HamiltonNHL
Resigning Marner == Running it back
- Jan 4, 2012
- 22,710
- 13,884
No, there is never a bad time to add a guy like Tavares.
There sure is.
No, there is never a bad time to add a guy like Tavares.
You could argue they missed most of step 1 too.There's a standard model to rebuild that teams like the Penguins, Tampa, and Chicago follow which have allowed them to bottom out and win again before the Leafs have so much as even contended.
The Leafs just haven't figured it out yet.
1. Trade high-priced and valuable players for picks.
2. Reduce team payroll as much as possible.
3. Monetize excess cap space by taking on bad contracts in exchange for even more draft picks
4. Finish bottom of standings to acquire lottery picks
5. Draft the highest skilled most promising prospects
6. Build from net out ensuring a diverse prospect pool
7. Effectively develop prospects in the minor leagues.
8. Identify and acquire character players to help younger teammates transition successfully
9. Take a prudent approach when extending players aways keeping the salary cap in mind
10. Stay away from unrestricted free agency until ready to contend
The Leafs missed out on steps 3, 6, 9, and 10.
A good rebuilt team builds up a massive pool of assets and roster talents on their way down. They add the core pieces once they hit rock bottom. The Leafs just tanked and drafted MNM.
Signed Tavares and instantly went "all-in".
So the Leafs started with the core. One whiff of the playoffs and they started spending all their assets propping up the roster. That's why pushing them forward so fast was a mistake.
They should have been selling for a year or two more.
Building the depth and asset pool. Then going ahead full steam. The Leafs tried to rush the rebuild by skipping steps and have now stagnated as a result.
It's an indictment on everyone who sat at that table and decided there was a short cut to success.
It most certainly was.I still don't think signing JT was a mistake.
1. Trade high-priced and valuable players for picks.
2. Reduce team payroll as much as possible.
3. Monetize excess cap space by taking on bad contracts in exchange for even more draft picks
4. Finish bottom of standings to acquire lottery picks
5. Draft the highest skilled most promising prospects
6. Build from net out ensuring a diverse prospect pool
7. Effectively develop prospects in the minor leagues.
8. Identify and acquire character players to help younger teammates transition successfully
9. Take a prudent approach when extending players aways keeping the salary cap in mind
10. Stay away from unrestricted free agency until ready to contend
The Leafs missed out on steps 3, 6, 9, and 10.
You could argue they missed most of step 1 too.
Yeah they got a 1st for Kessel and a 2nd in the Phaneuf deal but they let other guys walk to free agenct (JVT/Bozak/Gardiner) etc. Had they not tried to accelerate the rebuild those 3 should have been traded out too for prospects/picks. They would have had more assets to buy with when the time came.
The spent more assets on acquiring Babcock (a 3rd) acquiring Lou (another 3rd ) and getting rid of marleau (a 1st) than the got selling off high priced veterans almost.
No, there is never a bad time to add a guy like Tavares.
We have a Vezina caliber goalie that is not getting any younger at 29 years old and probably has 4-6 years of top end play left.
We have a Norris caliber Defensemen who just entered the prime of his career.
We have a franchise center with more skill than pretty much all but 3-4 players in the league and only 21 years old.
We have a top tier wing on par with the very best in the league and only 21 years old.
We have a whole host of young players with lots of skill and ceiling still.
We have 2 veterans creating an emotionally stable platform for these young guys to build off of, but both are in the final year or two of their career.
We have some very talented youth still coming up from the minors who fit to be key components of future Leafs teams.
There certainly is, and we found it.No, there is never a bad time to add a guy like Tavares.
Signing Tavares was a mistake, but is mostly a defensible one. Adding an elite #1C for nothing more than cap space WAS a coup and it WAS supposed to start the parade of good ol' Toronto boys wanting to come home. The follow-on effect of it completely destroying our cap structure and inviting the overpayments of Matthews and Marner can be somewhat attributed to Tavares, but should mostly be left on the shoulders of Dubas.
The real crime, however, was in assigning him the Captaincy. JT does not give off any indication of being able to lead a book club, much less a team in an extremely competitive environment. This was always Matthews' team and putting the C on the blandest of bland is where I think we really went off the rails. Captain Uninspiring and Dubas caving on contracts led this to be a team about Marner and Matthews' egos, first and foremost, and once Babcock was turfed for a player-favourite coach who was made to apologize publicly every time he breathed a negative word about Marner, the course was set.
There were other management wins and losses along the way, but most teams deal with that sort of thing. Where we really lost is that we crowned the boys king before they ever pulled the sword from the stone or slew the giant. I suppose that counts as rushing the rebuild.
I don’t know if rushing it is correct.I'd definitely imagine most fans would, in retrospect, preferred the team to have gone down a different path now that we have the luxury of hindsight. There are many things this team could and should have done differently.
But there's few teams that would have passed on gambling that they could have made things working given the opportunity to sign a player like this. There's a reason why the overwhelmingly majority of fans and commentators were supportive/happy with the decision (and more than a bit amusing that a few folks are pretending they felt otherwise)
I don’t know if rushing it is correct.
If our stars played the game anyway similar to Boston/Florida or produced playoff time like McDavid/Draisaitl it would be a different story.
They don’t. So for me it wasn’t so much rushing as it was allowed to go on too long. Things should have been done before the NMC kicked in.
That's because most leaf fans are hypocrites and overly emotional. They didn't have the maturity to want to stick with what they whined about wanting for a decade and immediately folded as soon as this team was set for the playoffs.I'd definitely imagine most fans would, in retrospect, preferred the team to have gone down a different path now that we have the luxury of hindsight. There are many things this team could and should have done differently.
But there's few teams that would have passed on gambling that they could have made things working given the opportunity to sign a player like this. There's a reason why the overwhelmingly majority of fans and commentators were supportive/happy with the decision (and more than a bit amusing that a few folks are pretending they felt otherwise)
They did rush it. They should have traded JVR and Bozak in their final year. AM or Morgan(my choice) should have been named Captain. They shouldn’t have signed JT. And they wasted so many picks and signed bad contracts all in the name of adding vets garbage. Marleau was so bad on many fronts.
They did rush it. They should have traded JVR and Bozak in their final year. AM or Morgan(my choice) should have been named Captain. They shouldn’t have signed JT. And they wasted so many picks and signed bad contracts all in the name of adding vets garbage. Marleau was so bad on many fronts.
A whole 3 years huh?Lou Lam was the problem, he had tons of $s to upgrade the roster because the young stars were on ELCs but he didn't know how, his 3 years at the helm were a total waste.
I agree with much of what you're saying, but how do you know they didn't try to move Bozak/Gardiner/JVR? Perhaps they were give pennies to the dollar trade proposals. Maybe they felt like these players could mentor the young pups.You could argue they missed most of step 1 too.
Yeah they got a 1st for Kessel and a 2nd in the Phaneuf deal but they let other guys walk to free agenct (JVT/Bozak/Gardiner) etc. Had they not tried to accelerate the rebuild those 3 should have been traded out too for prospects/picks. They would have had more assets to buy with when the time came.
The spent more assets on acquiring Babcock (a 3rd) acquiring Lou (another 3rd ) and getting rid of marleau (a 1st) than the got selling off high priced veterans almost.
yes there is, just look at the guy in your avatar, Burke didn't even have the team properly made (cake not baked) and he blew his wad on getting Kessel who imo is icing on the cake, it resulted in putting the team back years. Trade Kessel (icing) to a fully baked cake (Pittsburgh) and you have a wonderful dessert.........No, there is never a bad time to add a guy like Tavares.
I don’t know if rushing it is correct.
If our stars played the game anyway similar to Boston/Florida or produced playoff time like McDavid/Draisaitl it would be a different story.
They don’t. So for me it wasn’t so much rushing as it was allowed to go on too long. Things should have been done before the NMC kicked in.