I think both SJ and Chicago are going to want more futures to hold $2.5M dead cap for that amount of time. I think Calgary will get much better offers. Philly trade might be ok.Trying as much as possible to take into account other teams' needs, while also attempting to not make moves that would both reduce any leverages in other moves & screw us up Cap-wise after this year, how about this...
TRADE 1: 3-way trade for Karlsson
SJ retains $2.5M
SJ receives:
Pesce (fills immediate RD need; can also flip at TDL for another 1st/other assets)2024 1st (CAR)CHICAGO retains $2.5M
CHICAGO receives:
Skjei (fills immediate LD need; can also flip at TDL for a 1st/other assets)Honka/Heimosalmi (fills RD need in their pipeline)CAROLINA receives:
Karlsson at $6.5M AAV
TRADE 2
CALGARY receives:
TeravainenSuzukiGunler*This assumes Lindholm's refusal to sign ext. w/ CGY. Intentionally didn't trade any American-born players, due to Calgary's recent issues with that.CAROLINA receives:
Lindholm
TRADE 3 (*Could be broken into 2 separate trades, if needed)
PHILADELPHIA receives:
2023 2nd (PHI)2025 1st (CAR) or Morrow, if necessaryDruryKevin WallCAROLINA receives:
KonecnyTDA at $2.5M
CAP SPACE AFTER MOVES - $1,570,583
Cap-wise, we can extend everyone, as needed, after next season without issue.
Svech-Aho-Konecny
Bunting-Lindholm-Necas
Noesen-KK-Jarvis
Martinook-Staal-Fast
Slavin-EK
Orlov-Burns
Chatfield-TDA
Andersen
Raanta
More so was meaning highly rated prospect that never really got a shot in Detroit. I’m fine with bigger game hunting.Maybe, maybe not. We don’t seem to do like the canes did years ago and take guys off the trash heap.
Either way, I suspect someone will claim him before we get a chance.
And besides all of that, will Skjei and Pesce waive to go to those two clubs?
I know it doesn't show on cap friendly, but I could have sworn I heard he had trade protection that kicked in this July 1st for his last year.So, Skjei has a 10-team no trade list. That list would've been submitted like 2 days ago.
Pesce, as far as I can tell on CapFriendly, has no trade protection and can be sent anywhere.
I guess it depends on whether those clubs are on their NTC lists. I obviously have no idea.I think both SJ and Chicago are going to want more futures to hold $2.5M dead cap for that amount of time. I think Calgary will get much better offers. Philly trade might be ok.
And besides all of that, will Skjei and Pesce waive to go to those two clubs?
As far as I recall, it's been pretty widely reported he had a 15 team clause that kicked in July 1. I was listening to the Ray and Dregs podcast this morning and I believe Dreger said SJ was a team he'd have to waive to go to, for additional context.I know it doesn't show on cap friendly, but I could have sworn I heard he had trade protection that kicked in this July 1st for his last year.
I know it doesn't show on cap friendly, but I could have sworn I heard he had trade protection that kicked in this July 1st for his last year.
I still remember the absolute bullshit that Montreal fans were giving as reasoning for us to take Zadina instead of Svech. "Oh, Zadina played with Necas at the WJC, they already have chemistry"In hindsight, I think we made the right choice between Zadina and Svechnikov.
Man if this is true we really are turning into Moscow west. Hope someone has KHL/SKA connections.
If the Canes can get Tarasenko to sign for a year, that may open the Canes to simply trading Skjei and Pesce for futures packages.
Pesce + Skjei + 1st + one of our higher D prospects for $5M retention on EK? f*** THAT hell no...even retained they'd be lucky to get half those assets. $2.5M retention is probably worth 2nd/3rd at best.Trying as much as possible to take into account other teams' needs, while also attempting to not make moves that would both reduce any leverages in other moves & screw us up Cap-wise after this year, how about this...
TRADE 1: 3-way trade for Karlsson
SJ retains $2.5M
SJ receives:
Pesce (fills immediate RD need; can also flip at TDL for another 1st/other assets)2024 1st (CAR)CHICAGO retains $2.5M
CHICAGO receives:
Skjei (fills immediate LD need; can also flip at TDL for a 1st/other assets)Honka/Heimosalmi (fills RD need in their pipeline)CAROLINA receives:
Karlsson at $6.5M AAV
TRADE 2
CALGARY receives:
TeravainenSuzukiGunler*This assumes Lindholm's refusal to sign ext. w/ CGY. Intentionally didn't trade any American-born players, due to Calgary's recent issues with that.CAROLINA receives:
Lindholm
TRADE 3 (*Could be broken into 2 separate trades, if needed)
PHILADELPHIA receives:
2023 2nd (PHI)2025 1st (CAR) or Morrow, if necessaryDruryKevin WallCAROLINA receives:
KonecnyTDA at $2.5M
CAP SPACE AFTER MOVES - $1,570,583
Cap-wise, we can extend everyone, as needed, after next season without issue.
Svech-Aho-Konecny
Bunting-Lindholm-Necas
Noesen-KK-Jarvis
Martinook-Staal-Fast
Slavin-EK
Orlov-Burns
Chatfield-TDA
Andersen
Raanta
Getting Karlsson at $6.5M would cost a ton, especially if you're asking a third team to retain $2.5M for 4 years. You're not pullng that off by giving up pieces like Suzuki and mid round picks.Pesce + Skjei + 1st + one of our higher D prospects for $5M retention on EK? f*** THAT hell no...even retained they'd be lucky to get half those assets. $2.5M retention is probably worth 2nd/3rd at best.
Trade 2 is ok-ish
Trade 3 probably take out the 1st/Morrow and I'd be OK
if we are trading these dudes for futures. just offer sheet Bouchard, please. so much better for our short and long term cap
I guess it’s a good thing that I didn’t have Suzuki or mid round picks in that Karlsson proposal, then.Getting Karlsson at $6.5M would cost a ton, especially if you're asking a third team to retain $2.5M for 4 years. You're not pullng that off by giving up pieces like Suzuki and mid round picks.
It's why doing a trade with only SJ (where they retain like $3M) is the more likely play.
.... I was responding to the person who felt you were giving up too much. What you proposed is what I think is fairly close to what it would take to get 2 teams to retain $2.5M and let us have EK at $6.5M.I guess it’s a good thing that I didn’t have Suzuki or mid round picks in that Karlsson proposal, then.
Ah, my mistake. Carry on..... I was responding to the person who felt you were giving up too much. What you proposed is what I think is fairly close to what it would take to get 2 teams to retain $2.5M and let us have EK at $6.5M.
That is assuming he stays elite (which isn’t likely) and he stays healthy (more unlikely).View attachment 725798
In all seriousness, though, Karlsson only has four seasons remaining. I would rather have that many seasons of elite play than 8 seasons of good-to-very good.