Friedman: Leafs do not see Marner making more than Kane

Status
Not open for further replies.

WingsMJN2965

Registered User
Oct 13, 2017
18,106
17,700
I figured your werent.

Matthews was a superstar his first two seasons? I was just told he was an overpaid 73 point player though lol.

Larkin had 51 ES points in 2017/18, Crosby also had 51 and Nylander had 48. Defitnely some great production from the youngsters.

Not sure how Crosby is relevant in this discussion especially when Nylander out produced Larkin significantly at ES the previous year.

I have no interest of making this into a Nylander vs Larkin thread so will try to not comment on that anymore.

Not sure who said it but I didn't. FWIW, I do think Matthews did get paid highly, but with that type of player, your hands are pretty much tied and you have to pay them what they're asking. Not everybody gets lucky and has superstars that take massive discounts. And I think Marner is very much in the same group of, "You have to pay him."

And it just doesn't seem like he's inclined to sign for peanuts.

Crosby was only brought in as a representation of Larkin's ridiculous ES numbers on a team that was absolute dog shit last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ziggdiezan

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,403
24,554
Marner spent zero time on the 3rd/4th line this year. He spent almsost every single shift with Hyman-Tavares. Matthews spent the entire year with a combination of Johnsson/Kapanen and a bit of Nylander.

Yes, me and other poster were talking career to date.....not specifically this year.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,471
21,855
As a reminder, Nylander got paid $114,137.15 per point based off his 61 point season. Based on Marner's 94 points, that same $/pt is $10,728,892 for Marner.

That's is the absolute bare minimum I take if I am Marner.

Marner is also better without the puck and should get 8 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tripod

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
AM is the better goal scorer.

Marner produced more points, before people say PPG or PP60......durability is an asset just as much or more then skill so we can count that against Marner.

As stated the whole centre vs winger debate is overblown in general and especially with Marner who brings the assets that a centre does.

Quality of line mates? Not sure about that, Marner played time on the 3rd and 4th lines with grinders......AM has played long stretches with Nylander & KK.......obviously Hyman is who you are referring to which is fair comment.

Both are the same age and started the same year in the NHL.

IIRC Marner produced more ES this year (might be wrong, on cell can’t confirm) and AM more the two previous years.

So i don’t see a ton difference between them TBH......biggest argument would be goal scoring.......but that is partly offset by Marner scoring more points. Not huge difference and I suspect that’s how Marner & his camp see it which is what matters. Like I said I could see Marner giving a little taking hair less cap hit and one more year of term. Either way it’s going to be a huge cap hit and a problem to deal with.

Bobby Mac did lent comment on term, just cap hit for Rant.
The center vs winger is not overblown though. Top 10 cap hits, 6 center and 3 wingers. Top 15 it was like 9 centers and 4 wingers or something.

Regarding linemates I was talking about this year and yup Marner produced more ES points this year.

However every other year Matthews has more PPG and higher ES points than Marner except for the year Marner played with a franchise level talent. This year Marner had way better linemates than Matthews who had a revolving door of wingers (Kap, AJ and Marleau being top 3 most common).

For me I think position matter a lot as it has historically and I do think Matthews was overpaid in part to ignoring durability issues.
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
What matters more, what percentage of the cap Kane got after his ELC or what Matthews got in a contract a couple of months ago? If you're saying anything but the second one, I have some bad news for you. Marner's going to get the same contract as Matthews (or close to it), or he's not going to be playing for Toronto.
You brought up kane/toews contract though???
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,740
86,346
Redmond, WA
You brought up kane/toews contract though???

I brought up Kane and Toews to show that they took the same deal after their ELCs. I brought them up to say that Marner was going to get something very similar to Matthews, not that Marner was going to get something similar to Kane in 2011.
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,610
9,997
Waterloo
So if Marner signs for 11 million x7 years, is that not fair in your opinion, knowing that say McDavid and Matthews "could" be at 14 million on long term deals if they took what they were worth?

That is Marner taking 3 million less. Is that not more than fair considering he just had a better PPG than Matthews?

Honestly it's in the ballpark.

->His best historical comparable (Kane 2nd contract) puts him in the mid 9's by 5
->He could get as high as ~10.5 (depending on next years cap) on an OS that makes sense for almost every team to offer

Basically I think this offseason may see the realignment that Toews/Kane started when the refused to take the financial hit that keeping their cap hits in line with pre 2013 CBA backdiving deals would require.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,403
24,554
The center vs winger is not overblown though. Top 10 cap hits, 6 center and 3 wingers. Top 15 it was like 9 centers and 4 wingers or something.

Regarding linemates I was talking about this year and yup Marner produced more ES points this year.

However every other year Matthews has more PPG and higher ES points than Marner except for the year Marner played with a franchise level talent. This year Marner had way better linemates than Matthews who had a revolving door of wingers (Kap, AJ and Marleau being top 3 most common).

For me I think position matter a lot as it has historically and I do think Matthews was overpaid in part to ignoring durability issues.

Like the stats you posted above, wingers are clearly represented in the top cap hits......yes there are more centres in general and I stated that before......generally they are compared to your average winger......Marner isn’t your average winger. He’s just as good defensively as a centre and pushes play like a centre.....the only thing he doesn’t do as much/well is face offs.

AM overpaid? That’s a totally different debate, I hate the contract Dubas gave AM.....mostly bc of the term.
 

Notsince67

Papi and the Lamplighters
Apr 27, 2018
16,376
11,467
Is this why Toronto gave $7M to Nylander after a lengthy holdout, paying him $1M more than Larkin, who actually plays center and is significantly better?
I'm a leaf fan but there is no getting away from this logic. I readily admit the leafs screwed up. All arguments of Matthews deserving his cash because he is an elite #1 center (playing on the second line) and Nylander being an affordable contract for whatever reason is just bad. If you put lipstick on a pig it is still a pig. I'm just hoping the leafs can pull it all off with as little damage as possible.
 

Blueboy

Registered User
Apr 15, 2019
817
631
Marner spent zero time on the 3rd/4th line this year. He spent almsost every single shift with Hyman-Tavares. Matthews spent the entire year with a combination of Johnsson/Kapanen and a bit of Nylander.
Ignore the posters that are trolling without knowledge of the situation. They have fun making up narratives.

These are people just trying to get a rise of Leafs fans.

Johnsson and Kapanen are gone before Leafs have issues retaining Marner. Both were no shows in the back quarter of the season plus playoffs.
 

Notsince67

Papi and the Lamplighters
Apr 27, 2018
16,376
11,467
For whatever reason people arent using Toews/Kane's first deal after their ELC, they are using their third contract after multiple cup wins.

Kane got 11.09% on his first contract after ELC which with a 83 million dollar ceiling is 9.2 million for 5 years.

Malkin/Crosby are both centers and not comparables to Marner.
You keep citing centers vs wingers without detailing the differences in position. A center typically plays lower and has more defensive responsibilities. Marner is one of the best defensive forwards on the team. His back checking is elite, his PK usage indicates a high level of defensive acumen and his ability to intercept a puck in the defensive zone is unmatched. Centers are puck carriers and playmakers, often getting more assists than goals. Sounds familiar?...Stylewise and job wise, Marners characteristics match closer to a center with the exception of being higher in the dzone and not taking faceoffs. That is it. This whole mantra of centers vs forwards need a real qualification of the differences these positions demand. Marner checks most of the boxes. I would even say that he is more of a 200ft player than Matthews...who is often slow on the back check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tripod

Torontoborn

Registered User
Jan 9, 2019
900
305
So one can assume Laine will get more than Marner, then?

Because I'm pretty sure there's 0 chance that happens.

Laine is a winger just like Marner. If you are a goal scoring top line center you are held to a much higher standard than play making winger like Marner. If you have more ES goals you are held to a higher standard. Matthews has 1 more ES point then Marner does in less games.
 

Torontoborn

Registered User
Jan 9, 2019
900
305
No, I'm asking you how you're justifying the winger/center argument when Toronto's own GM has debunked it with the Nylander contract...

By the way, the consensus on Larkin vs. Nylander before the start of this year was pretty even, especially when anybody with half a brain considered Nylander was playing alongside Matthews, while Larkin was playing with Tatar. Now it's just not close.

And Larkin's not the only example of this either. MacKinnon and Barkov are on a completely different planet from Nylander and their contracts still don't inflate to the cap hit Nylander got.

So we can keep throwing around the, "Wingers aren't as valuable" crap, but Dubas ****ed that narrative up when he signed on the dotted line.

You do realize that Nylanders cap hit for the next 5 years in 6.9m per. His total salary next year is 9 and then falls to 6 the last 4 years. Nylander only made 10m because he missed 3 months of the season so it was to recoup what he lost.
 

topshelf15

Registered User
May 5, 2009
27,993
6,005
Think he get the same or close to Matthews,chances are the leafs will move one of Johnsson ,or Kappanen to make it all fit...But they have some kids like Bracco who look like they are ready,so dont really see this as much an issue
 

EP40 AKA Lil Wayne

Registered User
May 9, 2013
599
156
Johnsson and Kapanen are gone before Leafs have issues retaining Marner. Both were no shows in the back quarter of the season plus playoffs.

Leafs got out more than expected from Johnsson, you are talking like he is some top prospect who failed to live up to the hype.


OnT: Marner is worth Matthews money and I second the opinion that durability matters.
 

Blueboy

Registered User
Apr 15, 2019
817
631
Leafs got out more than expected from Johnsson, you are talking like he is some top prospect who failed to live up to the hype.


OnT: Marner is worth Matthews money and I second the opinion that durability matters.
Not at all. Word is he’s playing hardball during contract talks. Reality is, he’s a 24yo 40 point rookie who’s arb eligible.

I like him no doubt, but we’re not playing hardball for 40 point wingers, they can go if they don’t want to be here.
 

Legion34

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
18,984
9,002
Yes, me and other poster were talking career to date.....not specifically this year.

Marner has always been put in a better position to succeed.

Since day 1 he has been on the first pp. he started his career with Bozak and JVR. Then kadri and marleau (before the wheels came off)

Marner played a few games on the 4th. When he scored 2 goals in 36 games last year.

Matthews has spent his first and 3rd year with rookies. He got nylander as a sophomore last year and they were like the best line 5 on 5

Marner is great. But he flops around so much that he makes things look fancier.

Matthews has been better in every category over 3 years except ppg this year. And that’s because Marner had like 8 points on empty net assist
 

48g90a138pts

Registered User
Jun 30, 2016
10,485
5,956
Kane signed his contract almost 5 years ago. It's not even a reasonable argument that Marner doesn't deserve more.

Question is what would Kane be asking for today. 12-13mil per season? Then yes that argument can be justified.

This kind of bickering really needs to stop from the Leafs organization side. They want Marner to stay in TO.

With a new TV deal on the horizon, star players are better off signing a shorter deal anyways. A 3 or 4 year deal would be ideal. That way both sides win. Team gets a cheaper deal and the player can resign under a salary structure that will be set to explode.
 

Legion34

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
18,984
9,002
I brought up Kane and Toews to show that they took the same deal after their ELCs. I brought them up to say that Marner was going to get something very similar to Matthews, not that Marner was going to get something similar to Kane in 2011.

Except Kane is like a hundred times better than toews.

And Matthews has like 50 more goals in 30 less games
 

Nizdizzle

Offseason Is The Worst Season
Jul 7, 2007
13,861
6,872
Windsor, Ontario
twitter.com
Stannis would be rolling in his grave if he could read this thread.

d3dQm6V.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelly
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad