Confirmed with Link: Leafs hire new assistant coach Dean Chynoweth

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
One of my favourite broadway actresses.

She's ready for the challenge...TBH when you look like that who really cares if she is a good hockey coach...?

kristinchenoweth.jpeg
 
Having the personnel that they're responsible for getting the best out of in open rebellion is not exactly a strong defense for a manager of people (what a coach ultimately is)

Every coach is hired to be fired... every coach even Scotty Bowman, Barry Trots, and Joel Quenneville lost the room... it happens
 
  • Like
Reactions: JT AM da real deal
Last time we did that, the team went from last place to a 100+ point team…
And yet that “105 point team” got dominated against bruins that year. They were lucky to make it to game 7 that year.
I would argue that 2018-2019 team was better than 2017-2018 team.
 
Last time we did that, the team went from last place to a 100+ point team…

So we’re touting regular season success now? In that case, we just had an even better regular season despite needing to pay the star players who led that 100+ team actual contracts without the privilege of having them on ELC’s and wasting the extra money on Patrick Marleau and Nikita Zaitsev
 
So we’re touting regular season success now? In that case, we just had an even better regular season despite needing to pay the star players who led that 100+ team actual contracts without the privilege of having them on ELC’s and wasting the extra money on Patrick Marleau and Nikita Zaitsev

We’re looking at what happened and evaluating it. The team was bad and it became good. Yes they lost on the playoffs, but it was always to a better team - Washington and Boston were legit contenders.

Zaitsev is a good #4 defenseman. That contract is too long, but 4.5 for a good #4 isn’t unreasonable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duffman955
We’re looking at what happened and evaluating it. The team was bad and it became good. Yes they lost on the playoffs, but it was always to a better team - Washington and Boston were legit contenders.

Zaitsev is a good #4 defenseman. That contract is too long, but 4.5 for a good #4 isn’t unreasonable.

And who made them bad? A couple of "experienced" GM's.

My point is, there's zero correlation with success between an experienced coach/gm and a fresh coach/gm. Zero. We have done both, and have had mixed results with both, and most importantly, neither have managed to get us the Stanley Cup.

Dubas' fault, will likely be his loyalty to the core of this team, and refusal to shake it up. He's taken different approaches to the supporting cast of the team during his couple season stint, and it's objectively made some very good additions to the team to surround the core with. However they haven't looked at the core, despite now repeated amount of times of them not earning their keep when they should be stepping their game up. Matthews and Marner want to wear letters on their jersey so bad, but neither have been able to step up when it matters.

It appears he and Shanahan have decided to live/die on that sword. Will it work? Maybe. Maybe we surprise and compete with Tampa for the division this season, and make a run and advance out of the divisional playoff rounds, and Matthews and Marner produce like they should, and everyone becomes happy. Maybe we struggle to make the playoffs, get knocked out in round 1, and MLSE cleans house.
 
It was bad before they got here. They deliberately made it really bad in an attempt to get high picks. How'd that work out?

Brian Burke and Dave Nonis did not deliberately make the team bad lmao. Burke's key line when he got here, was "Screw the Pittsburgh model" in the sense of intentionally being bad to get high picks. He immediately came in and made additions to the team to try and improve. It wasn't until Shanahan came in, as a "inexperienced President" evaluated the team, and came to the conclusion we had to burn everything down and do it properly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger
Brian Burke and Dave Nonis did not deliberately make the team bad lmao. Burke's key line when he got here, was "Screw the Pittsburgh model" in the sense of intentionally being bad to get high picks. He immediately came in and made additions to the team to try and improve. It wasn't until Shanahan came in, as a "inexperienced President" evaluated the team, and came to the conclusion we had to burn everything down and do it properly.

And who did Shanahan hire to execute his vision?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumman
Brian Burke and Dave Nonis did not deliberately make the team bad lmao. Burke's key line when he got here, was "Screw the Pittsburgh model" in the sense of intentionally being bad to get high picks. He immediately came in and made additions to the team to try and improve. It wasn't until Shanahan came in, as a "inexperienced President" evaluated the team, and came to the conclusion we had to burn everything down and do it properly.
Burke and Nonis killed da team .. brutal trade to bring in Kessel for Seguin and Hsamilton
 
I'm not saying Babcock was a great coach for us or what not, and he definitely made some extremely stupid decisions but one thing he did do was not give in to the younger players and made them earn their time. I understand our best players are the core 4 but I can't help but feel that Keefe is hesitant to do anything regarding the lines that might upset them. A perfect example was these past playoffs and not separating Matthews and Marner when clearly there was nothing happening there. It's the playoffs, it's do or die time. You don't have time to waste to wait and hope something happens, you need to be decisive and go with who's playing the best.
 
Tough man who could dish .. knows solid defensive principles .. to me a much better hire than Hakstol .. an improvement to team for sure ..
 
As long as he fixes the PP and gets Marner either off the PK or makes him stop never try to flip the puck out I'm happy. I'd rather take him off because while he has been decent, he always thinks offence first and thats costly sometimes

Every time he flips the puck in the playoffs he has to do 20 pushups on the spot.

Worked in Major League.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumman
And who did Shanahan hire to execute his vision?

He brought in Lou for the short-term and Dubas for the medium & long-term.

Im not sure what your point is here.

What does this have to do with the fact that experience level has no correlation with future success in hockey management and coaching?Honestly, it’s not even an arguable thing, so I’m not sure what this dance around goal posts you are doing is.

There’s experienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly. There’s inexperienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly.

That’s a matter of fact.
 
He brought in Lou for the short-term and Dubas for the medium & long-term.

Im not sure what your point is here.

What does this have to do with the fact that experience level has no correlation with future success in hockey management and coaching?Honestly, it’s not even an arguable thing, so I’m not sure what this dance around goal posts you are doing is.

There’s experienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly. There’s inexperienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly.

That’s a matter of fact.
Yep and as luck would have it the Leafs are stuck with the ones that do poorly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumman
I'm not saying Babcock was a great coach for us or what not, and he definitely made some extremely stupid decisions but one thing he did do was not give in to the younger players and made them earn their time. I understand our best players are the core 4 but I can't help but feel that Keefe is hesitant to do anything regarding the lines that might upset them. A perfect example was these past playoffs and not separating Matthews and Marner when clearly there was nothing happening there. It's the playoffs, it's do or die time. You don't have time to waste to wait and hope something happens, you need to be decisive and go with who's playing the best.
I have been thinking the same thing regarding Babcock and him not giving in to the “core” forwards. And I think Keefe (and Dubas) are the exact opposite. Makes you wonder who is really in charge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumman
He brought in Lou for the short-term and Dubas for the medium & long-term.

Im not sure what your point is here.

What does this have to do with the fact that experience level has no correlation with future success in hockey management and coaching?Honestly, it’s not even an arguable thing, so I’m not sure what this dance around goal posts you are doing is.

There’s experienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly. There’s inexperienced people who get hired and do really well, and some that do poorly.

That’s a matter of fact.
You don't bring a ROOK into da PRIME time NHL gig ..you find a young rock star who learned/won somewhere else and then steal him over with progressive $$$$ based on ongoing performance.. like Detroit did with Stevie Y
 
  • Like
Reactions: geo25 and forecheck

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad