Bluelines
Python FTW!
- Nov 17, 2013
- 12,349
- 4,559
One of my favourite broadway actresses.
She's ready for the challenge...TBH when you look like that who really cares if she is a good hockey coach...?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e23c/5e23c9e18c0427f464829e9157bd2d196fb05720" alt="kristinchenoweth.jpeg"/https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/entertainment/stage/2009/04/18/kristin_chenoweth_just_a_bit_naughty/kristinchenoweth.jpeg)
One of my favourite broadway actresses.
Having the personnel that they're responsible for getting the best out of in open rebellion is not exactly a strong defense for a manager of people (what a coach ultimately is)
You don't want the leafs to outspend their competition?
Be nice if the Leafs spent more money on an Experienced GM and Head Coach
Having the personnel that they're responsible for getting the best out of in open rebellion is not exactly a strong defense for a manager of people (what a coach ultimately is)
Because that’s worked so well in the past
Perspective……Last time we did that, the team went from last place to a 100+ point team…
And yet that “105 point team” got dominated against bruins that year. They were lucky to make it to game 7 that year.Last time we did that, the team went from last place to a 100+ point team…
And yet that “105 point team” got dominated against bruins that year. They were lucky to make it to game 7 that year.
I would argue that 2018-2019 team was better than 2017-2018 team.
Last time we did that, the team went from last place to a 100+ point team…
So we’re touting regular season success now? In that case, we just had an even better regular season despite needing to pay the star players who led that 100+ team actual contracts without the privilege of having them on ELC’s and wasting the extra money on Patrick Marleau and Nikita Zaitsev
We’re looking at what happened and evaluating it. The team was bad and it became good. Yes they lost on the playoffs, but it was always to a better team - Washington and Boston were legit contenders.
Zaitsev is a good #4 defenseman. That contract is too long, but 4.5 for a good #4 isn’t unreasonable.
And who made them bad? A couple of "experienced" GM's.
It was bad before they got here. They deliberately made it really bad in an attempt to get high picks. How'd that work out?
Brian Burke and Dave Nonis did not deliberately make the team bad lmao. Burke's key line when he got here, was "Screw the Pittsburgh model" in the sense of intentionally being bad to get high picks. He immediately came in and made additions to the team to try and improve. It wasn't until Shanahan came in, as a "inexperienced President" evaluated the team, and came to the conclusion we had to burn everything down and do it properly.
Burke and Nonis killed da team .. brutal trade to bring in Kessel for Seguin and HsamiltonBrian Burke and Dave Nonis did not deliberately make the team bad lmao. Burke's key line when he got here, was "Screw the Pittsburgh model" in the sense of intentionally being bad to get high picks. He immediately came in and made additions to the team to try and improve. It wasn't until Shanahan came in, as a "inexperienced President" evaluated the team, and came to the conclusion we had to burn everything down and do it properly.
As long as he fixes the PP and gets Marner either off the PK or makes him stop never try to flip the puck out I'm happy. I'd rather take him off because while he has been decent, he always thinks offence first and thats costly sometimes
Be nice if the Leafs spent more money on an Experienced GM and Head Coach
And who did Shanahan hire to execute his vision?
Yep and as luck would have it the Leafs are stuck with the ones that do poorly.He brought in Lou for the short-term and Dubas for the medium & long-term.
Im not sure what your point is here.
What does this have to do with the fact that experience level has no correlation with future success in hockey management and coaching?Honestly, it’s not even an arguable thing, so I’m not sure what this dance around goal posts you are doing is.
There’s experienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly. There’s inexperienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly.
That’s a matter of fact.
I have been thinking the same thing regarding Babcock and him not giving in to the “core” forwards. And I think Keefe (and Dubas) are the exact opposite. Makes you wonder who is really in charge.I'm not saying Babcock was a great coach for us or what not, and he definitely made some extremely stupid decisions but one thing he did do was not give in to the younger players and made them earn their time. I understand our best players are the core 4 but I can't help but feel that Keefe is hesitant to do anything regarding the lines that might upset them. A perfect example was these past playoffs and not separating Matthews and Marner when clearly there was nothing happening there. It's the playoffs, it's do or die time. You don't have time to waste to wait and hope something happens, you need to be decisive and go with who's playing the best.
You don't bring a ROOK into da PRIME time NHL gig ..you find a young rock star who learned/won somewhere else and then steal him over with progressive $$$$ based on ongoing performance.. like Detroit did with Stevie YHe brought in Lou for the short-term and Dubas for the medium & long-term.
Im not sure what your point is here.
What does this have to do with the fact that experience level has no correlation with future success in hockey management and coaching?Honestly, it’s not even an arguable thing, so I’m not sure what this dance around goal posts you are doing is.
There’s experienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly. There’s inexperienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly.
That’s a matter of fact.