Confirmed with Link: Leafs Trade: Liljegren to San Jose for Matt Benning, 3rd and 6th

Community

44 is Rielly good
Oct 30, 2010
6,955
1,933
The Darkest Timeline
Well it’s better then trading a really good asset like kadri at his best value for peanuts like dubie dubes did lol
Kadri was definitely not at his best value when he was traded... He just had his 3rd straight season of declining point totals and second straight season with a suspension in the playoffs.

The trade didn't work out for the Leafs, but I understand the motivation for that trade a lot more than this one.

I think Liljegren should've gotten some more games to try and prove that he's better than our other 3rd pairing options.
 

Burnie97

Registered User
Jun 26, 2015
14,742
13,851
Canada
Holy shit. Someone on this board literally mentioned benning earlier today :laugh:. Sharks is a great team for Liljegren to go to and grow his game

Whats the cap savings on this deal?
Yeah I saw someone mention that yesterday, or today. Good call.

You can pretty much bury that contract and put him on waivers to go to the AHL and you get 2 draft picks. A 3rd for this year. Not to shabby.

All the best to Lilly. He'll get plenty of ice there now but he's out west on a bad team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PROUD PAPA and Budz

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,358
52,589
Bridging and to trade him for some value if they needed to. Pretty simple.
This is better than the nothing we'd get from not arbitration signing him. It was a no brainer which is why I never got the angst, except if you thought we would have to pay to rid ourselves of him. That never happens, he has a short deal and someone would always take a chance on him. Again, it was no brainer to sign him. You could argue we should have some cases him more to start the year, but that's it.
 

dubplatepressure

Registered User
Jul 10, 2007
15,967
3,617
This is better than the nothing we'd get from not arbitration signing him. It was a no brainer which is why I never got the angst, except if you thought we would have to pay to rid ourselves of him. That never happens, he has a short deal and someone would always take a chance on him. Again, it was no brainer to sign him. You could argue we should have some cases him more to start the year, but that's it.

exactly. Or waivers which we'd need to do soon anyway. Either way, nothing to complain about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarkKnight

fahad203

Registered User
Oct 3, 2009
38,527
22,160
I was really hoping that we found a gem at 17 the year he dropped
Was really excited. But he really has shown nothing for me to get excited about

You really coudln't rely on him. Has a tendencies of coughing up the puck at oddest times in oddest areas
 

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,381
17,787
People need to read up on player elected arbitration. Tre’s hands were tied. There’s no way he was going to lose an asset for nothing by letting him go unqualified.

No GM is going to trade for a player with player elected arbitration because then you give up assets for a player you could potentially lose.

Tre signed Liljegren for cheaper than what he probably would have been awarded in arbitration anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zonk and horner

Roo

Registered User
Oct 3, 2005
4,051
1,184
Oakville
The cap space and picks are good given his value was rock bottom. That said, not great management of your asset. Good deal for SJ buying low on a kid with upside who simply wasn’t fitting with the new coach.

I hope he does well there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToMaLe and TheShape

Leafsfan74

Registered User
Jul 2, 2018
5,247
5,569
At least he goes to a western team and isn't located in Canada.

Not to be rude and man does this betray my faith so I will have to ask for forgiveness later, but, if the Leafs were looking to run deeper I would have welcomed him being traded to one of the teams they might meet in the playoffs.

Three or four years ago I saw some development. He was exposed repeatedly in the playoffs though. Boston in particular constantly focused on his side of the ice when he was on, he just couldn't ever meet the physical demands. T.B did the same. You can't be a healthy playoff scratch every year, it was for just cause.

One of those guys who just didn't reach the threshold needed for hard hockey and at $3M a year it was untenable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo

PromisedLand

I need more FOOD
Dec 3, 2016
44,866
60,117
Hogwarts
And there goes the last of our undersized, skilled defensemen who we drafted. I think Liljegren is better than he was given credit for by the coaches, both Keefe and Berube. But if he’s not their type there’s no point holding him and letting him go to waste.

Good luck to him.

the moment mccabe was signed Liljegren was extra body with too much cap space really

Rielly Tanev
OEL McCabe

Leafs top4 is kinda set now at least for the next 3 to 4 yars means Lily is the odd man out and too expensive to be a bottom pair who doesn't PK or plays FU hockey
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,470
12,042
I question if it was the right time to move him, but if we weren't going to use him it doesn't make sense to keep him
 

MSZ

Car guy
Oct 5, 2014
10,260
11,405
Scarborough
Not to be rude and man does this betray my faith so I will have to ask for forgiveness later, but, if the Leafs were looking to run deeper I would have welcomed him being traded to one of the teams they might meet in the playoffs.

Three or four years ago I saw some development. He was exposed repeatedly in the playoffs though. Boston in particular constantly focused on his side of the ice when he was on, he just couldn't ever meet the physical demands. T.B did the same. You can't be a healthy playoff scratch every year, it was for just cause.

One of those guys who just didn't reach the threshold needed for hard hockey and at $3M a year it was untenable.
If he somehow ended up to be a Norris candidate in the future and he is with Florida or Boston, then the Leafs would be f***ed.

SJ is the perfect spot for him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad