Daisy Jane
everything is gonna be okay!
- Jul 2, 2009
- 70,377
- 9,634
It absolutely stupidly accelerated the rebuild and inflated contracts for many reasons.
i don't think it accelerated anything. - not in the way you mean (personally) the team was doing very well without JT, and I think JT has some strengths. (I'm not really going get into the whole "JT sucks, No he doesn't argument. etc" he is what he is. and I do think he brings some good strength to this team, he has his struggles and i feel he gets the WBS (whipping boy stick) because people see him as the cause of the teams problems.
but if you remove him - say we don't sign him at all. and we relatively just keep fair to middling people until we do well. I think honestly the team is still talented enough to make the playoffs. and the team itself shows that they are capable of at least forcing game sevens
You could argue (and it would be fair) that signing him skewed the payment but it seems to me that even if you didn't bring JT here, none of these players had any intention of doing bridge deals or taking less money (or doing the Towes/Kane/Keith, Crosby stuff for as much as they were able). I've always said if you have a number in your head, and the player is like no, and I'll sit out if i don't get paid, i would flat out sit them out. Nylander held out. we caved. Mitch was gonna hold out, we caved, and they weren't going to fuss with matthews.
Not one of them (or even as a collective trio) said that "you know what, we'll take less so you can continue to get better players to push us over the edge." as a whole - they haven't collectively stepped it up or committed to doing what it takes in the playoffs. and then management (collectively) bent over and and said it's okay just take what you want from us and we'll make due.
That's not on JT and I don't believe if he wasn't here this changes.