nd.

He might approve it, because the basement dwellers trying to make the floor have money, and the contenders don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stickpucker

TheReelChuckFletcher

Former TheRillestPaulFenton; Harverd Alum
Jun 30, 2011
10,960
25,005
Raleigh and Chapel Hill, NC
He might approve it, because the basement dwellers trying to make the floor have money, and the contenders don't.

I think that the Canes will accomodate Pesce and actually send him to a team that wants to win games. Nashville or Edmonton, in my book. I don't think Toronto is at the point yet where they want to trade Nylander.
 

Chan790

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
4,049
2,724
Bingy town, NY
We Can't Trade Skjei because we shouldn't be trading our left D for another Right D.
I have a suspicion that we're probably trading Skjei regardless.

We prefer to not play guys on their off-side if we can avoid it, he's not beating out Orlov or Slavin to keep a top-4 job, and he's rather expensive for a 3rd-pair LHD. We can better allocate that cap.
 

Sigurd

Slavin, our Lord and Saver (AKA Extra Goalie)
Feb 4, 2018
1,852
5,312
North Carolina
I'd still much rather go after another scoring forward. I'm tired of watching our impotent offense whiff on easy shots, fail to get to any rebounds, and make blind passes. Also tired of watching nobody screen the goalie as he watches our defense take long bombs that either go off the players 2 ft in front of them, or sail to an unimpeded goalie.
So, SO much this. All of this.

In an ideal world, Elias Pettersson or Auston Matthews would be available, and we make a blockbuster trade for one of them (especially with our surplus of defensemen which both of their respective teams need). A tier below those super-star players, and not even an all-star forward like Keller is available though; not surprisingly since they don't grow on trees.

Count me as one of those hoping Pettersson will be available at the trade deadline though (since someone else brought that up) after he requests a trade in his final year on a dumpster fire team. Long shot of us getting him though.
 

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,751
9,128
I think that the Canes will accomodate Pesce and actually send him to a team that wants to win games. Nashville or Edmonton, in my book. I don't think Toronto is at the point yet where they want to trade Nylander.

If he wanted to win games, he'd have just resigned in Carolina. Man wants to get paid, and justifiably so, I think.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,287
101,840
He might approve it, because the basement dwellers trying to make the floor have money, and the contenders don't.
True, but basement dwellers can sign him in a year when he hits UFA. He doesn't have to want to go to one now.

Of course, I said the same about Skinner and was dead wrong on him.
 
Last edited:

SvechneJerk

Christ is King
Jul 15, 2018
1,603
6,265
NC
I'd still much rather go after another scoring forward. I'm tired of watching our impotent offense whiff on easy shots, fail to get to any rebounds, and make blind passes. Also tired of watching nobody screen the goalie as he watches our defense take long bombs that either go off the players 2 ft in front of them, or sail to an unimpeded goalie.
Assuming that we are indeed in pursuit of EK, the rumor that we basically had an agreement in place for Tarasenko (I forget who it was that released that info in the last day or so) means - to me, anyway - that we are intending to get a scoring forward, too. How they’re going about it achieving that now that he’s not an option, I don’t know.
 

chaz4hockey

Old man but still a PP2 Candidate
Sponsor
Jan 21, 2021
8,270
17,599
Naples, FL
If he wanted to win games, he'd have just resigned in Carolina. Man wants to get paid, and justifiably so, I think.
Well, he's made almost $27M to-date and probably at the low end will make another $25-30M going forward. How much more does one need?

If it was me, I'd select playing in a city I like, players I enjoy playing with and in particular a Coach I favor (let alone playing on a winning team is much more enjoyable than on a losing team). Thus, if I was with the Canes and met that profile I'd take a home team discount. Of course, that's me who is someone that doesn't believe that money should be the only aspect of one's work life.

btw: I wouldn't trade Pesce to the Oilers or any SC possible team.....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bridgeburner96

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,287
101,840
Not sure if this was previously reported. The guy's profile says he's an Athletic contributor and amateur scout.



 

Stickpucker

Playmaka
Jan 18, 2014
16,196
39,317
Assuming that we are indeed in pursuit of EK, the rumor that we basically had an agreement in place for Tarasenko (I forget who it was that released that info in the last day or so) means - to me, anyway - that we are intending to get a scoring forward, too. How they’re going about it achieving that now that he’s not an option, I don’t know.

Un ofre hostile
 

AhosDatsyukian

Registered User
Sep 25, 2020
11,405
33,283
I like Rizzo, a long shot but he’s been great for Denver and where he was picked. Would rather we don’t trade him for TDA but it wouldn’t be super consequential if we did…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad