Post-Game Talk: Leafs lose.

Status
Not open for further replies.

IPS

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
16,483
27,086
Im more the conspiracy guy. My reasons are numerous, but mostly its money. TV deals come with full arenas. Hockey has always been a hard sell south of the border. So you come down harder on canadian teams.

Why the Leafs more? Because you can. 99% of leagues fans love when the Leafs get suspended, and Leafs fans that get upset? Just conspiracy nuts, or homer glasses.

Now as for personal reasons there are many of those as well. Shanahan apparently made some enemies in head office when he was DOPS.
I haven't even started on the insane number of conflicts of interest the league does absolutely nothing about.
And as far as a conspiracy this isn't exactly hard to pull off. Walkom is the director of officiating. He hires and fires the refs. Theres an entire court case online with emails between Campbell and Walkom with Campbell directing him on how the League wants calls. One of the officials who didnt tow the line was fired.
The league has admitted to game management. How far of a stretch is it really to go to influencing games through officials?
The funny thing is a lot of what you're saying isn't much of a "conspiracy" at all. It's all well documented. Shanahan making some enemies at the DOPS is the only thing that really sticks out as speculation.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,372
Toronto
Im more the conspiracy guy. My reasons are numerous, but mostly its money. TV deals come with full arenas. Hockey has always been a hard sell south of the border. So you come down harder on canadian teams.

Why the Leafs more? Because you can. 99% of leagues fans love when the Leafs get suspended, and Leafs fans that get upset? Just conspiracy nuts, or homer glasses.

Now as for personal reasons there are many of those as well. Shanahan apparently made some enemies in head office when he was DOPS.
I haven't even started on the insane number of conflicts of interest the league does absolutely nothing about.
And as far as a conspiracy this isn't exactly hard to pull off. Walkom is the director of officiating. He hires and fires the refs. Theres an entire court case online with emails between Campbell and Walkom with Campbell directing him on how the League wants calls. One of the officials who didnt tow the line was fired.
The league has admitted to game management. How far of a stretch is it really to go to influencing games through officials?
The NHL's biggest partner who is Rogers owns us. Leafs winning the cup would be dismissed by the same things. At the end of the day, I'm beyond pissed at that 5 on 3. But, to tell me its a calculated event tying to a larger conspiracy is it beyond questionable when you evaluate it by Occam's Razor.

At the end of the day, I don't want excuses. Pull it off. Give me one before I die.
 

IPS

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
16,483
27,086
The NHL's biggest partner who is Rogers owns us. Leafs winning the cup would be dismissed by the same things. At the end of the day, I'm beyond pissed at that 5 on 3. But, to tell me its a calculated event tying to a larger conspiracy is it beyond questionable when you evaluate it by Occam's Razor.
Occam's razor would have also completely dismantled the Gulf of Tonkin being a false flag as a precursor to start a war in Vietnam until it got admitted to year's later.

Occam's Razor is sometimes not the best tool for deciphering things of this nature.

But anyways that's where I'm stopping before this goes way off topic.
 

Tlo1

Registered User
Nov 6, 2017
1,621
1,202
Idiot Kerfoot cost us the game. Horrible give away then a totally unnecessary high stick. Fn loser. Wish we had Kadri
 

Azazel

Registered User
Jan 2, 2016
2,559
1,556
The funny thing is a lot of what you're saying isn't much of a "conspiracy" at all. It's all well documented. Shanahan making some enemies at the DOPS is the only thing that really sticks out as speculation.
Exactly. I have all the documentation as well. The only thing left is connect the dots. The problem is the "journalists" are company cheerleaders. A real journalist would dig deeper and find more then me.

And yes the Shananhan thing is rumour, but also brings up another point I forgot to add. Its just another rumour but on Dangles recent podcast (section Adam Wylde changes hockey) at the end they mention that the Leafs were also very vocal in the offseason about calls in the playoffs being the same standard as the season. Both just rumous but may point to some prickly feelings between us and the league
 
  • Like
Reactions: IPS

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,372
Toronto
Occam's razor would have also completely dismantled the Gulf of Tonkin being a false flag as a precursor to start a war in Vietnam until it got admitted to year's later.

Occam's Razor is sometimes not the best tool for deciphering things of this nature.

But anyways that's where I'm stopping before this goes way off topic.
Fair enough. But, one, look at it percentages wise (in regards to Occam's), and two, this ain't war.
 

Superstar

"Be water, my friend."
Jun 25, 2008
12,835
9,203
The NHL's biggest partner who is Rogers owns us. Leafs winning the cup would be dismissed by the same things. At the end of the day, I'm beyond pissed at that 5 on 3. But, to tell me its a calculated event tying to a larger conspiracy is it beyond questionable when you evaluate it by Occam's Razor.

The issue with Rogers is that they are a corporate entity...Leafs don't have an owner like the Bruins who would call up Bettman and give it to him. What if the ref's boss just shouts out "casually" to his crew of officials something like "I love the game of hockey and a game 7 would be awesome to see!" Doesn't really take much to "game manage". Refs would be literally looking for "something" if the Lightning are somehow behind in the game. We've seen corrupt officiating in other sports and organizations, not just hockey, because people could be corrupt.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: The National

Leaffan197703

Registered User
May 29, 2021
184
181
problem with Kadri was he could not control his temper and took a selfish penalty that caused a suspension and screwed his team over
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,372
Toronto
The issue with Rogers is that they are a corporate entity...Leafs don't have an owner like the Bruins who would call up Bettman and give it to him. What if the ref's boss just shouts out "casually" to his crew of officials something like "I love the game of hockey and a game 7 would be awesome to see!" Doesn't really take much to "game manage". Refs would be literally looking for "something" if the Lightning are somehow behind in the game. We've seen corrupt officiating in other sports and organizations, not just hockey, because people could be corrupt.
No one is denying Jacob's has the most power in the NHL outside of Bettman (and it's derived from Jacobs to be honest). Look, I'm beyond pissed off at the 5-3. I just think this type of thinking is a crutch to the ability to not being able to pull it off. Because it's easier to accept than face the truth, like the root of most conspiracy theories.
 

Superstar

"Be water, my friend."
Jun 25, 2008
12,835
9,203
problem with Kadri was he could not control his temper and took a selfish penalty that caused a suspension and screwed his team over

Yes, that was dumb, but what about the knee by DeBrusk that started the whole thing? Guy got nothing, no penalty, no fine, nothing. I remember in that game, Pastrnak literally jumped off his feet for a charge and got nothing. Officiating for that game was pathetic, designed to gave all the advantage to the Bruins.
 

Azazel

Registered User
Jan 2, 2016
2,559
1,556
The NHL's biggest partner who is Rogers owns us. Leafs winning the cup would be dismissed by the same things. At the end of the day, I'm beyond pissed at that 5 on 3. But, to tell me its a calculated event tying to a larger conspiracy is it beyond questionable when you evaluate it by Occam's Razor.

At the end of the day, I don't want excuses. Pull it off. Give me one before I die.
My issue is the league has made it very difficult for one team in particular to get it done. To me it isn't an excuse but an obstacle that needs to be overcome or removed. Short handed goals have helped a lot in overcoming this handicap but it would be better if it wasn't in the way to begin with.

Also I very rarely use it as an excuse for bad play. Bad play is bad play.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,372
Toronto
My issue is the league has made it very difficult for one team in particular to get it done. To me it isn't an excuse but an obstacle that needs to be overcome or removed. Short handed goals have helped a lot in overcoming this handicap but it would be better if it wasn't in the way to begin with.
If your issue is the assistance the Leafs provide to other teams, and the cap, I agree. But, that's a very different argument.
 

DANTHEMAN1967

Registered User
Aug 10, 2016
4,199
1,952
Idiot Kerfoot cost us the game. Horrible give away then a totally unnecessary high stick. Fn loser. Wish we had Kadri
Kadri would already have been suspended.
He is too stupid, how many series should he cost before he had to go?
One was too many.
 

Superstar

"Be water, my friend."
Jun 25, 2008
12,835
9,203
No one is denying Jacob's has the most power in the NHL outside of Bettman (and it's derived from Jacobs to be honest). Look, I'm beyond pissed off at the 5-3. I just think this type of thinking is a crutch to the ability to not being able to pull it off. Because it's easier to accept than face the truth, like the root of most conspiracy theories.

I'm not going to feel less bad if the Leafs don't win next game, they had their chances to win tonight's game...they just wouldn't have this much bigger mountain to climb if they didn't also have to battle the refs. After the Lightning tied the game tonight, refs literally put the whistle away because they did "their part" despite Tampa committing some egregious infractions after.
 

SeaOfBlue

The Passion That Unites Us All
Aug 1, 2013
35,591
16,776
The facts are the facts and you can discuss the motives all you like after. That's usually how it goes.

The facts are that the "soft and not built for the playoffs" Leafs have somehow become the most penalized team of the playoffs in the last 6 years.

*with Simmonds only playing 2 games and Clifford barely playing 2 shifts no less.

We don't even have our tough guys in, and yet we have been penalized more.

Some were tough 50/50 calls that have gone both ways, but there have been a bunch that have only been called one way all series. There is a lot of iffy calls going on right now, and it has accumulated to the point where the Leafs probably win this in 5 or 6 without those calls being made.

One hopes we get the ref advantage in Game 7. Or at least not the ref disadvantage. I think we win with either.
 

meefer

Registered User
Jun 9, 2015
4,833
4,894
Bangkok
Oooooook, a bit calmer now. Great game, how could you not like? Two great teams going toe to toe. Game 7, woooheee, the boys did give up, here we go. I like our team. GLG!

Oooooook, a bit calmer now. Great game, how could you not like? Two great teams going toe to toe. Game 7, woooheee, the boys did give up, here we go. I like our team. GLG!
Didn’t !
 

hfman

Registered User
Oct 30, 2013
3,230
1,584
little bit of an odd comment from Tavares in his post-game interview... referred to Leaf fans as "Leaf Nation" instead of "our fans", almost like a promo of sorts. just found it a little bit separated and strange...
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,372
Toronto
I'm not going to feel less bad if the Leafs don't win next game, they had their chances to win tonight's game...they just wouldn't have this much bigger mountain to climb if they didn't also have to battle the refs. After the Lightning tied the game tonight, refs literally put the whistle away because they did "their part" despite Tampa committing some egregious infractions after.
Don't confuse my thoughts that refs weren't part of an overlying conspiracy with the fact they weren't garbage. They were garbage.

But, I stand by, special players/legends overcome that, and I hope Leafs players do that. We had the opportunity to do that tonight. Now do it on Saturday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Superstar

Tak7

Registered User
Nov 1, 2009
13,347
5,237
GTA or the UK
Kerfoot cost the Leafs the first goal on a giveaway and the 3rd goal taking the penalty that put Leafs down 5 on 3 for almost a full 2 minutes. He also had a crap ton of giveaways. And why Engvall over Simmonds? Simmonds has scored 30 goals in this league and tough as nails. The only thing that can fix Engvalls hands is a chisel.
Thought Engvall actually had a good night - smart stick, strong on the walls, and really helped with breakouts out of the zone.

The speed of playoff hockey has passed Simmonds by. Calling for him to dress would basically mean the Leafs are down a man on their bench before a puck is dropped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seventieslord

Azazel

Registered User
Jan 2, 2016
2,559
1,556
If your issue is the assistance the Leafs provide to other teams, and the cap, I agree. But, that's a very different argument.
No, I have little regard for either. When I mean money I mean TV deals and merch and stadium seats sold in the southern markets. Fans like it when their team wins. They buy tickets to see winning teams. Canadian fans (especially Leaf fans) will fill the arena even if they haven't got a remote chance in hell of winning. So to fill the southern arenas you use the 'subjectivity' of officiating to sway the game in favour of the smaller market teams. It (questionable game management) also happens to teams like Edmonton and Calgary for example, or even Vancouver.

From everything ive heard the Rogers deal would be a drop in the bucket compared to what big US based sports networks would offer if hockey ever reached the popularity of some of the bigger sports.
 

TIGERCOOL

Registered User
Sep 29, 2014
2,261
1,256
Thought Engvall actually had a good night - smart stick, strong on the walls, and really helped with breakouts out of the zone.

The speed of playoff hockey has passed Simmonds by. Calling for him to dress would basically mean the Leafs are down a man on their bench before a puck is dropped.
I wouldnt dress Simmonds over him but in my eyes Engvall had a bad game. He looks intimidated out there, making bad passes and playing tentative. Kind of like the Engvall we all knew and felt luke-warm on prior to his breakout in the second half of the regular season. He has the ability to make a difference for us, he's gotta wake up.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,372
Toronto
No, I have little regard for either. When I mean money I mean TV deals and merch and stadium seats sold in the southern markets. Fans like it when their team wins. They buy tickets to see winning teams. Canadian fans (especially Leaf fans) will fill the arena even if they haven't got a remote chance in hell of winning. So to fill the southern arenas you use the 'subjectivity' of officiating to sway the game in favour of the smaller market teams. It (questionable game management) also happens to teams like Edmonton and Calgary for example, or even Vancouver.

From everything ive heard the Rogers deal would be a drop in the bucket compared to what big US based sports networks would offer if hockey ever reached the popularity of some of the bigger sports.
Then you are completely ignoring the NHL's biggest TV partner is Rogers/TSN. Southern Ontario is the 3rd biggest NHL market in existence on a pure numbers basis. On the amount of people who actually tune in, its higher. The Leafs financially operate in a different universe. The Leafs are pretty much the only way to get a deal like the last one.

Like honestly, why the hell is Crosby is Pitt and McDavid in Edmonton? Financially the league tilting things makes no sense on a conspiracy basis.
 

Squiffy

Victims, rn't we all
Oct 21, 2006
14,010
3,862
Toronto
An entire page of refs and conspiracies. Lord.

High sticks have been called hard for 15 years. Sucked ass but nothing to argue.

They should have won that game. I’m as jaded as anyone, but they played a hell of a game. I cannot se them losing game 7 at home. I just don’t. It took everything TB had to hold court. Bring it on
 

Superstar

"Be water, my friend."
Jun 25, 2008
12,835
9,203
No, I have little regard for either. When I mean money I mean TV deals and merch and stadium seats sold in the southern markets. Fans like it when their team wins. They buy tickets to see winning teams. Canadian fans (especially Leaf fans) will fill the arena even if they haven't got a remote chance in hell of winning. So to fill the southern arenas you use the 'subjectivity' of officiating to sway the game in favour of the smaller market teams. It (questionable game management) also happens to teams like Edmonton and Calgary for example, or even Vancouver.

From everything ive heard the Rogers deal would be a drop in the bucket compared to what big US based sports networks would offer if hockey ever reached the popularity of some of the bigger sports.

There's also gambling to grow the business, that's what Bettman wants...if there are less US teams playing in the playoffs, how are they going to give exposure to the US fans and the US market to grow the gambling market? Unfortunately, Bettman's business plan doesn't involve Canadian teams succeeding in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 57 Years No Cup

6ix

HitEmWit4LikeAustonM
Nov 26, 2014
7,105
5,476
Campbell is just another Andersen/Reimer so far. That OT goal was classic example of no composure in the crease. Can’t blame him as his salary is less than 2 mill, but Dubas gambled this season on him being a goalie with untapped potential. He’s not anything special, rinse and repeat. Nice guy tho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Space Coyote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad